Suppr超能文献

化学品急性毒性测试——避免重复测试和采用替代方法的机会。

Acute toxicity testing of chemicals-Opportunities to avoid redundant testing and use alternative approaches.

机构信息

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research, London, UK.

出版信息

Crit Rev Toxicol. 2010 Jan;40(1):50-83. doi: 10.3109/10408440903401511.

Abstract

Assessment of the acute systemic oral, dermal, and inhalation toxicities, skin and eye irritancy, and skin sensitisation potential of chemicals is required under regulatory schemes worldwide. In vivo studies conducted to assess these endpoints can sometimes be associated with substantial adverse effects in the test animals, and their use should always be scientifically justified. It has been argued that while information obtained from such acute tests provides data needed to meet classification and labelling regulations, it is of limited value for hazard and risk assessments. Inconsistent application of in vitro replacements, protocol requirements across regions, and bridging principles also contribute to unnecessary and redundant animal testing. Assessment of data from acute oral and dermal toxicity testing demonstrates that acute dermal testing rarely provides value for hazard assessment purposes when an acute oral study has been conducted. Options to waive requirements for acute oral and inhalation toxicity testing should be employed to avoid unnecessary in vivo studies. In vitro irritation models should receive wider adoption and be used to meet regulatory needs. Global requirements for sensitisation testing need continued harmonisation for both substance and mixture assessments. This paper highlights where alternative approaches or elimination of tests can reduce and refine animal use for acute toxicity requirements.

摘要

在全球监管方案下,需要评估化学品的急性系统口服、皮肤和吸入毒性、皮肤和眼睛刺激性以及皮肤致敏性潜力。为了评估这些终点而进行的体内研究有时可能会导致试验动物出现严重的不良反应,因此其使用必须始终有科学依据。有人认为,虽然从这些急性试验中获得的信息提供了满足分类和标签法规所需的数据,但对于危害和风险评估来说,其价值有限。体外替代物的不一致应用、各地区的方案要求以及桥接原则也导致了不必要和重复的动物试验。对急性口服和皮肤毒性试验数据的评估表明,当进行了急性口服研究时,急性皮肤试验很少为危害评估提供价值。应该采用免除急性口服和吸入毒性试验要求的方法,以避免不必要的体内研究。应更广泛地采用体外刺激性模型,并将其用于满足监管需求。对于致敏性测试的全球要求,无论是物质还是混合物评估,都需要继续协调一致。本文强调了替代方法或消除测试如何减少和优化急性毒性要求的动物使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验