• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将认知偏差应用于多发性硬化症老年患者的预测试患者报告结局。

Applying cognitive debriefing to pre-test patient-reported outcomes in older people with multiple sclerosis.

机构信息

Clinical Research, Rehabilitation Program, Eastern Health Authority, L.A. Miller Centre, 100 Forest Rd., St. John's, NL, Canada.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):483-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9602-z. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-010-9602-z
PMID:20151208
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to reduce respondent burden and decrease data errors in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) intended for a postal survey measuring health and lifestyle factors that may affect quality of life in older people with multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

Participants (n = 18) were recruited from a database of outpatient visits. Using the qualitative diagnostic method, cognitive debriefing, participants completed five standardized questionnaires; Frenchay Activities Index, Barthel Index, Simple Lifestyle Indicator Questionnaire, EuroQoL EQ-5D and Personal Resources Questionnaire 2000. PRO item issues and respondent behaviors such as skipping items were recorded. Data collection was an iterative process whereby difficulties experienced by 2-3 subjects were used to modify the survey for following respondents until data saturation was reached.

RESULTS

Most respondents had serious difficulties with at least one PRO item. Response errors fell into three main categories: (1) respondents did not read instructions and completed the item incorrectly, (2) respondents did not understand the question and required examples to clarify and (3) respondents felt that the pre-determined response options did not apply to them. PRO reformatting, minor modifications to item wording and addition of item examples improved precision and reduced respondent burden.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the notion that methods such as cognitive debriefing help improve precision of self-reported measures in a special population such as ours.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在减少邮寄调查中用于测量可能影响多发性硬化症(MS)老年患者生活质量的健康和生活方式因素的患者报告结局(PRO)的应答者负担和数据错误。

方法

参与者(n=18)从门诊就诊数据库中招募。使用定性诊断方法认知性访谈,参与者完成了五个标准化问卷:Frenchay 活动指数、Barthel 指数、简单生活方式指标问卷、EuroQoL EQ-5D 和个人资源问卷 2000。记录了 PRO 项目问题和应答者行为,如跳题。数据收集是一个迭代过程,通过对 2-3 名受试者遇到的困难进行修改,以适应后续受试者的调查,直到达到数据饱和。

结果

大多数应答者至少有一个 PRO 项目存在严重困难。回答错误分为三类:(1)应答者未阅读说明并错误完成项目;(2)应答者不理解问题,需要示例来澄清;(3)应答者认为预定义的应答选项不适用。PRO 重新格式化、对项目措辞进行微小修改并添加项目示例,提高了准确性并减轻了应答者负担。

结论

我们的发现支持这样一种观点,即认知性访谈等方法有助于提高我们这样的特殊人群中自我报告测量的准确性。

相似文献

1
Applying cognitive debriefing to pre-test patient-reported outcomes in older people with multiple sclerosis.将认知偏差应用于多发性硬化症老年患者的预测试患者报告结局。
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):483-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9602-z. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
2
Is the EQ-5D fit for purpose in asthma? Acceptability and content validity from the patient perspective.EQ-5D 在哮喘中的适用性如何?从患者角度看可接受性和内容效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Aug 3;16(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0970-3.
3
Group cognitive rehabilitation to reduce the psychological impact of multiple sclerosis on quality of life: the CRAMMS RCT.团体认知康复对多发性硬化症患者生活质量的心理影响的随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jan;24(4):1-182. doi: 10.3310/hta24040.
4
Predicting the EuroQol Group's EQ-5D index from CDC's "Healthy Days" in a US sample.预测美国样本中疾病预防控制中心“健康天数”与欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)指数的关系。
Med Decis Making. 2011 Jan-Feb;31(1):174-85. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10364845. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
5
Development and Validation of the FSIQ-RMS: A New Patient-Reported Questionnaire to Assess Symptoms and Impacts of Fatigue in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.FSIQ-RMS 的制定与验证:一种新的患者报告问卷,用于评估复发型多发性硬化症的疲劳症状和影响。
Value Health. 2019 Apr;22(4):453-466. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.11.007. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
6
Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: development of a patient-based measure of outcome.改善多发性硬化症治疗干预措施的评估:基于患者的结局指标的开发。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Mar;8(9):iii, 1-48. doi: 10.3310/hta8090.
7
Assessing the health of the general population in England: how do the three- and five-level versions of EQ-5D compare?评估英格兰普通人群的健康状况:EQ-5D的三级版本和五级版本对比情况如何?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Oct 21;13:171. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0356-8.
8
Measurement properties of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in recording self-reported health status in older patients with substantial multimorbidity and polypharmacy.EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L 在记录有大量合并症和多种药物治疗的老年患者自报健康状况方面的测量性能。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Sep 29;18(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01564-0.
9
A self-management programme to reduce falls and improve safe mobility in people with secondary progressive MS: the BRiMS feasibility RCT.一项旨在减少继发性进展型多发性硬化症患者跌倒和提高安全移动能力的自我管理计划:BRiMS 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jun;23(27):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta23270.
10
Health Utilities for Multiple Sclerosis.多发性硬化症的健康效用
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):460-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding data visualization techniques in qualitative studies used to develop and validate patient-reported outcome measures: a targeted literature review.理解用于开发和验证患者报告结局指标的定性研究中的数据可视化技术:一项针对性文献综述。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03964-5.
2
Cognitive interviewing for assessing the content validity of older-person specific outcome measures for quality assessment and economic evaluation: a scoping review.用于评估老年人特定结局指标在质量评估和经济评估中的内容效度的认知访谈:一项范围综述
Qual Life Res. 2025 Mar;34(3):605-619. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03849-z. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.关于支持电子和纸质患者报告结局(PRO)测量等效性所需证据的建议:国际药物经济学与结果研究协会(ISPOR)电子PRO良好研究实践工作组报告
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
2
Perspectives on patient-reported outcomes : content validity and qualitative research in a changing clinical trial environment.患者报告结局的视角:在不断变化的临床试验环境中的内容效度与定性研究
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(5):363-70. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826050-00002.
3
Patient-reported outcome measures for the assessment of stress in neurological patients: An integrative review.
用于评估神经科患者压力的患者报告结局指标:一项综合综述。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Dec 15;6:100172. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100172. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Recommendations to address respondent burden associated with patient-reported outcome assessment.关于减轻与患者报告结局评估相关的应答负担的建议。
Nat Med. 2024 Mar;30(3):650-659. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02827-9. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
5
Exploring the Impact of Mining on Community Health and Health Service Delivery: Perceptions of Key Informants Involved in Gold Mining Communities in Burkina Faso.探讨采矿对社区健康和卫生服务提供的影响:布基纳法索金矿社区中参与关键信息者的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Dec 12;20(24):7167. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20247167.
6
Sensitivity and specificity of conventional and new face validation in determining the incomprehensible items by older people: Empirical evidence of testing 106 quality-of-life items.传统及新型面部验证在确定老年人难以理解项目方面的敏感性和特异性:对106个生活质量项目进行测试的实证证据
Aging Med (Milton). 2023 May 19;6(3):230-238. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12254. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Age and asymmetry of corticospinal excitability, but not cardiorespiratory fitness, predict cognitive impairments in multiple sclerosis.皮质脊髓兴奋性的年龄和不对称性,而非心肺适能,可预测多发性硬化症患者的认知障碍。
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2023 Jul 29;15:131-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2023.07.002. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Key considerations to reduce or address respondent burden in patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection.减少或解决患者报告结局(PRO)数据收集过程中受访者负担的关键考虑因素。
Nat Commun. 2022 Oct 12;13(1):6026. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33826-4.
9
The Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ) and the Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ): Translation and Cognitive Debriefing of the Arabic Version.《医疗技术评估生产力成本问卷(iPCQ)和医疗消费问卷(iMCQ)》:阿拉伯文版的翻译和认知性审校。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 6;18(14):7232. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147232.
10
A Method for Designing a Patient Burden Questionnaire in Dermatology.一种皮肤科患者负担问卷的设计方法。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2020 Aug 6;13:521-528. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S260323. eCollection 2020.
Testing the Simple Lifestyle Indicator Questionnaire: Initial psychometric study.
测试简单生活方式指标问卷:初步心理测量学研究。
Can Fam Physician. 2008 Jan;54(1):76-7.
4
Patient-reported outcomes: instrument development and selection issues.患者报告的结局:量表开发与选择问题
Value Health. 2007 Nov-Dec;10 Suppl 2:S86-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00271.x.
5
Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance.行业指南:患者报告的结局指标:用于医疗产品开发以支持标签声明:指南草案
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Oct 11;4:79. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-79.
6
A comparison of health utility measures for the evaluation of multiple sclerosis treatments.用于评估多发性硬化症治疗的健康效用测量方法的比较。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;76(1):58-63. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.017897.
7
A qualitative validation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire.《明尼苏达心力衰竭生活问卷》的质性验证
Qual Life Res. 2004 Mar;13(2):417-26. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018487.35591.6e.
8
Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods.预测试调查工具:认知方法概述
Qual Life Res. 2003 May;12(3):229-38. doi: 10.1023/a:1023254226592.
9
Cognitive aspects of survey methodology and quality of life assessment.调查方法学的认知方面与生活质量评估
Qual Life Res. 2003 May;12(3):217-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1023233432721.
10
Listening to respondents: a qualitative assessment of the Short-Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire.倾听受访者心声:对简明健康状况调查问卷(Short-Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire)的定性评估
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Jan;54(1):11-21. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00003-x.