Department of Radiation Physics, Unit 94, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Mar 7;55(5):1343-62. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/5/006. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
We discovered an empirical relationship between the logarithm of mean excitation energy (ln Im) and the effective atomic number (EAN) of human tissues, which allows for computing patient-specific proton stopping power ratios (SPRs) using dual-energy CT (DECT) imaging. The accuracy of the DECT method was evaluated for 'standard' human tissues as well as their variance. The DECT method was compared to the existing standard clinical practice-a procedure introduced by Schneider et al at the Paul Scherrer Institute (the stoichiometric calibration method). In this simulation study, SPRs were derived from calculated CT numbers of known material compositions, rather than from measurement. For standard human tissues, both methods achieved good accuracy with the root-mean-square (RMS) error well below 1%. For human tissues with small perturbations from standard human tissue compositions, the DECT method was shown to be less sensitive than the stoichiometric calibration method. The RMS error remained below 1% for most cases using the DECT method, which implies that the DECT method might be more suitable for measuring patient-specific tissue compositions to improve the accuracy of treatment planning for charged particle therapy. In this study, the effects of CT imaging artifacts due to the beam hardening effect, scatter, noise, patient movement, etc were not analyzed. The true potential of the DECT method achieved in theoretical conditions may not be fully achievable in clinical settings. Further research and development may be needed to take advantage of the DECT method to characterize individual human tissues.
我们发现了人类组织的平均激发能量对数(ln Im)与有效原子数(EAN)之间的经验关系,这使得可以使用双能 CT(DECT)成像计算患者特定的质子阻止比(SPRs)。我们评估了 DECT 方法在“标准”人体组织及其方差中的准确性。将 DECT 方法与现有的标准临床实践(Paul Scherrer 研究所的 Schneider 等人引入的程序-化学计量校准方法)进行了比较。在这项模拟研究中,SPRs 是从已知材料组成的计算 CT 数中得出的,而不是从测量中得出的。对于标准人体组织,两种方法都具有很好的准确性,均方根(RMS)误差均低于 1%。对于与标准人体组织组成相差不大的人体组织,DECT 方法的灵敏度低于化学计量校准方法。在大多数情况下,使用 DECT 方法的 RMS 误差仍保持在 1%以下,这意味着 DECT 方法可能更适合测量患者特定的组织组成,以提高带电粒子治疗计划的准确性。在这项研究中,没有分析由于束硬化效应,散射,噪声,患者运动等引起的 CT 成像伪影的影响。在理论条件下实现的 DECT 方法的真正潜力可能无法在临床环境中完全实现。可能需要进一步的研究和开发,以利用 DECT 方法来描述个体人体组织。