Sección de Saneamiento Ambiental, Departamento de Ingeniería Civil y Agrícola, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Water Sci Technol. 2010;61(3):555-61. doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.856.
Ammonia volatilisation has generally been reported as, or assumed to be, the main nitrogen removal mechanism in waste stabilisation ponds (WSP). Nitrogen removal via ammonia volatilisation is based on two observations: (a) in-pond pH values can reach high values (>9, even >10), so increasing the proportion of the total ammonia present as the un-ionized form or free ammonia (NH(3)); and (b) in-pond temperatures can also be high, so improving the mass transfer rate of free ammonia to the atmosphere. Consequently, one of the most widely accepted models for ammonia removal in WSP is that reported by Pano & Middlebrooks in 1982, which was developed to reflect the occurrence of these two observations. This work reports how simple mathematical models for ammonia volatilisation in WSP, in spite of the possibility of their giving good predictions, may not accurately describe the main pathways and mechanisms involved in ammonia removal in WSP.
氨挥发通常被认为是或被假定为废物稳定塘(WSP)中氮去除的主要机制。通过氨挥发去除氮基于两个观察结果:(a)池塘内的 pH 值可以达到很高的值(>9,甚至>10),从而增加了总氨的比例以未离解形式或游离氨(NH(3))存在;(b)池塘内的温度也可以很高,从而提高了游离氨向大气的传质速率。因此,WSP 中氨去除最广泛接受的模型之一是 Pano 和 Middlebrooks 于 1982 年报告的模型,该模型的开发反映了这两个观察结果的发生。这项工作报告了尽管简单的 WSP 氨挥发数学模型可能会给出很好的预测,但它们可能无法准确描述 WSP 中氨去除的主要途径和机制。