• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新泽西州分级驾驶许可计划评估。

Evaluation of New Jersey's graduated driver licensing program.

机构信息

Allan F. Williams LLC, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2010 Feb;11(1):1-7. doi: 10.1080/15389580903370047.

DOI:10.1080/15389580903370047
PMID:20146137
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate New Jersey's unique combination of a higher licensing age and a strong GDL system applicable to all novice drivers.

METHODS

Population-based crash rates for drivers of ages potentially affected by GDL were compared, pre- and post-GDL implementation, with those of adults ages 25-59, using data on fatal crashes and on all police-reported crashes.

RESULTS

After GDL implementation, there were statistically significant reductions in the crash rates of 17-year-olds, based on all reported crashes (16%), injury crashes (14%), and fatal crashes (25%), relative to those of drivers ages 25-59. The crash rates of 18-year-olds decreased significantly on the basis of all reported crashes (10%) and injury crashes (10%), relative to those of drivers ages 25-59. The fatal crash involvement rate of 18-year-olds decreased by 4 percent, which was not statistically significant. There was also a statistically significant reduction in fatal crashes of 16-year-old drivers; however, this is unlikely to have been attributable to GDL. Significant reductions in nighttime crashes (of all severity levels) of drivers ages 17 and 18 were observed, as were significant yet smaller reductions in their daytime crash rates. Reductions in fatal crashes of 17- and 18-year-olds carrying more than one passenger were sizable (23 and 24%, respectively) but were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

New Jersey's licensing age of 17 eliminates most crashes at age 16. To the extent that the relative inexperience of 17-year-old drivers may negatively impact their crash rates, this effect appears to be largely blunted by New Jersey's strong GDL system. New Jersey's GDL system also reduces crashes at age 18, an age group untouched by other states' GDL systems. New Jersey's combination of licensing policies for young drivers is a model for the nation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估新泽西州独特的组合,即较高的许可年龄和适用于所有新手驾驶员的强大 GDL 系统。

方法

使用致命碰撞和所有警方报告的碰撞数据,比较了潜在受 GDL 影响的驾驶员年龄的人群基础碰撞率,在 GDL 实施前后与 25-59 岁成年人的碰撞率进行比较。

结果

在 GDL 实施后,根据所有报告的碰撞(16%)、受伤碰撞(14%)和致命碰撞(25%),17 岁青少年的碰撞率显著降低,与 25-59 岁驾驶员相比。18 岁青少年的所有报告碰撞(10%)和受伤碰撞(10%)的碰撞率均显著下降,与 25-59 岁驾驶员相比。18 岁青少年致命碰撞发生率下降 4%,但无统计学意义。16 岁驾驶员致命碰撞发生率也显著下降;然而,这可能与 GDL 无关。观察到 17 岁和 18 岁驾驶员夜间碰撞(所有严重程度)显著减少,白天碰撞率也显著降低,但幅度较小。17 岁和 18 岁青少年载有一名以上乘客的致命碰撞减少幅度较大(分别为 23%和 24%),但无统计学意义。

结论

新泽西州的 17 岁许可年龄消除了 16 岁时的大多数碰撞。就 17 岁驾驶员相对缺乏经验可能对其碰撞率产生负面影响而言,这一影响似乎主要被新泽西州强大的 GDL 系统所削弱。新泽西州的 GDL 系统还降低了 18 岁年龄段的碰撞,而其他州的 GDL 系统并未触及这一年龄段。新泽西州对年轻驾驶员的许可政策组合是全国的典范。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of New Jersey's graduated driver licensing program.新泽西州分级驾驶许可计划评估。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2010 Feb;11(1):1-7. doi: 10.1080/15389580903370047.
2
Estimating young novice drivers' compliance with graduated driver licensing restrictions: A novel approach.评估年轻新手驾驶员对分级驾驶证限制规定的遵守情况:一种新方法。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Jan 2;18(1):35-40. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1171857. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
3
Evaluation of California's graduated driver licensing program.加利福尼亚分级驾驶员执照计划评估。
J Safety Res. 2004;35(5):523-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.08.006.
4
The effects of graduated driver licensing on hospitalization rates and charges for 16-and 17-year-olds in North Carolina.分级驾照制度对北卡罗来纳州16至17岁青少年住院率及费用的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2007 Mar;8(1):35-8. doi: 10.1080/15389580600863005.
5
Graduated driver licensing decal law: effect on young probationary drivers.分级驾照贴标法:对年轻实习驾驶员的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jan;44(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.041.
6
The impact of changes to the graduated driver licensing program in Queensland, Australia on the experiences of Learner drivers.澳大利亚昆士兰州驾驶员学习许可计划变更对驾驶员学习人员经历的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jul;43(4):1301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
7
Encouraging compliance with graduated driver licensing restrictions.鼓励遵守分级驾驶员执照限制规定。
J Safety Res. 2006;37(4):343-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2006.05.004. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
8
Implementation is not enough: Graduated drivers licensing benefits from a comprehensive enforcement, education, and awareness campaigns.实施还不够:驾驶员资格分级制度需要全面的执法、教育和宣传活动来获益。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Oct;85(4):704-710. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002018.
9
Graduated licensing and beyond.分级驾照及其他。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Sep;35(3 Suppl):S324-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.06.015.
10
Crash involvement during the different phases of the New Zealand Graduated Driver Licensing System (GDLS).在新西兰分级驾照制度(GDLS)的不同阶段涉及的碰撞事故。
J Safety Res. 2010 Aug;41(4):359-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Who's not driving among U.S. high school seniors: A closer look at race/ethnicity, socioeconomic factors, and driving status.美国高中高年级学生中谁不驾车:深入探讨种族/族裔、社会经济因素与驾车状况
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Nov 16;17(8):803-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1161761. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
3
Teen Crashes Declined After Massachusetts Raised Penalties For Graduated Licensing Law Restricting Night Driving.
在马萨诸塞州提高了对限制夜间驾驶的分级驾照法的处罚力度后,青少年车祸事故有所减少。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jun;34(6):963-70. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0928.
4
Graduated Driver Licensing: An international review.分级驾照制度:一项国际综述。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2014 Nov;14(4):e432-41. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
5
Preventing alcohol-related problems through health policy research.通过健康政策研究预防与酒精相关的问题。
Alcohol Res Health. 2010;33(1-2):18-28.