University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth Campus, Duluth, MN 55812, USA.
College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;19(20):13561. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013561.
Positive psychology approaches (PPAs) to interventions focus on developing positive cognitions, emotions, and behavior. Benefits of these interventions may be compounded when delivered to interdependent dyads. However, dyadic interventions involving PPAs are relatively new in the cancer context. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of the available research evidence for use of dyadic PPA-based interventions in cancer and identify gaps in this literature.
Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a scoping review of intervention studies that included PPAs delivered to both members of an adult dyad including a cancer patient and support person (e.g., family caregiver, intimate partner).
Forty-eight studies, including 39 primary analyses and 28 unique interventions, were included. Most often (53.8%), the support person in the dyad was broadly defined as a "caregiver"; the most frequent specifically-defined role was spouse (41.0%). PPAs (e.g., meaning making) were often paired with other intervention components (e.g., education). Outcomes were mostly individual well-being or dyadic coping/adjustment.
Wide variability exists in PPA type/function and their targeted outcomes. More work is needed to refine the definition/terminology and understand specific mechanisms of positive psychology approaches.
积极心理学方法(PPA)干预侧重于培养积极的认知、情感和行为。当这些干预措施应用于相互依存的对子时,可能会产生更大的益处。然而,在癌症背景下,涉及 PPA 的对偶干预措施相对较新。本范围综述旨在概述癌症中使用基于 PPA 的对偶干预措施的现有研究证据,并确定该文献中的差距。
根据 PRISMA 指南,我们对包括向癌症患者和支持人员(例如家庭照顾者、亲密伴侣)提供 PPA 的成人对偶干预研究进行了范围综述。
共纳入 48 项研究,包括 39 项主要分析和 28 项独特的干预措施。最常见的是(53.8%),对偶中的支持人员被广泛定义为“照顾者”;最常见的特定定义角色是配偶(41.0%)。PPA(例如,意义建构)通常与其他干预成分(例如,教育)结合使用。结果主要是个体幸福感或对偶应对/调整。
PPA 类型/功能及其针对的结果存在很大差异。需要进一步研究来完善积极心理学方法的定义/术语,并了解其具体机制。