Suppr超能文献

一项针对儿科人群,比较开放性腹股沟疝修补术(有或无疝镜辅助)与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的研究。

A comparative study examining open inguinal herniotomy with and without hernioscopy to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a pediatric population.

作者信息

Niyogi Anindya, Tahim Arpan S, Sherwood William J, De Caluwe Diane, Madden Nicholas P, Abel Robin M, Haddad Munther J, Clarke Simon A

机构信息

Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Pediatr Surg Int. 2010 Apr;26(4):387-92. doi: 10.1007/s00383-010-2549-x. Epub 2010 Feb 9.

Abstract

AIMS

Open herniotomy with or without hernioscopy has been performed in our unit for a decade. Since 2005 the laparoscopic repair was also introduced. The aims of this study were: (1) to compare detection rates for direct visualization of the contralateral deep inguinal ring via the known sac using a 70 degrees scope and via umbilical 30 degrees laparoscopy and (2) to compare operative timings, metachronous and recurrence rates for the three different management pathways for inguinal hernia.

METHODS

A retrospective case note review was carried out over a 29 month period since the introduction of the laparoscopic hernia repair. All patients with inguinal hernia were identified from the work load of six surgeons encompassing the three methods of hernia management. Case notes were retrieved and the data analyzed using SPSS v.17.

RESULTS

A total of 308 patients had 326 hernias performed. Follow-up ranged from 3 months to 1 year (median 8 months). The male-female ratio was 4:1. Of the patients, 12% were neonates; 299 children presented with unilateral hernia. Of those, 164 (55%) children had open herniotomy without contralateral inspection, and 5 (3%) had metachronous hernia; 77 (26%) children had an open herniotomy with 70 degrees hernioscopy; 2 (3%) children, who were considered to have closed contralateral deep inguinal ring during hernioscopy, had metachronous hernia, and 58 (19%) children had a laparoscopic hernia repair and none of them had metachronous hernia. Detection of contralateral patent deep inguinal ring for 70 degrees hernioscopy and 30 degrees laparoscopy was 10 (13%) and 16 (28%), respectively (P = 0.0465). Operative timing was significantly longer for laparoscopic repair (P < or = 0.0001). During the study period there were 11 recurrences; 9 (5%) in the open only group and 2 (3%) in the laparoscopic group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair are important for discussion as operative methods differ from that of herniotomy. The detection rate of contralateral patent deep inguinal ring appears to be higher for direct visualization via umbilical 30 degrees laparoscopy versus 70 degrees scope via the hernia sac. Whilst laparoscopy offers potential advantage of improved visualization, longer term prospective data collection is needed to compare these methods of operative hernia management.

摘要

目的

在我们科室,采用开放疝修补术(有或无疝镜辅助)已开展了十年。自2005年起,也引入了腹腔镜修补术。本研究的目的是:(1)比较使用70°镜经已知疝囊直接观察对侧腹股沟深环与经脐部30°腹腔镜观察的检出率;(2)比较腹股沟疝三种不同治疗途径的手术时间、异时性疝发生率及复发率。

方法

自腹腔镜疝修补术开展以来,进行了为期29个月的回顾性病例记录 review。从六位外科医生的工作量中识别出所有腹股沟疝患者,涵盖三种疝治疗方法。检索病例记录并使用SPSS v.17分析数据。

结果

共有308例患者接受了326例疝修补术。随访时间为3个月至1年(中位时间8个月)。男女比例为4:1。患者中,12%为新生儿;299例儿童为单侧疝。其中,164例(55%)儿童接受了未检查对侧的开放疝修补术,5例(3%)发生异时性疝;77例(26%)儿童接受了70°疝镜辅助的开放疝修补术;2例(3%)在疝镜检查时被认为对侧腹股沟深环已闭合的儿童发生了异时性疝,58例(19%)儿童接受了腹腔镜疝修补术,无一例发生异时性疝。70°疝镜检查和30°腹腔镜检查对侧腹股沟深环通畅的检出率分别为10例(13%)和16例(28%)(P = 0.0465)。腹腔镜修补术的手术时间明显更长(P≤0.0001)。研究期间有11例复发;单纯开放组9例(5%),腹腔镜组2例(3%)。

结论

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的结果对于讨论很重要,因为手术方法与疝修补术不同。经脐部30°腹腔镜直接观察对侧腹股沟深环通畅的检出率似乎高于经疝囊使用70°镜观察。虽然腹腔镜提供了改善可视化的潜在优势,但需要长期前瞻性数据收集来比较这些手术治疗疝的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验