Suppr超能文献

工厂校准的实时连续血糖监测系统在1型糖尿病儿科参与者中的性能

Performance of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Pediatric Participants With Type 1 Diabetes.

作者信息

Welsh John B, Zhang Xiaohe, Puhr Sarah A, Johnson Terri Kang, Walker Tomas C, Balo Andrew K, Price David

机构信息

1 Dexcom, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Mar;13(2):254-258. doi: 10.1177/1932296818798816. Epub 2018 Sep 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The perceived value and consistent use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems depends in part on their accuracy. We assessed the performance of a sixth-generation CGM system (Dexcom G6) in children and adolescents.

METHODS

Forty-nine participants (6-17 years of age, mean ± SD of 13.5 ± 3.3 years), all with type 1 diabetes, enrolled and data were available from 37. Each participant wore 1 sensor for up to 10 days and was asked to undergo an in-clinic visit lasting 6-12 hours for frequent blood glucose (BG) sample testing on one of the sensor wear days. Estimated glucose values (EGVs) from the G6 system were compared with venous BG values measured with a laboratory reference instrument (YSI).

RESULTS

The overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) for 1387 EGV-YSI pairs was 7.7%, and the overall percentage of EGVs within 20% or 20 mg/dL of the YSI reference value (for YSI > or ⩽100 mg/dL, respectively, the "%20/20") was 96.2%. The %20/20 was 92.1% on Day 1 and 91.0% on Day 10 of sensor wear. For EGVs <70 mg/dL, 92.6% of the YSI values were within 20 mg/dL and for EGVs >250 mg/dL, 100% of the YSI values were within 20%. Differences between EGVs and YSI values in over 99.9% of the pairs posed no or only slight clinical risk as evaluated by surveillance error grid analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of the G6 CGM system in pediatrics may encourage consistent use of the system and contribute to improved glycemic outcomes in this population.

摘要

背景

连续血糖监测(CGM)系统的感知价值和持续使用部分取决于其准确性。我们评估了第六代CGM系统(德康G6)在儿童和青少年中的性能。

方法

49名参与者(6至17岁,平均±标准差为13.5±3.3岁),均为1型糖尿病患者,进行了登记,37名参与者的数据可用。每位参与者佩戴1个传感器长达10天,并被要求在佩戴传感器的某天进行一次为期6至12小时的门诊,以便频繁进行血糖(BG)样本检测。将G6系统的估计血糖值(EGV)与使用实验室参考仪器(YSI)测量的静脉BG值进行比较。

结果

1387对EGV-YSI数据的总体平均绝对相对差异(MARD)为7.7%,EGV在YSI参考值的20%或20 mg/dL范围内(分别针对YSI>或≤100 mg/dL)的总体百分比(“%20/20”)为96.2%。在传感器佩戴的第1天,“%20/20”为92.1%,在第10天为91.0%。对于EGV<70 mg/dL,92.6%的YSI值在20 mg/dL范围内;对于EGV>250 mg/dL,100%的YSI值在20%范围内。通过监测误差网格分析评估,超过99.9%的数据对中EGV与YSI值之间的差异无临床风险或仅有轻微临床风险。

结论

G6 CGM系统在儿科的准确性可能会促使该系统的持续使用,并有助于改善该人群的血糖控制效果

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d11/6399785/35416ffaa70c/10.1177_1932296818798816-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验