Bozbaş Serife Savaş, Bozbaş Hüseyin, Atar Asli, Ulubay Gaye, Oner Eyüboğlu Füsun
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2010 Feb;10(1):43-9.
Pulmonary hypertension (PHT) is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Interest has increased in the use of drugs that, because of their neurohumoral inhibitory effects, inhibit the renin angiotensin system. In this study, we sought to examine whether losartan therapy is non-inferior to nifedipine in the treatment of secondary PHT.
This prospective randomized study consisted of 63 patients (mean age, 63.7+/- 9.1 years) with PHT who underwent Doppler echocardiographic examination. A baseline 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) were performed, and the endothelin-1 level of each patient was measured. Patients were assigned to two groups receiving treatment with nifedipine (n=30) and losartan (n=33). After 2 months of treatment, those measurements were repeated. The groups were compared with regard to effectiveness for the studied parameters using 2*2 factorial ANOVA design for repeated measurements.
When posttreatment values were compared with baseline values in both groups, the following statistically significant changes were noted: the mean values of both mean and systolic pulmonary artery pressures (PAPs) were reduced (p<0.05) on Doppler echocardiography; exercise duration, work rate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure (PETCO2) were higher (p<0.05 for all); and the minute ventilation (VE) and ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide (VE/VCO2) were lower (p<0.05 for both) according to the results of a CPET. No statistically significant change was noted in the mean levels of serum endothelin-1. With regard to the results cited above, no statistically significant difference was detected between the losartan and nifedipine groups (p>0.05).
The findings of this study indicate that losartan is non-inferior to nifedipine for reducing PAP and improving exercise capacity. However, the short-term use of losartan or nifedipine had no statistically significant effect on endothelin-1 levels in patients with secondary PHT.
肺动脉高压(PHT)与高死亡率和高发病率相关。由于具有神经体液抑制作用而抑制肾素血管紧张素系统的药物的使用受到了更多关注。在本研究中,我们试图检验氯沙坦治疗继发性PHT是否不劣于硝苯地平。
这项前瞻性随机研究纳入了63例接受多普勒超声心动图检查的PHT患者(平均年龄63.7±9.1岁)。进行了基线6分钟步行试验(6MWT)和心肺运动试验(CPET),并测量了每位患者的内皮素-1水平。患者被分为两组,分别接受硝苯地平治疗(n = 30)和氯沙坦治疗(n = 33)。治疗2个月后,重复进行上述测量。采用2×2析因方差分析设计对重复测量的数据进行分析,比较两组在研究参数方面的有效性。
将两组治疗后的数值与基线值进行比较时,发现了以下具有统计学意义的变化:多普勒超声心动图显示平均肺动脉压(PAP)和收缩期肺动脉压的平均值均降低(p<0.05);根据CPET结果,运动持续时间、工作率和呼气末二氧化碳分压(PETCO2)升高(均p<0.05);分钟通气量(VE)和二氧化碳通气当量(VE/VCO2)降低(均p<0.05)。血清内皮素-1的平均水平未发现有统计学意义的变化。就上述结果而言,氯沙坦组和硝苯地平组之间未检测到统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。
本研究结果表明,氯沙坦在降低PAP和改善运动能力方面不劣于硝苯地平。然而,短期使用氯沙坦或硝苯地平对继发性PHT患者的内皮素-1水平无统计学显著影响。