• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1998年至2003年爱尔兰物理治疗实践中结果测量指标的使用情况及与加拿大趋势的比较。

Use of outcome measures in physiotherapy practice in ireland from 1998 to 2003 and comparison to canadian trends.

作者信息

Stokes Emma K, O'Neill Desmond

机构信息

Emma K. Stokes, Dip Stat, BSc (PT), MSc (research), PhD : Senior Lecturer, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Physiother Can. 2008 Spring;60(2):109-16. doi: 10.3138/physio.60.2.109. Epub 2008 Oct 10.

DOI:10.3138/physio.60.2.109
PMID:20145774
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2792806/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to examine changes in the use of standardized outcome measures by practising physiotherapists in Ireland and to compare those trends to the results of a similar survey conducted previously in Canada.

METHOD

A survey methodology was employed. The review of practice occurred at two points in time. Senior clinical physiotherapists working with older people participated. Questions were asked about the use of standardized outcome measures, the nature and pattern of their use, and the level of confidence the respondents had in using such measures.

RESULTS

The results chart the changes in practice over a 5-year period. Although there was an increase in the use of standardized outcome measures, the respondents acknowledged barriers to their systematic use in routine practice (e.g., lack of time, resources/administrative support). There was a lack of professional consensus on what instruments to use in general, as well as which to use for particular client groups. Concern was expressed that none of the available instruments met their clients' needs. Where possible and appropriate, comparison was made between the data from the 2003 Irish study and a survey of Canadian physiotherapists conducted in 1998.

CONCLUSION

This review of practice illustrates that changes that have occurred in Ireland in the use of standardized outcome measures are similar to those that have occurred in Canada, but barriers remain to their complete integration into clinical practice and clinical decision making.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查爱尔兰执业物理治疗师使用标准化结局指标的变化情况,并将这些趋势与之前在加拿大进行的类似调查结果进行比较。

方法

采用调查方法。在两个时间点对实践进行回顾。参与研究的是为老年人提供服务的资深临床物理治疗师。询问了有关标准化结局指标的使用情况、使用的性质和模式,以及受访者使用这些指标的信心水平。

结果

结果描绘了5年期间的实践变化。尽管标准化结局指标的使用有所增加,但受访者承认在常规实践中系统使用这些指标存在障碍(例如,缺乏时间、资源/行政支持)。对于一般使用哪些工具以及针对特定客户群体使用哪些工具,缺乏专业共识。有人担心现有的工具都无法满足他们客户的需求。在可能且合适的情况下,将2003年爱尔兰研究的数据与1998年对加拿大物理治疗师进行的一项调查的数据进行了比较。

结论

本次实践回顾表明,爱尔兰在标准化结局指标使用方面发生的变化与加拿大类似,但将这些指标完全整合到临床实践和临床决策中仍存在障碍。

相似文献

1
Use of outcome measures in physiotherapy practice in ireland from 1998 to 2003 and comparison to canadian trends.1998年至2003年爱尔兰物理治疗实践中结果测量指标的使用情况及与加拿大趋势的比较。
Physiother Can. 2008 Spring;60(2):109-16. doi: 10.3138/physio.60.2.109. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
2
Current use of measurement instruments by physiotherapists working in Germany: a cross-sectional online survey.德国物理治疗师当前对测量仪器的使用情况:一项横断面在线调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 23;18(1):810. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3563-2.
3
Perceptions of Leadership: Comparing Canadian and Irish Physiotherapists' Views.领导力认知:比较加拿大和爱尔兰物理治疗师的观点
Physiother Can. 2016;68(2):106-113. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2014-95.
4
Development of a physiotherapy prioritization tool in the Baffin Region of Nunavut: a remote, under-serviced area in the Canadian Arctic.努纳武特地区巴芬地区物理治疗优先排序工具的开发:加拿大北极地区一个偏远且服务不足的地区。
Rural Remote Health. 2010 Apr-Jun;10(2):1466. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
5
Physiotherapy after stroke in Ireland: a qualitative insight into the patients' and physiotherapists' experience.爱尔兰中风后的物理治疗:对患者和物理治疗师经历的质性洞察。
Int J Rehabil Res. 2009 Sep;32(3):238-44. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32832b083c.
6
Executive dysfunction post-stroke: an insight into the perspectives of physiotherapists.中风后执行功能障碍:对物理治疗师观点的洞察
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(20):1817-24. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.980915. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
7
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
A profile of physiotherapy supply in Ireland.爱尔兰物理治疗服务供应概况。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Feb;188(1):19-27. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1806-1. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
10
A survey of physiotherapists' experience using outcome measures in total hip and knee arthroplasty.一项关于物理治疗师在全髋关节和膝关节置换术中使用疗效指标的经验调查。
Physiother Can. 2014 Summer;66(3):274-85. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2013-34.

引用本文的文献

1
What factors are associated with physical therapists' use of patient-reported outcome measures in managing patients with low back pain in primary health care in Sweden?在瑞典的初级卫生保健中,哪些因素与物理治疗师在管理腰痛患者时使用患者报告的结局指标相关?
Braz J Phys Ther. 2025 Aug 12;29(6):101250. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101250.
2
Recommendations for a core assessment set for neurological physiotherapy entry-level education in Austria - a multistage process including a Delphi study.奥地利神经物理治疗入门级教育核心评估集的建议——一个包括德尔菲研究的多阶段过程
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 5;25(1):1145. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07704-8.
3
Editorial: Surface EMG and other measurement techniques in rehabilitation research and practice: are new educational programs needed?社论:康复研究与实践中的表面肌电图及其他测量技术:是否需要新的教育项目?
Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 Feb 14;6:1565879. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1565879. eCollection 2025.
4
Clinician-Prioritized Measures to Use in a Remote Concussion Assessment: Delphi Study.临床医生优先使用的远程 concussion 评估措施:德尔菲研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 2;8:e47246. doi: 10.2196/47246.
5
Experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study.物理治疗师对一套用于提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者护理质量的标准测量工具的经验:一项混合方法研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Jul 19;6(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00487-2.
6
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Arabic Version of Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ-Ar).跨文化调适与验证阿拉伯文版肌肉骨骼健康问卷(MSK-HQ-Ar)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 17;17(14):5168. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145168.
7
Colombian Physiotherapists' Use of Functional Outcome Measures in Their Practice.哥伦比亚物理治疗师在其实践中对功能结局测量指标的使用。
Physiother Can. 2019 Summer;71(3):239-249. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2018-31.
8
Estimating the Threshold Value for Change for the Six Dimensions of the Impairment Inventory of the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment.估算切多克-麦克马斯特中风评估损伤量表六个维度变化的阈值
Physiother Can. 2019 Spring;71(2):103-110. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2017-87.
9
Current use of measurement instruments by physiotherapists working in Germany: a cross-sectional online survey.德国物理治疗师当前对测量仪器的使用情况:一项横断面在线调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 23;18(1):810. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3563-2.
10
A comparative survey of Nigerian physiotherapists' familiarity with, knowledge of and utilisation of standard outcome measures: 10 years after initial survey.尼日利亚物理治疗师对标准结局指标的熟悉程度、了解情况及使用情况的比较调查:首次调查10年后
S Afr J Physiother. 2018 Jun 28;74(1):435. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v74i1.435. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcome measures measure outcomes, not effects of intervention.结果指标衡量的是结果,而非干预措施的效果。
Aust J Physiother. 2005;51(1):3-4. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(05)70047-7.
2
FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX.功能评估:巴氏指数
Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5.
3
Patient satisfaction with outpatient physical therapy: instrument validation.患者对门诊物理治疗的满意度:工具验证
Phys Ther. 2002 Jun;82(6):557-65.
4
The assessment of pain: an audit of physiotherapy practice.疼痛评估:物理治疗实践的一项审计
Aust J Physiother. 1996;42(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60441-4.
5
Current use of outcome measures for stroke and low back pain rehabilitation in five European countries: first results of the ACROSS project.五个欧洲国家目前在中风和腰痛康复中使用的疗效指标:ACROSS项目的初步结果。
Int J Rehabil Res. 2001 Jun;24(2):95-101. doi: 10.1097/00004356-200106000-00002.
6
The use of standardized outcome measures in rehabilitation centres in the UK.英国康复中心对标准化结果测量的使用。
Clin Rehabil. 1997 Nov;11(4):306-13. doi: 10.1177/026921559701100407.
7
Attitudes toward standardized data collection.对标准化数据收集的态度。
Phys Ther. 1997 Jul;77(7):714-29. doi: 10.1093/ptj/77.7.714.
8
The outcome of physiotherapy and its measurement.物理治疗的结果及其测量。
Physiotherapy. 1982 Nov 10;68(11):362-3.
9
A physical assessment for stroke patients.对中风患者的身体评估。
Physiotherapy. 1982 Apr;68(4):109-13.
10
Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness.神经功能受损患者的临床步态评估。可靠性与意义。
Phys Ther. 1984 Jan;64(1):35-40. doi: 10.1093/ptj/64.1.35.