Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Comparative effectiveness.
Trustee. 2010 Jan;63(1):13-4, 19-21.
2
An evaluation of recent federal spending on comparative effectiveness research: priorities, gaps, and next steps.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1768-76. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0687.
3
Science and the stiumulus. Medicine under the microscope.
Science. 2009 Nov 27;326(5957):1183-5. doi: 10.1126/science.326.5957.1183.
4
The promise and future of comparative effectiveness research.
J Nurs Care Qual. 2010 Jan-Mar;25(1):1-4. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0b013e3181c105b7.
5
The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act investment in comparative effectiveness research: lessons learned and implications for future investments.
J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Nov;3(6):559. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.75.
6
Spending limited health care dollars on what works best: the promise of comparative effectiveness research.
N C Med J. 2010 May-Jun;71(3):265-6.
7
The relevance of international studies to informed pharmacoeconomics and health policy decisions.
Clin Ther. 2010 Jan;32(1):106-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.01.023.
8
How a unique provision in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act set a foundation for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Nov;3(6):565-6. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.59.
9
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act investments in data infrastructure.
J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Nov;3(6):591-600. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.56.
10
Comparative effectiveness research: does the emperor have clothes?
Altern Ther Health Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;17(2):8-15.
Zotero 插件