Zisser Howard C, Bailey Timothy S, Schwartz Sherwyn, Ratner Robert E, Wise Jonathan
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute and University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93105, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Sep 1;3(5):1146-54. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300519.
The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of measurements obtained from the DexCom SEVEN system with Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) laboratory measurements of venous blood glucose.
Seventy-two subjects with insulin-requiring diabetes, aged 18-71, were enrolled in a multicenter, prospective single-arm study. All participants wore the SEVEN continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system for one, 7-day wear period. Calibration with capillary finger stick measurements was performed 2 hours after sensor insertion and once every 12 hours thereafter. A subset of subjects (28) wore two systems simultaneously to assess precision. All subjects participated in one, 10-hour in-clinic session on day 1, 4, or 7 of the study to compare CGM measurements against a laboratory method (YSI analyzer) using venous measurements taken once every 20 minutes. Carbohydrate consumption and insulin dosing were adjusted in order to obtain a broad range of glucose values.
Comparison of CGM measurements with the laboratory reference method (n = 2318) gave mean and median absolute relative differences (ARDs) of 16.7 and 13.2%, respectively. The percentage was 70.4% in the clinically accurate Clarke error grid A zone and 27.5% in the benign error B zone. Performance of the SEVEN system was consistent over time with mean and median ARD lowest on day 7 as compared to YSI (13.3 and 10.2%, respectively). Average sensor time lag was 5 minutes.
Measurements of the DexCom SEVEN system were found to be consistent and accurate compared with venous measurements made using a laboratory reference method over 7 days of wear.
本研究的目的是比较德康SEVEN系统所测结果与黄泉仪器公司(YSI)实验室静脉血糖测量结果的准确性。
72名年龄在18至71岁之间、需要胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者参与了一项多中心、前瞻性单臂研究。所有参与者佩戴SEVEN连续血糖监测(CGM)系统7天。传感器插入2小时后,以及此后每12小时,用毛细血管指尖血糖测量值进行校准。一部分受试者(28名)同时佩戴两个系统以评估精度。在研究的第1、4或7天,所有受试者参加一次时长10小时的门诊,使用每20分钟采集一次的静脉测量值,将CGM测量结果与实验室方法(YSI分析仪)进行比较。调整碳水化合物摄入量和胰岛素剂量,以获得广泛的血糖值范围。
将CGM测量结果与实验室参考方法(n = 2318)进行比较,平均和中位数绝对相对差异(ARD)分别为16.7%和13.2%。在临床准确的克拉克误差网格A区的比例为70.4%,在良性误差B区的比例为27.5%。与YSI相比,SEVEN系统的性能随时间保持一致,第7天的平均和中位数ARD最低(分别为13.3%和10.2%)。平均传感器时间滞后为5分钟。
与使用实验室参考方法进行的7天静脉测量相比,德康SEVEN系统的测量结果具有一致性和准确性。