Pachet Arlin K
Brain Injury Program, Columbia Health Centres, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Mar;21(2):286-93. doi: 10.1080/13854040500376823.
The construct validity of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) indices and subtests in comparison to established neuropsychological measures has yet to be investigated in post-acute adults with a moderate to severe acquired brain injury. A sample of 37 patients from an inpatient brain injury rehabilitation program were administered the RBANS followed by a neuropsychological test battery approximately two weeks later. Significant relationships were observed between most of the RBANS subtests and indices and neuropsychological tests putatively assessing similar cognitive domains. These results provide preliminary support for the construct validity of the RBANS indices and subtests when used with moderate to severe acquired brain injury patients.
与既定的神经心理学测量方法相比，用于评估神经心理状态的可重复成套测验（RBANS）指标和子测验在中度至重度获得性脑损伤的急性后期成年人中的结构效度尚未得到研究。对来自住院脑损伤康复项目的37名患者进行了RBANS测验，大约两周后又进行了一组神经心理学测验。在大多数RBANS子测验和指标与假定评估相似认知领域的神经心理学测验之间观察到显著相关性。这些结果为RBANS指标和子测验在中度至重度获得性脑损伤患者中使用时的结构效度提供了初步支持。
