• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

舒尼替尼治疗转移性肾细胞癌:使用动态对比增强超声早期评估治疗反应。

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib: early evaluation of treatment response using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

机构信息

Imaging Department, Service of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, and Medical Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif Cedex, France.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Feb 15;16(4):1216-25. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2175. Epub 2010 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2175
PMID:20145174
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the utility of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US) as a prognostic tool for metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving sunitinib and to identify DCE-US parameters that correlate with early treatment response.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Thirty-eight patients received 50 mg/d sunitinib on schedule 4/2 (4 weeks on followed by 2 weeks off treatment). After two cycles, response evaluation criteria in solid tumors were used to classify patients as responders or nonresponders. DCE-US evaluations were done before treatment and at day 15; variations between days 0 and 15 were calculated for seven DCE-US functional parameters and were compared for responders and nonresponders. The correlation between DCE-US parameters and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed.

RESULTS

The ratio between DCE-US examinations at baseline and day 15 significantly correlated with response in five of the seven DCE-US parameters. Two DCE-US parameters (time to peak intensity and slope of the wash-in) were significantly associated with DFS; time to peak intensity was also significantly associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

DCE-US is a useful tool for predicting the early efficacy of sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. Robust correlations were observed between functional parameters and classic assessments, including DFS and OS.

摘要

目的

确定动态对比增强超声(DCE-US)作为接受舒尼替尼治疗的转移性肾细胞癌患者的预后工具的效用,并确定与早期治疗反应相关的 DCE-US 参数。

实验设计

38 名患者按计划接受 50mg/d 舒尼替尼治疗,4/2 方案(4 周治疗后 2 周停药)。两个周期后,采用实体瘤反应评估标准将患者分为应答者和无应答者。在治疗前和第 15 天进行 DCE-US 评估;计算 0 天和 15 天之间的七个 DCE-US 功能参数的变化,并比较应答者和无应答者之间的变化。评估 DCE-US 参数与无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)的相关性。

结果

在基线和第 15 天的 DCE-US 检查之间的比值与五个 DCE-US 参数中的五个参数的反应显著相关。两个 DCE-US 参数(达峰时间和洗脱斜率)与 DFS 显著相关;达峰时间也与 OS 显著相关。

结论

DCE-US 是预测转移性肾细胞癌患者舒尼替尼早期疗效的有用工具。功能参数与经典评估之间存在稳健的相关性,包括 DFS 和 OS。

相似文献

1
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib: early evaluation of treatment response using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.舒尼替尼治疗转移性肾细胞癌:使用动态对比增强超声早期评估治疗反应。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Feb 15;16(4):1216-25. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2175. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
2
The prognostic and predictive value of vascular response parameters measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced-CT, -MRI and -US in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib.动态对比增强 CT、MRI 和 US 测量的血管反应参数在接受舒尼替尼治疗的转移性肾细胞癌患者中的预后和预测价值。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Jun;28(6):2281-2290. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5220-2. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
3
Dynamic microbubble contrast-enhanced US to measure tumor response to targeted therapy: a proposed clinical protocol with results from renal cell carcinoma patients receiving antiangiogenic therapy.动态微泡超声造影评估靶向治疗的肿瘤反应:一项临床方案研究,入组接受抗血管生成治疗的肾癌患者的结果。
Radiology. 2011 Aug;260(2):581-90. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101893. Epub 2011 May 9.
4
CT texture analysis: a potential tool for prediction of survival in patients with metastatic clear cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib.CT 纹理分析:一种预测舒尼替尼治疗转移性透明细胞癌患者生存的潜在工具。
Cancer Imaging. 2017 Jan 23;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40644-017-0106-8.
5
Outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer treated with individualized sunitinib therapy: correlation with dynamic microbubble ultrasound data and review of the literature.接受个体化舒尼替尼治疗的转移性肾细胞癌患者的疗效:与动态微泡超声数据的相关性及文献综述
Urol Oncol. 2014 May;32(4):480-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
6
Computed tomography characteristics of unresectable primary renal cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant sunitinib.新辅助舒尼替尼治疗不可切除的原发性肾细胞癌的计算机断层扫描特征。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2014 Apr;12(2):117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Oct 12.
7
Morphology, Attenuation, Size, and Structure (MASS) criteria: assessing response and predicting clinical outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on antiangiogenic targeted therapy.形态学、衰减、大小和结构 (MASS) 标准:评估抗血管生成靶向治疗转移性肾细胞癌的反应和预测临床结局。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jun;194(6):1470-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3456.
8
To predict progression-free survival and overall survival in metastatic renal cancer treated with sorafenib: pilot study using dynamic contrast-enhanced Doppler ultrasound.预测索拉非尼治疗转移性肾癌的无进展生存期和总生存期:使用动态对比增强多普勒超声的初步研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2006 Oct;42(15):2472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.023. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
9
Sequential FDG-PET/CT as a biomarker of response to Sunitinib in metastatic clear cell renal cancer.连续 FDG-PET/CT 作为舒尼替尼治疗转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌反应的生物标志物。
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Sep 15;17(18):6021-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3309. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
10
Quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib or interferon alfa: results from a phase III randomized trial.舒尼替尼或干扰素α治疗转移性肾细胞癌患者的生活质量:一项III期随机试验的结果
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 1;26(22):3763-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5145.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive and Repeatable Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Quantification Approach for Clinical Evaluations of Tumor Blood Flow.一种用于肿瘤血流临床评估的全面且可重复的超声造影定量方法。
Invest Radiol. 2025 Apr 1;60(4):281-290. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000001127. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
2
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Prediction of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Systemic and Locoregional Therapies.动态对比增强超声在预测晚期肝细胞癌对全身和局部治疗反应中的应用
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 27;16(3):551. doi: 10.3390/cancers16030551.
3
Super-resolution ultrasound microvascular imaging: Is it ready for clinical use?
超分辨率超声微血管成像:它是否已准备好用于临床?
Z Med Phys. 2023 Aug;33(3):309-323. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.04.001. Epub 2023 May 20.
4
Multiparametric MRI for assessment of early response to neoadjuvant sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma.多参数 MRI 评估肾癌新辅助舒尼替尼治疗的早期反应。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 26;16(10):e0258988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258988. eCollection 2021.
5
Results of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Correlate With Treatment Outcome in Canine Neoplasia Treated With Electrochemotherapy and Interleukin-12 Plasmid Electrotransfer.动态对比增强超声检查结果与接受电化学疗法和白细胞介素-12质粒电转染治疗的犬肿瘤的治疗结果相关。
Front Vet Sci. 2021 May 20;8:679073. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.679073. eCollection 2021.
6
Assessment of sorafenib induced changes in tumor perfusion of uveal melanoma metastases with dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US).评估索拉非尼诱导的葡萄膜黑色素瘤转移瘤肿瘤灌注的变化:动态对比增强超声(DCE-US)。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Apr;148(4):955-965. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03666-8. Epub 2021 May 28.
7
Combined treatment of sorafenib and doxorubicin-loaded microbubble-albumin nanoparticle complex for hepatocellular carcinoma: A feasibility study.索拉非尼和载多柔比星微泡白蛋白纳米粒复合物联合治疗肝细胞癌的可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 11;15(12):e0243815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243815. eCollection 2020.
8
Spatial Characterization of Tumor Perfusion Properties from 3D DCE-US Perfusion Maps are Early Predictors of Cancer Treatment Response.从 3D DCE-US 灌注图中对肿瘤灌注特性进行空间特征分析可早期预测癌症治疗反应。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 24;10(1):6996. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63810-1.
9
Assessment of angiogenesis in rabbit orthotropic liver tumors using three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with two-dimensional DCE-US.采用三维动态对比增强超声与二维 DCE-US 评估兔原位肝肿瘤血管生成。
Jpn J Radiol. 2019 Oct;37(10):701-709. doi: 10.1007/s11604-019-00861-z. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
10
Emerging Functional Imaging Biomarkers of Tumour Responses to Radiotherapy.肿瘤放疗反应的新兴功能成像生物标志物
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jan 23;11(2):131. doi: 10.3390/cancers11020131.