• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中度至重度后天性脑损伤患者样本中神经心理评估量表筛查模块(NAB-SM)的信度和效度

Reliability and validity of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery-Screening Module (NAB-SM) in a sample of patients with moderate-to-severe acquired brain injury.

作者信息

Zgaljardic Dennis J, Temple Richard O

机构信息

Transitional Learning Center, Department of Neuropsychology, Galveston, Texas 77550, USA.

出版信息

Appl Neuropsychol. 2010 Jan;17(1):27-36. doi: 10.1080/09084280903297909.

DOI:10.1080/09084280903297909
PMID:20146119
Abstract

The Screening module from the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (NAB-SM; Stern & White, 2003) is a comprehensive cognitive screening measure that assesses five domains (Attention, Language, Memory, Spatial, and Executive Functions). The construct validity of the NAB-SM in comparison to established neuropsychological (NP) measures in individuals with moderate-to-severe brain injury has yet to be investigated. Participants were 42 individuals with acquired brain injury admitted to a post-acute residential rehabilitation program. The NAB-SM cognitive domain index scores demonstrated weak internal consistency, whereas internal consistency for the NAB-SM total index score was satisfactory. In demonstrating construct validity, the NAB-SM cognitive domain index scores and individual subtest scores maintained several significant relationships with other NP tests that shared test structure and content or not. These relationships were limited or absent for the NAB-SM Executive Functions subtests and the NAB-SM Shape Learning subtest. Our findings provide preliminary support for the reliability and validity of the NAB-SM in a sample of patients with moderate-to-severe brain injury.

摘要

神经心理评估量表(NAB-SM;斯特恩和怀特,2003年)的筛查模块是一种全面的认知筛查工具,用于评估五个领域(注意力、语言、记忆、空间和执行功能)。与中度至重度脑损伤患者中已有的神经心理学(NP)测量方法相比,NAB-SM的结构效度尚未得到研究。研究对象为42名入住急性后期住院康复项目的后天性脑损伤患者。NAB-SM认知领域指数得分显示出较弱的内部一致性,而NAB-SM总指数得分的内部一致性则令人满意。在证明结构效度方面,NAB-SM认知领域指数得分和各个子测验得分与其他NP测验保持着若干显著关系,无论这些NP测验是否与NAB-SM共享测验结构和内容。这些关系在NAB-SM执行功能子测验和NAB-SM形状学习子测验中有限或不存在。我们的研究结果为NAB-SM在中度至重度脑损伤患者样本中的信度和效度提供了初步支持。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery-Screening Module (NAB-SM) in a sample of patients with moderate-to-severe acquired brain injury.中度至重度后天性脑损伤患者样本中神经心理评估量表筛查模块(NAB-SM)的信度和效度
Appl Neuropsychol. 2010 Jan;17(1):27-36. doi: 10.1080/09084280903297909.
2
Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (NAB): Performance in a sample of patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.神经心理评估量表(NAB):中重度创伤性脑损伤患者样本的表现
Appl Neuropsychol. 2010 Oct;17(4):283-8. doi: 10.1080/09084282.2010.525118.
3
Ecological validity of the screening module and the Daily Living tests of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery using the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 in postacute brain injury rehabilitation.使用 Mayo-Portland 适应量表-4 对神经心理评估电池的筛选模块和日常生活测试在急性后期脑损伤康复中的生态有效性。
Rehabil Psychol. 2011 Nov;56(4):359-65. doi: 10.1037/a0025466. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
4
Construct validity of the Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) with acquired brain injury patients.后天性脑损伤患者神经心理状态可重复性成套测验(RBANS)的结构效度。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Mar;21(2):286-93. doi: 10.1080/13854040500376823.
5
Naming Test of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery: reliability and validity in a sample of patients with acquired brain injury.神经心理评估成套测验的命名测验:在后天性脑损伤患者样本中的信度和效度。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013 Dec;28(8):859-65. doi: 10.1093/arclin/act037. Epub 2013 May 27.
6
Criterion validity of the neuropsychological assessment battery after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后神经心理评估成套测验的效标效度。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 Jun;27(4):440-5. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acs043. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
7
Frequency of abnormal scores on the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery Screening Module (S-NAB) in a mixed neurological sample.
Appl Neuropsychol. 2007;14(3):178-82. doi: 10.1080/09084280701508952.
8
Ecological validity of the neuropsychological assessment battery screening module in post-acute brain injury rehabilitation.急性脑损伤后康复中神经心理评估电池筛查模块的生态效度
Brain Inj. 2009 Jan;23(1):45-50. doi: 10.1080/02699050802590361.
9
Validation of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery Screening Module (NAB-SM) in patients with traumatic brain injury.验证神经心理评估电池筛选模块(NAB-SM)在创伤性脑损伤患者中的应用。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Sep-Oct;29(5):1103-1111. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1852237. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
10
Validity and reliability of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery - Screening Module (S-NAB) in a subset of Malaysian population with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).神经心理评估量表 - 筛查模块(S-NAB)在马来西亚轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)人群子集中的有效性和可靠性。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2021 Jul-Aug;28(4):416-426. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1648264. Epub 2019 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in rates of impairment in adults who use methamphetamine using two sets of demographically corrected norms.使用两组经过人口统计学校正的标准来比较使用甲基苯丙胺的成年人的损伤率差异。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2025 Jan-Feb;32(1):216-224. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2022.2164197. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
2
Randomised controlled clinical trial of a structured cognitive rehabilitation in patients with attention deficit following mild traumatic brain injury: study protocol.轻度创伤性脑损伤后注意力缺陷患者结构化认知康复的随机对照临床试验:研究方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 18;9(9):e028711. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028711.
3
Modified cognitive behavioral therapy (M-CBT) for cocaine dependence: Development of treatment for cognitively impaired users and results from a Stage 1 trial.
改良认知行为疗法(M-CBT)治疗可卡因依赖:为认知障碍使用者开发治疗方法及 1 期试验结果。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2018 Nov;32(7):800-811. doi: 10.1037/adb0000398. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
4
Neuropsychological Assessment Battery-Screening Module (S-NAB): performance in treatment-seeking cocaine users.神经心理评估量表-筛查模块(S-NAB):寻求治疗的可卡因使用者的表现。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2014 Nov;40(6):476-83. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2014.916718. Epub 2014 Jun 20.