Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine Unit, Université Catholique de Louvain, Unité de Réadaptation, Tour Pasteur 5375, Avenue Mounier 53, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Eur Spine J. 2010 Jul;19(7):1179-88. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1292-2. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
For patients whose scoliosis progresses, surgery remains the ultimate way to correct and stabilise the deformity while maintaining as many mobile spinal segments as possible. In thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), the spinal fusion has to be extended to the lumbar spine. The use of anterior spinal fusion (ASF) instead of the classic posterior fusion (PSF) may preserve more distal spinal levels in attempt to limit the consequences of surgery on trunk mobility. The effects of surgery on body shape, pain and the decompensation phenomenon have all been well evaluated. Very few studies have addressed the effect of ASF or PSF on basic activities, such as walking. Before any treatment, AIS patients already have reduced pelvis, hip and shoulder motion when walking at a normal speed compared with adolescents without scoliosis (control group). Additionally, they have longer contraction time of the lumbar and pelvic muscles leading to an excessive energy cost and reduced muscle efficiency. In addition, if these changes are associated with spinal stiffness, spinal fusion could further negatively affect this pre-surgical inefficient walk. The goals of this study were (a) to compare pre- and 1-year post-surgery conditions in order to assess the effects of spinal arthrodesis on gait parameters and (b) to compare the anterior versus the posterior surgical approaches. Nineteen young females with thoracolumbar/lumbar AIS were assessed by radiological and clinical examination and by conventional gait analysis before surgery and at almost 12 months after surgery. Seven subjects underwent surgery using ASF and 12 using PSF. Three-dimensional gait analysis was performed on a motor-driven treadmill at spontaneous self-selected speed to record kinematic, electromyographic (EMG), mechanical and energetic measurements synchronously. Although it was expected that the instrumentation would modify the characteristics of normal walking, this study showed that surgery does not induce asymmetric gait or any significant differences between the ASP and the PSF surgery groups. One year after surgery, the changes observed consisted of improvements in the gait and mechanical parameters. In the PSF group, 11-14 vertebrae were fused while only 3-4 were fused in the ASF group. In both AIS groups, step length was increased by 4% and cadence reduced by 2%. There was a slight increase in pelvis and hip frontal motion. Only the transverse shoulder motion was mildly decreased by 1.5 degrees . All the other gait parameters were left unchanged or were improved by surgery. Notably, the EMG timing activity did not change. The total muscular mechanical work (W (tot)) increased by 6% mainly due to the external work (W (ext)), i.e. the work performed by the body muscles to move the body in its surroundings. The energy cost, although showing a tendency towards a reduction, remained globally excessive, probably due to the excessive co-contraction of the lumbo-pelvic muscles.
对于脊柱侧弯进展的患者,手术仍然是纠正和稳定畸形的最终方法,同时尽可能保留更多的活动脊柱节段。在胸腰椎/腰椎青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)中,脊柱融合必须延伸至腰椎。与经典的后路融合(PSF)相比,前路脊柱融合(ASF)的使用可能会保留更远端的脊柱节段,试图限制手术对躯干活动度的影响。手术对体型、疼痛和代偿现象的影响都得到了很好的评估。很少有研究涉及 ASF 或 PSF 对基本活动(如行走)的影响。在任何治疗之前,与没有脊柱侧凸的青少年(对照组)相比,AIS 患者在正常速度行走时已经表现出骨盆、髋关节和肩部运动减少。此外,他们的腰椎和骨盆肌肉收缩时间更长,导致能量消耗过多和肌肉效率降低。此外,如果这些变化与脊柱僵硬有关,脊柱融合可能会进一步对这种术前低效的行走产生负面影响。本研究的目的是:(a)比较术前和术后 1 年的情况,以评估脊柱融合对步态参数的影响;(b)比较前路与后路手术方法。19 名胸腰椎/腰椎 AIS 年轻女性通过影像学和临床检查以及常规步态分析进行评估,在术前和术后近 12 个月进行评估。7 例患者接受 ASF 手术,12 例患者接受 PSF 手术。在自动驱动的跑步机上以自发选择的速度进行三维步态分析,同步记录运动学、肌电图(EMG)、力学和能量测量。尽管预计仪器会改变正常行走的特征,但本研究表明,手术不会导致不对称步态或 ASP 和 PSF 手术组之间出现任何显著差异。术后 1 年,观察到的变化包括步态和力学参数的改善。在 PSF 组中,融合了 11-14 个椎体,而在 ASF 组中仅融合了 3-4 个椎体。在 AIS 两组中,步长增加了 4%,步速降低了 2%。骨盆和髋关节额状面运动略有增加。只有横向肩部运动轻度减少 1.5 度。所有其他步态参数均保持不变或通过手术得到改善。值得注意的是,EMG 时间活动没有改变。总肌肉机械功(W (tot))增加了 6%,主要是由于外部功(W (ext)),即身体肌肉为在周围环境中移动身体而做功。能量消耗虽然有减少的趋势,但仍过高,可能是由于腰骨盆肌肉过度共同收缩所致。