Suppr超能文献

新的糖尿病 HEDIS 血压质量衡量标准:过度治疗的可能性。

New diabetes HEDIS blood pressure quality measure: potential for overtreatment.

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, 4260 Plymouth Rd, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jan;16(1):19-24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine reasons for failing to meet the new Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) blood pressure (BP) measure for diabetes patients (BP <130/80 mm Hg), which may not accurately identify poor-quality care and could promote overtreatment through its performance incentives.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

We formed 2 cohorts of diabetes patients in 9 general medicine clinics in an academic healthcare system. Cohort A (n = 124) failed the new HEDIS measure but passed the old measure (systolic blood pressure [SBP] 130-139 and diastolic blood pressure [DBP] <90 mm Hg; or SBP <140 and DBP 80-89 mm Hg). Cohort B (n = 125) failed the old measure (SBP > or = 140 and/ or DBP > or = 90). We reviewed medical records to ascertain clinician response to elevated BP.

RESULTS

Physicians documented treatment changes in only 4% and 28% of cohort A and B patients, respectively. Refractory systolic hypertension was common in those aged > or = 65 years; 60% of those in cohort B and 58% in cohort A took 3 or more antihypertensive medications and/or had a diastolic BP below 70 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a substantial cohort of elderly diabetes patients with DBP <70 mm Hg who were on 3 medications at adequate doses, but who did not meet the current performance measurement criteria (140/90 or 130/80 mm Hg). We suggest that such patients be excluded from performance measures, or if included, be noted for special attention by clinicians to balance intensification with risk.

摘要

目的

研究未能达到新的医疗保健效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)糖尿病患者血压(BP)测量值(BP<130/80mmHg)的原因,这可能无法准确识别治疗质量差的情况,并可能通过其绩效激励措施促进过度治疗。

研究设计

回顾性图表审查。

方法

我们在学术医疗系统的 9 个普通内科诊所形成了 2 个糖尿病患者队列。队列 A(n=124)未通过新的 HEDIS 测量值,但通过了旧的测量值(收缩压[SBP]130-139 和舒张压[DBP]<90mmHg;或 SBP<140 和 DBP 80-89mmHg)。队列 B(n=125)未通过旧的测量值(SBP>或=140 和/或 DBP>或=90)。我们审查了病历,以确定临床医生对升高的 BP 的反应。

结果

只有 4%和 28%的队列 A 和 B 患者的医生记录了治疗变化。高龄患者(>或=65 岁)中常见难治性收缩期高血压;60%的队列 B 患者和 58%的队列 A 患者服用了 3 种或更多种降压药物,或舒张压低于 70mmHg。

结论

我们发现了一个相当数量的老年糖尿病患者,其 DBP<70mmHg,且服用了足够剂量的 3 种药物,但不符合当前的绩效测量标准(140/90 或 130/80mmHg)。我们建议将这些患者排除在绩效评估之外,或者如果包括在内,则由临床医生特别注意平衡强化治疗与风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验