Percy FitzPatrick Institute, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.
Biol Lett. 2010 Aug 23;6(4):498-501. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0913. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
No-take zones may protect populations of targeted marine species and restore the integrity of marine ecosystems, but it is unclear whether they benefit top predators that rely on mobile pelagic fishes. In South Africa, foraging effort of breeding African penguins decreased by 30 per cent within three months of closing a 20 km zone to the competing purse-seine fisheries around their largest colony. After the fishing ban, most of the penguins from this island had shifted their feeding effort inside the closed area. Birds breeding at another colony situated 50 km away, whose fishing grounds remained open to fishing, increased their foraging effort during the same period. This demonstrates the immediate benefit of a relatively small no-take zone for a marine top predator relying on pelagic prey. Selecting such small protected areas may be an important first conservation step, minimizing stakeholder conflicts and easing compliance, while ensuring benefit for the ecosystems within these habitats.
禁捕区可以保护目标海洋物种的种群并恢复海洋生态系统的完整性,但目前尚不清楚它们是否有利于依赖洄游性鱼类的顶级捕食者。在南非,繁殖期的非洲企鹅觅食活动在其最大的繁殖地周围的刺网渔业关闭了 20 公里的禁渔区后三个月内减少了 30%。禁渔令实施后,该岛上的大多数企鹅将觅食努力转移到了封闭区域内。另一个位于 50 公里之外的繁殖地的企鹅,其捕鱼区仍然对捕鱼开放,在同一时期增加了觅食努力。这表明,对于依赖海洋猎物的海洋顶级捕食者来说,一个相对较小的禁捕区可以立即带来好处。选择这样的小保护区可能是重要的第一步,它可以最小化利益相关者之间的冲突,便于遵守规定,同时确保这些栖息地内的生态系统受益。