Suppr超能文献

儿童特定气道阻力参考方程:英国哮喘协会倡议。

Reference equations for specific airway resistance in children: the Asthma UK initiative.

机构信息

Portex Respiratory Unit, University College London, Institute of Child Health, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 2010 Sep;36(3):622-9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00135909. Epub 2010 Feb 11.

Abstract

Plethysmographic specific airway resistance (sR(aw)) is a useful research method for discriminating lung disease in young children. Its use in clinical management has, however, been limited by lack of consensus regarding equipment, methodology and reference data. The aim of our study was to collate reference data from healthy children (3-10 yrs), document methodological differences, explore the impact of these differences and construct reference equations from the collated dataset. Centres were approached to contribute sR(aw) data as part of the Asthma UK initiative. A random selection of pressure-flow plots were assessed for quality and site visits elucidated data collection and analysis protocols. Five centres contributed 2,872 measurements. Marked variation in methodology and analysis excluded two centres. sR(aw) over-read sheets were developed for quality control. Reference equations and recommendations for recording and reporting both specific effective and total airway resistance (sR(eff) and sR(tot), respectively) were developed for White European children from 1,908 measurements made under similar conditions. Reference sR(aw) data collected from a single centre may be misleading, as methodological differences exist between centres. These preliminary reference equations can only be applied under similar measurement conditions. Given the potential clinical usefulness of sR(aw), particularly with respect to sR(eff), methodological guidelines need to be established and used in prospective data collection.

摘要

体描记法特定气道阻力(sR(aw))是鉴别幼儿肺部疾病的一种有用的研究方法。然而,由于设备、方法和参考数据缺乏共识,其在临床管理中的应用受到限制。我们的研究目的是从健康儿童(3-10 岁)中收集参考数据,记录方法学差异,探讨这些差异的影响,并从整理的数据集中构建参考方程。我们邀请各中心作为英国哮喘协会倡议的一部分,提供 sR(aw)数据。随机选择压力-流量图进行质量评估,并进行现场访问以阐明数据收集和分析方案。五个中心贡献了 2872 次测量。由于方法学和分析存在明显差异,两个中心被排除在外。制定了 sR(aw) 过录表用于质量控制。根据在类似条件下进行的 1908 次测量,为白种欧洲儿童制定了 sR(eff)和 sR(tot)的参考方程和记录报告建议。从单个中心收集的参考 sR(aw)数据可能具有误导性,因为中心之间存在方法学差异。这些初步参考方程只能在类似的测量条件下应用。鉴于 sR(aw)具有潜在的临床应用价值,特别是在 sR(eff)方面,需要制定方法学指南并在前瞻性数据收集过程中使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验