Suppr超能文献

SEVEN连续血糖监测系统的准确性:与频繁采集的静脉血糖测量结果的比较。

Accuracy of the SEVEN continuous glucose monitoring system: comparison with frequently sampled venous glucose measurements.

作者信息

Zisser Howard C, Bailey Timothy S, Schwartz Sherwyn, Ratner Robert E, Wise Jonathan

机构信息

Sansum Diabetes Research Institute and University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93105, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Sep 1;3(5):1146-54. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300519.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of measurements obtained from the DexCom SEVEN system with Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) laboratory measurements of venous blood glucose.

METHODS

Seventy-two subjects with insulin-requiring diabetes, aged 18-71, were enrolled in a multicenter, prospective single-arm study. All participants wore the SEVEN continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system for one, 7-day wear period. Calibration with capillary finger stick measurements was performed 2 hours after sensor insertion and once every 12 hours thereafter. A subset of subjects (28) wore two systems simultaneously to assess precision. All subjects participated in one, 10-hour in-clinic session on day 1, 4, or 7 of the study to compare CGM measurements against a laboratory method (YSI analyzer) using venous measurements taken once every 20 minutes. Carbohydrate consumption and insulin dosing were adjusted in order to obtain a broad range of glucose values.

RESULTS

Comparison of CGM measurements with the laboratory reference method (n = 2318) gave mean and median absolute relative differences (ARDs) of 16.7 and 13.2%, respectively. The percentage was 70.4% in the clinically accurate Clarke error grid A zone and 27.5% in the benign error B zone. Performance of the SEVEN system was consistent over time with mean and median ARD lowest on day 7 as compared to YSI (13.3 and 10.2%, respectively). Average sensor time lag was 5 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of the DexCom SEVEN system were found to be consistent and accurate compared with venous measurements made using a laboratory reference method over 7 days of wear.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是比较德康SEVEN系统所测结果与黄泉仪器公司(YSI)实验室静脉血糖测量结果的准确性。

方法

72名年龄在18至71岁之间、需要胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者参与了一项多中心、前瞻性单臂研究。所有参与者佩戴SEVEN连续血糖监测(CGM)系统7天。传感器插入2小时后,以及此后每12小时,用毛细血管指尖血糖测量值进行校准。一部分受试者(28名)同时佩戴两个系统以评估精度。在研究的第1、4或7天,所有受试者参加一次时长10小时的门诊,使用每20分钟采集一次的静脉测量值,将CGM测量结果与实验室方法(YSI分析仪)进行比较。调整碳水化合物摄入量和胰岛素剂量,以获得广泛的血糖值范围。

结果

将CGM测量结果与实验室参考方法(n = 2318)进行比较,平均和中位数绝对相对差异(ARD)分别为16.7%和13.2%。在临床准确的克拉克误差网格A区的比例为70.4%,在良性误差B区的比例为27.5%。与YSI相比,SEVEN系统的性能随时间保持一致,第7天的平均和中位数ARD最低(分别为13.3%和10.2%)。平均传感器时间滞后为5分钟。

结论

与使用实验室参考方法进行的7天静脉测量相比,德康SEVEN系统的测量结果具有一致性和准确性。

相似文献

10

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes.1型糖尿病的持续血糖监测与强化治疗
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 2;359(14):1464-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805017. Epub 2008 Sep 8.
3
Real-time continuous glucose monitoring.实时连续血糖监测
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2007 Aug;14(4):288-95. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e32825a675e.
9
Continuous glucose monitoring and closed-loop systems.持续葡萄糖监测与闭环系统。
Diabet Med. 2006 Jan;23(1):1-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01672.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验