• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤后应激障碍随机临床试验中选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与安慰剂的脱落率的Meta分析。

Meta-analysis of dropout rates in SSRIs versus placebo in randomized clinical trials of PTSD.

作者信息

Lurie Ido, Levine Stephen Z

机构信息

Outpatient Clinic, Shalvatah Mental Health Center, Hod Hasharon, Israel.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010 Feb;198(2):116-24. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181cc41b6.

DOI:10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181cc41b6
PMID:20145486
Abstract

Meta-analysis was conducted to examine dropout predictors and differences between SSRIs and placebo in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of PTSD. Studies systematically located were SSRI versus placebo double blind RCTs of PTSD DSM diagnosis published between 1991 and 2008. Fourteen RCTs (n = 2815) met the inclusion criteria with an average duration of 10.8 weeks. Dropout rates were: 331 of 1111 (29.8%) among placebo arm and 513 of 1704 (30.3%) among SSRI participants. Random effects modeling showed that the dropout rates of SSRIs and placebo did not differ (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.82-1.34), although favored SSRIs among civilian traumas (OR = 2.52, 95% CI = 1.11-5.7). Mixed effects modeling showed dropout was predicted by mixed trauma in the placebo arms, and duration and mean dose across treatments. With the exception of civilian trauma, SSRIs dropout rates were slightly lower than those of placebo. Formulae are available to guide the prediction of dropout.

摘要

进行了荟萃分析,以检查创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)随机临床试验(RCT)中退出研究的预测因素以及选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)与安慰剂之间的差异。系统检索到的研究为1991年至2008年间发表的PTSD DSM诊断的SSRI与安慰剂双盲RCT。14项RCT(n = 2815)符合纳入标准,平均持续时间为10.8周。退出率分别为:安慰剂组1111例中有331例(29.8%),SSRI组1704例中有513例(30.3%)。随机效应模型显示,SSRI与安慰剂的退出率无差异(OR = 1.05,95%CI = 0.82 - 1.34),尽管在平民创伤中SSRI更具优势(OR = 2.52,95%CI = 1.11 - 5.7)。混合效应模型显示,安慰剂组的混合创伤、治疗的持续时间和平均剂量可预测退出情况。除平民创伤外,SSRI的退出率略低于安慰剂。有公式可用于指导退出情况的预测。

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis of dropout rates in SSRIs versus placebo in randomized clinical trials of PTSD.创伤后应激障碍随机临床试验中选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与安慰剂的脱落率的Meta分析。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010 Feb;198(2):116-24. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181cc41b6.
2
SSRIs versus non-SSRIs in post-traumatic stress disorder: an update with recommendations.创伤后应激障碍中选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与非选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的比较:最新进展及建议
Drugs. 2004;64(4):383-404. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464040-00004.
3
Impact of placebo arms on outcomes in antidepressant trials: systematic review and meta-regression analysis.安慰剂对照臂对抗抑郁药试验结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Oct 1;47(5):1454-1464. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy076.
4
Comparison of SSRIs and SNRIs in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of head-to-head randomized clinical trials.SSRIs 和 SNRIs 在重度抑郁症中的比较:头对头随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2010 Apr;35(2):177-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01050.x.
5
Psychological and pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental health problems following complex traumatic events: Systematic review and component network meta-analysis.复杂创伤性事件后创伤后应激障碍及共患精神健康问题的心理和药理学干预措施:系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 19;17(8):e1003262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003262. eCollection 2020 Aug.
6
Pharmacotherapies for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Meta-Analysis.创伤后应激障碍的药物治疗:一项荟萃分析。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016 May;204(5):331-8. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000478.
7
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for fibromyalgia syndrome.用于纤维肌痛综合征的选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 5;2015(6):CD011735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011735.
8
Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of depression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴发抑郁症的药物干预措施
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 19;12(12):CD012346. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012346.pub2.
9
Dropout rates in placebo-controlled and active-control clinical trials of antipsychotic drugs: a meta-analysis.抗精神病药物安慰剂对照和活性对照临床试验中的脱落率:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;62(12):1305-12. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.12.1305.
10
Dropout rates in randomized clinical trials of antipsychotics: a meta-analysis comparing first- and second-generation drugs and an examination of the role of trial design features.抗精神病药物随机临床试验中的脱落率:比较第一代和第二代药物的荟萃分析以及对试验设计特征作用的考察
Schizophr Bull. 2009 Jul;35(4):775-88. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn005. Epub 2008 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis.创伤后应激障碍的药物治疗:系统评价与荟萃分析
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2025 Jun 14;15:20451253251342628. doi: 10.1177/20451253251342628. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical, gut microbial and neural effects of a probiotic add-on therapy in depressed patients: a randomized controlled trial.益生菌辅助治疗对抑郁患者的临床、肠道微生物和神经影响:一项随机对照试验。
Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 3;12(1):227. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-01977-z.
3
Feasibility of Combining Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Active Fully Embodied Virtual Reality for Visual Height Intolerance: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study.
经颅直流电刺激与沉浸式主动虚拟现实相结合治疗视觉性身高不耐受的可行性:一项双盲随机对照研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 11;11(2):345. doi: 10.3390/jcm11020345.
4
Systematic review and meta analysis of differential attrition between active and control arms in randomized controlled trials of lifestyle interventions in chronic disease.系统评价和荟萃分析:随机对照试验中生活方式干预对慢性病的积极和对照组之间的差异脱落。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jun 14;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01313-x.
5
The prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms and their associations with quality of life among clinically stable older patients with psychiatric disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,临床稳定的老年精神障碍患者中抑郁和焦虑症状的流行率及其与生活质量的关系。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 26;11(1):75. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01196-y.
6
Race and cultural factors in an RCT of prolonged exposure and sertraline for PTSD.一项关于延长暴露疗法和舍曲林治疗创伤后应激障碍的随机对照试验中的种族和文化因素
Behav Res Ther. 2020 Sep;132:103690. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103690. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
7
Missing data in randomized controlled trials testing palliative interventions pose a significant risk of bias and loss of power: a systematic review and meta-analyses.测试姑息治疗干预措施的随机对照试验中的数据缺失会带来显著的偏倚风险和效能损失:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.003. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
8
Does D-cycloserine enhance exposure therapy for anxiety disorders in humans? A meta-analysis.D-环丝氨酸能否增强人类焦虑症的暴露疗法?一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 3;9(7):e93519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093519. eCollection 2014.
9
Striking a balance in communicating pharmacogenetic test results: promoting comprehension and minimizing adverse psychological and behavioral response.在传达药物遗传学检测结果时保持平衡:促进理解并尽量减少不良心理和行为反应。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Oct;97(1):10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
10
The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials.临床试验中缺失数据的预防与处理
N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 4;367(14):1355-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1203730.