• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者血压管理的监测效果:好事过头了?

Monitoring performance for blood pressure management among patients with diabetes mellitus: too much of a good thing?

作者信息

Kerr Eve A, Lucatorto Michelle A, Holleman Rob, Hogan Mary M, Klamerus Mandi L, Hofer Timothy P

机构信息

Center for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48113-0170, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jun 25;172(12):938-45. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2253.

DOI:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2253
PMID:22641246
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3699173/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Performance measures that reward achieving blood pressure (BP) thresholds may contribute to overtreatment. We developed a tightly linked clinical action measure designed to encourage appropriate medical management and a marker of potential overtreatment, designed to monitor overly aggressive treatment of hypertension in the face of low diastolic BP.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in 879 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers and smaller community-based outpatient clinics. The clinical action measure for hypertension was met if the patient had a passing index BP at the visit or had an appropriate action. We examined the rate of passing the action measure and of potential overtreatment in the Veterans Health Administration during 2009-2010.

RESULTS

There were 977,282 established VA patients, 18 years and older, with diabetes mellitus (DM). A total of 713,790 patients were eligible for the action measure; 94% passed the measure (82% because they had a BP <140/90 mm Hg at the visit and an additional 12% with a BP ≥140/90 mm Hg and appropriate clinical actions). Facility pass rates varied from 77% to 99% (P < .001). Among all patients with DM, 197,291 (20%) had a BP lower than 130/65 mm Hg; of these, 80 903 (8% of all patients with DM) had potential overtreatment. Facility rates of potential overtreatment varied from 3% to 20% (P < .001). Facilities with higher rates of meeting the current threshold measure (<140/90 mm Hg) had higher rates of potential overtreatment (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

While 94% of diabetic veterans met the action measure, rates of potential overtreatment are currently approaching the rate of undertreatment, and high rates of achieving current threshold measures are directly associated with overtreatment. Implementing a clinical action measure for hypertension management, as the Veterans Health Administration is planning to do, may result in more appropriate care and less overtreatment.

摘要

背景

奖励达到血压(BP)阈值的绩效指标可能导致过度治疗。我们制定了一项紧密关联的临床行动指标,旨在鼓励适当的医疗管理,并制定了一个潜在过度治疗的标志物,用于监测在舒张压较低情况下对高血压的过度积极治疗。

方法

我们在879个退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗中心和较小的社区门诊诊所进行了一项回顾性队列研究。如果患者在就诊时有合格的索引血压或采取了适当的行动,则高血压的临床行动指标达标。我们检查了2009 - 2010年退伍军人健康管理局中行动指标达标的比率以及潜在过度治疗的比率。

结果

有977,282名18岁及以上患有糖尿病(DM)的VA在册患者。共有713,790名患者符合行动指标;94%的患者达标(82%是因为他们在就诊时血压<140/90 mmHg,另外12%的患者血压≥140/90 mmHg且有适当的临床行动)。各医疗机构的达标率从77%到99%不等(P <.001)。在所有糖尿病患者中,197,291名(20%)的血压低于130/65 mmHg;其中,80,903名(占所有糖尿病患者的8%)存在潜在过度治疗。各医疗机构的潜在过度治疗率从3%到20%不等(P <.001)。达到当前阈值指标(<140/90 mmHg)比率较高的医疗机构,其潜在过度治疗率也较高(P <.001)。

结论

虽然94%的糖尿病退伍军人达到了行动指标,但目前潜在过度治疗率正接近治疗不足率,并且达到当前阈值指标的高比率与过度治疗直接相关。正如退伍军人健康管理局计划实施的那样,实施高血压管理的临床行动指标可能会带来更适当的治疗并减少过度治疗。

相似文献

1
Monitoring performance for blood pressure management among patients with diabetes mellitus: too much of a good thing?糖尿病患者血压管理的监测效果:好事过头了?
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jun 25;172(12):938-45. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2253.
2
Rates of Deintensification of Blood Pressure and Glycemic Medication Treatment Based on Levels of Control and Life Expectancy in Older Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.基于糖尿病老年患者的控制水平和预期寿命的血压和血糖药物治疗的弱化率
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1942-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5110.
3
Assessing appropriateness of lipid management among patients with diabetes mellitus: moving from target to treatment.评估糖尿病患者血脂管理的适宜性:从目标到治疗
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Jan 1;6(1):66-74. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.966697. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
4
New diabetes HEDIS blood pressure quality measure: potential for overtreatment.新的糖尿病 HEDIS 血压质量衡量标准:过度治疗的可能性。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jan;16(1):19-24.
5
Facility-level variation in diabetes and blood pressure control in patients with diabetes: Findings from the Veterans Affairs national database.糖尿病患者中糖尿病及血压控制的机构层面差异:来自退伍军人事务部国家数据库的研究结果
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Nov;40(11):1055-1060. doi: 10.1002/clc.22769. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
6
A Cross-Sectional Study of Overtreatment and Deintensification of Antidiabetic and Antihypertensive Medications in Diabetes Mellitus: The TEMD Overtreatment Study.糖尿病中抗糖尿病和抗高血压药物过度治疗与去强化治疗的横断面研究:TEMD过度治疗研究
Diabetes Ther. 2020 May;11(5):1045-1059. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00779-0. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
7
Potential overtreatment and undertreatment of diabetes in different patient age groups in primary care after the introduction of performance measures.引入绩效措施后,初级保健中不同年龄段患者的糖尿病潜在过度治疗和治疗不足。
Diabetes Care. 2014;37(5):1312-20. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1861. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
8
Identification of outliers and positive deviants for healthcare improvement: looking for high performers in hypoglycemia safety in patients with diabetes.识别异常值和正向偏差以改善医疗保健:寻找糖尿病患者低血糖安全方面的高绩效者。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 16;17(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2692-3.
9
Blood pressure control and physician management of hypertension in hospital hypertension units in Spain.西班牙医院高血压科室的血压控制及高血压的医生管理
Hypertension. 2004 Jun;43(6):1338-44. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000127424.59774.84. Epub 2004 Apr 26.
10
A clinically guided approach for improving performance measurement for hypertension.一种提高高血压绩效管理的临床指导方法。
Med Care. 2012 May;50(5):399-405. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318245a147.

引用本文的文献

1
Focus and features of prescribing indications spanning multiple chronic conditions in older adults: A narrative review.老年人多种慢性病处方适应症的重点与特征:一项叙述性综述
J Multimorb Comorb. 2021 Apr 28;11:26335565211012876. doi: 10.1177/26335565211012876. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
2
Evaluating alternative methods of comparing antihypertensive treatment intensity.评估比较抗高血压治疗强度的替代方法。
Am J Manag Care. 2022 May 1;28(5):e157-e162. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.89146.
3
Direct-to-consumer strategies to promote deprescribing in primary care: a pilot study.

本文引用的文献

1
Diabetes performance measures: current status and future directions.糖尿病绩效指标:现状与未来方向。
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jul;34(7):1651-9. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0735.
2
Measuring blood pressure for decision making and quality reporting: where and how many measures?测量血压以做出决策和报告质量:测量多少个部位和多少次?
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jun 21;154(12):781-8, W-289-90. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-12-201106210-00005.
3
ACCF/AHA/AMA-PCPI 2011 performance measures for adults with coronary artery disease and hypertension: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and the American Medical Association-Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement.
在基层医疗中促进减药的直接面向消费者策略:一项试点研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Mar 22;23(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01655-5.
4
Intensification of Diabetes Medications at Hospital Discharge and Clinical Outcomes in Older Adults in the Veterans Administration Health System.在退伍军人管理局医疗系统中,老年患者出院时强化糖尿病药物治疗与临床结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128998. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28998.
5
Older Age, Polypharmacy, and Low Systolic Blood Pressure Are Associated With More Hypotension-Related Adverse Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Antihypertensives.在接受抗高血压药物治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,高龄、多种药物联合使用和收缩压降低与更多的低血压相关不良事件有关。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Sep 24;12:728911. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.728911. eCollection 2021.
6
Sustained Benefit of Alternate Behavioral Interventions to Improve Hypertension Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial.交替行为干预改善高血压控制的持续获益:一项随机临床试验。
Hypertension. 2021 Jun;77(6):1867-1876. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15192. Epub 2021 May 12.
7
A Method to Quantify Mean Hypertension Treatment Daily Dose Intensity Using Health Care System Data.一种利用医疗保健系统数据量化平均高血压治疗每日剂量强度的方法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2034059. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.34059.
8
Validation of a Health System Measure to Capture Intensive Medication Treatment of Hypertension in the Veterans Health Administration.验证一种卫生系统措施,以捕捉退伍军人健康管理局中高血压的强化药物治疗。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e205417. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5417.
9
Prevalence of Diabetes Medication Intensifications in Older Adults Discharged From US Veterans Health Administration Hospitals.老年患者从美国退伍军人事务部医院出院后的糖尿病药物强化治疗的流行率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201511. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1511.
10
Association Between Early Hypertension Control and Cardiovascular Disease Incidence in Veterans With Diabetes.糖尿病退伍军人中早期高血压控制与心血管疾病发病率的关系。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Oct;42(10):1995-2003. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0686.
美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会绩效指标特别工作组及美国医学协会-医师绩效改进联盟发布的《2011年冠心病和高血压成人患者ACCF/AHA/AMA-PCPI绩效指标报告》
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jul 12;58(3):316-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
4
Blood pressure lowering in patients with diabetes--one level might not fit all.糖尿病患者的降压治疗——并非一种方法适用于所有人。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Jan;8(1):42-9. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.182. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
5
Blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial.退伍军人事务糖尿病试验中的血压和心血管疾病风险。
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34(1):34-8. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1420. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
6
Tight blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes among hypertensive patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease.高血压合并糖尿病和冠状动脉疾病患者的严格血压控制与心血管结局。
JAMA. 2010 Jul 7;304(1):61-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.884.
7
Variation in the net benefit of aggressive cardiovascular risk factor control across the US population of patients with diabetes mellitus.美国糖尿病患者群体中积极控制心血管危险因素的净效益差异。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jun 28;170(12):1037-44. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.150.
8
US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988-2008.美国高血压的患病率、知晓率、治疗率和控制率趋势,1988-2008 年。
JAMA. 2010 May 26;303(20):2043-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.650.
9
Informed consent to promote patient-centered care.知情同意以促进以患者为中心的医疗。
JAMA. 2010 Mar 24;303(12):1190-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.309.
10
Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.强化血压控制对 2 型糖尿病的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 29;362(17):1575-85. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001286. Epub 2010 Mar 14.