Suppr超能文献

个体化的对偶问题解决教育干预在异基因造血干细胞移植期间对患者和家属的影响:一项可行性研究。

An individualized dyadic problem-solving education intervention for patients and family caregivers during allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a feasibility study.

机构信息

National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Nurs. 2010 Mar-Apr;33(2):E24-32. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181be5e6d.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) generates multiple problems that vary in complexity and create significant distress for both patients and their caregivers. Interventions that address patient and family caregiver distress during allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have not been tested.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of conducting an individualized dyadic problem-solving education (PSE) intervention during HSCT and estimate a preliminary effect size on problem-solving skills and distress.

METHODS

The PSE intervention consisted of 4 sessions of the Prepared Family Caregiver PSE model. Data were collected with an interventionist log, subject interviews and standardized questionnaires.

RESULTS

Of the 34 adult dyads screened, 24 were ineligible primarily because of being non-English-speaking (n = 11) and inconsistent caregivers (n = 10). Ten dyads (n = 20) were enrolled, and 8 dyads (n = 16) completed the intervention. Of the 31 sessions, 29 were completed (94%). Worsening patient condition was the primary reason for sessions to be incomplete. Patients attended 90% of the sessions; caregivers attended 74%. Reasons for missed sessions included patient symptom distress and limited caregiver availability. Dyads reported being very satisfied (mean, 4.8 [SD, 1.8]; range, 1-5), stating "an opportunity to talk" and "creative thinking" were most beneficial.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that dyads can participate in PSE during HSCT and view it as beneficial. Participants identified the active process of solving problems as helpful.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Targeted interventions that promote effective, meaningful behaviors are needed to guide patients and caregivers through HSCT. Future research recommendations include testing a version of PSE with fewer sessions, including spousal and nonspousal caregivers and those who are non-English speaking.

摘要

背景

异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)会产生多种问题,这些问题的复杂性各不相同,给患者及其护理人员带来了巨大的困扰。目前尚未对干预异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)期间患者和家庭护理人员的痛苦的措施进行测试。

目的

评估在 HSCT 期间实施个体化的双重视角问题解决教育(PSE)干预的可行性,并初步评估其对问题解决技能和痛苦的影响。

方法

PSE 干预包括 4 次预备家庭护理人员 PSE 模型。通过干预员日志、访谈和标准化问卷收集数据。

结果

在筛选的 34 对成年患者及其护理人员中,有 24 对(82%)因主要是非英语语言(n=11)和护理人员不一致(n=10)而不合格。最终纳入 10 对(n=20)患者及其护理人员,其中 8 对(n=16)完成了干预。在 31 次访谈中,有 29 次(94%)完成。未完成的主要原因是患者病情恶化。患者参加了 90%的访谈,护理人员参加了 74%的访谈。未参加访谈的原因包括患者症状加重和护理人员可用性有限。患者及其护理人员对该干预非常满意(平均 4.8 [SD,1.8];范围 1-5),表示“有机会交谈”和“创造性思维”最有益。

结论

结果表明,HSCT 期间患者及其护理人员可以参与 PSE,并认为该干预有益。参与者认为积极解决问题的过程很有帮助。

实践意义

需要有针对性的干预措施来促进有效的、有意义的行为,以指导患者及其护理人员完成 HSCT。未来的研究建议包括测试一种包含较少访谈次数的 PSE 版本,纳入配偶和非配偶护理人员,以及非英语语言者。

相似文献

2
A problem-solving education intervention in caregivers and patients during allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
J Health Psychol. 2014 May;19(5):602-17. doi: 10.1177/1359105313475902. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
4
Balancing give and take between patients and their spousal caregivers in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Psychooncology. 2017 Dec;26(12):2224-2231. doi: 10.1002/pon.4340. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
5
Distress screening in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSCT) caregivers and patients.
Psychooncology. 2011 Jun;20(6):615-22. doi: 10.1002/pon.1906. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
9
10
Cortisol as an Acute Stress Biomarker in Young Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Patients/Caregivers: Active Music Engagement Protocol.
J Altern Complement Med. 2020 May;26(5):424-434. doi: 10.1089/acm.2019.0413. Epub 2020 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Study protocol for a pilot randomized trial building resiliency among caregivers of cancer curvivors and metavivors.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Jun 19;46:101506. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101506. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Intervention Development to Promote Medical Adherence After Stem Cell Transplant.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2025 Apr 26. doi: 10.1007/s10880-025-10078-0.
4
5
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Patient-Caregiver Dyad Perspectives on Participation in a Digital Storytelling Intervention: A Qualitative Approach.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Aug;29(8):520.e1-520.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.04.021. Epub 2023 May 1.
7
Positive Psychology Approaches to Interventions for Cancer Dyads: A Scoping Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;19(20):13561. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013561.
8
Health-Related and Economic Burden Among Family Caregivers of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Hematological Malignancies.
Adv Ther. 2021 Oct;38(10):5002-5024. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01872-x. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
9
Feasibility of a Digital Storytelling Intervention for Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Patients.
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Oct;37(5):1275-1285. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01948-2. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
10
Exploring the caregiver's experience in an innovative homebound hematopoietic stem cell transplantation program.
Palliat Support Care. 2021 Aug;19(4):397-404. doi: 10.1017/S1478951520000954.

本文引用的文献

1
Adaptation of family caregivers during the acute phase of adult BMT.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009 Jun;43(12):959-66. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2008.405. Epub 2008 Dec 22.
2
Collaborative coping and daily mood in couples dealing with prostate cancer.
Psychol Aging. 2008 Sep;23(3):505-16. doi: 10.1037/a0012687.
3
The symptom experience in the first 100 days following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).
Support Care Cancer. 2008 Nov;16(11):1243-54. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0420-6. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
6
Living with prostate cancer: patients' and spouses' psychosocial status and quality of life.
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Sep 20;25(27):4171-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.6503. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
7
The impact of providing symptom management assistance on caregiver reaction: results of a randomized trial.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Nov;32(5):433-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.05.019.
8
Efficacy of psychosocial interventions in cancer care: evidence is weaker than it first looks.
Ann Behav Med. 2006 Oct;32(2):104-10. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3202_5.
9
Cognitive-behavior group intervention for relatives of cancer patients: a controlled study.
J Psychosom Res. 2006 Aug;61(2):187-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.08.014.
10
Identifying problems faced by spouses and partners of patients with prostate cancer.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2006 Jul 1;33(4):807-14. doi: 10.1188/06.ONF.807-814.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验