• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估神经科患者压力的患者报告结局指标:一项综合综述。

Patient-reported outcome measures for the assessment of stress in neurological patients: An integrative review.

作者信息

Sairanen Ilkka, Virtanen Heli, Hämäläinen Päivi, Suhonen Riitta

机构信息

University of Turku, Department of Nursing Science, Turku, Finland.

Turku University Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Dec 15;6:100172. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100172. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100172
PMID:38746795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11080350/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient stress is often overlooked in the care of patients with neurological problems. Nursing theorists have previously heralded stress assessment through conceptual clarification, while clinical nurses in the health care system hold an ideal position for implementation of assessment and coordination of support. Integrated with a hospital assessment and support scheme, recognition of stress as a target of systematic assessment can lead to improved clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to describe and compare patient-reported outcome measures suitable for assessment of the stress response as symptoms in neurological patients.

DESIGN

This study is an integrative review and concept development of patient stress based on qualitative and quantitative analysis of available self-reporting instruments.

METHODS

Instruments were retreived with a systematic search from PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO and Web of Science reference databases on August 2, 2021. Search terms associated with the concept of stress symptoms were used. Instrument inclusion was done with the guidance of authoritative symptom inventories, with partial confirmation by a second author to mitigate bias. In the analysis, the instruments included in the review were quantitatively described and compared. Insights from the instrument composition led to clarification of our concept of stress response to further refine the list of instruments suitable for self-assessment of the stress status. This study was not registered.

RESULTS

Based on the inclusion criteria, 23 patient-reported outcome measures extending over a variety of stress concepts were included. The similarity of items among the instruments implied a symptom cluster delineated by 59 common symptom subclasses that were grouped together in a re-classification of instrument items. A comparative quantitative analysis prompted us to distinguish the concept of stress response from antecedent, consequent, and related concepts as a manifestation of mental, somatic, and behavioral domains. Ten instruments with items covering the three domains, each with unique qualities regarding number of items, measured spread, and letter count were described.

CONCLUSIONS

Within an organizational framework, effective allotment among types of support can be founded on the patient's stress status and the stressors. The stress status manifests itself as a set of measurable symptoms. Optimal instruments for use in systematic clinical assessment of neurological patients' stress status should satisfy the suggested specification of the stress response with a minimal number of items and concise wording. Finding and including the relevant instruments for analysis were the main limitation of the study.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Stress of neurological patients needs to be assessed and addressed. We ranked 10 suitable instruments that can be useful in the assessment.

摘要

背景

在神经系统疾病患者的护理中,患者的压力常常被忽视。护理理论家此前通过概念澄清倡导压力评估,而医疗保健系统中的临床护士在实施评估和协调支持方面处于理想位置。将压力识别为系统评估的目标,并与医院评估和支持计划相结合,可改善临床结果。

目的

本研究的目的是描述和比较适合评估神经系统疾病患者压力反应症状的患者报告结局指标。

设计

本研究是基于对现有自我报告工具的定性和定量分析,对患者压力进行的综合综述和概念发展。

方法

2021年8月2日,通过系统检索PubMed、CINAHL、PsychINFO和Web of Science参考数据库获取相关工具。使用了与压力症状概念相关的检索词。在权威症状清单的指导下纳入工具,并由第二作者进行部分确认以减少偏差。在分析中,对纳入综述的工具进行了定量描述和比较。工具构成的见解促使我们澄清压力反应的概念,以进一步完善适合自我评估压力状态的工具列表。本研究未注册。

结果

根据纳入标准,纳入了23项涵盖多种压力概念的患者报告结局指标。工具之间项目的相似性意味着由59个常见症状子类描绘的症状群,这些子类在工具项目的重新分类中被归为一组。比较性定量分析促使我们将压力反应的概念与先行、后续和相关概念区分开来,将其作为心理、躯体和行为领域的一种表现。描述了10项涵盖这三个领域的工具,每项工具在项目数量、测量范围和字母计数方面都有独特之处。

结论

在一个组织框架内,可根据患者的压力状态和压力源在各类支持之间进行有效分配。压力状态表现为一组可测量的症状。用于神经系统疾病患者压力状态系统临床评估的最佳工具应满足压力反应的建议规范,项目数量最少且措辞简洁。寻找并纳入相关工具进行分析是本研究的主要局限。

推文摘要

神经系统疾病患者的压力需要评估和解决。我们对10种适用于评估的工具进行了排名。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/11080350/d479e7d43f0f/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/11080350/5b15ae8ec12f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/11080350/48802f789c34/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/11080350/01ee6ef309f2/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/11080350/9846a42b950d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/11080350/d479e7d43f0f/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/11080350/5b15ae8ec12f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/11080350/48802f789c34/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/11080350/01ee6ef309f2/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/11080350/9846a42b950d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/11080350/d479e7d43f0f/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient-reported outcome measures for the assessment of stress in neurological patients: An integrative review.用于评估神经科患者压力的患者报告结局指标:一项综合综述。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Dec 15;6:100172. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100172. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
4
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.
7
[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].[精神分裂症患者亲属的照顾者负担:测量工具概述]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47.
8
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
9
10
Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.给编辑的信:《ICD-11 与 DSM-5 心境障碍分类的趋同与分歧》
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):293-295. doi: 10.5080/u26899.

引用本文的文献

1
Psycho-Neuroendocrinology in the Rehabilitation Field: Focus on the Complex Interplay between Stress and Pain.康复领域中的心理神经内分泌学:关注压力与疼痛的复杂相互作用。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 7;60(2):285. doi: 10.3390/medicina60020285.

本文引用的文献

1
Stress and neurodegeneration.压力与神经退行性变。
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Apr;503:163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.01.019. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
2
Chronic stress, depression and personality type in patients with myasthenia gravis.重症肌无力患者的慢性应激、抑郁和人格类型。
Eur J Neurol. 2020 Jan;27(1):204-209. doi: 10.1111/ene.14057. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
3
Stress and functional neurological disorders: mechanistic insights.压力与功能性神经障碍疾病:发病机制的新见解。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;90(7):813-821. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318297. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
4
Stress and epilepsy: fact or fiction, and what can we do about it?压力与癫痫:事实还是虚构,我们能做些什么?
Pract Neurol. 2016 Aug;16(4):270-8. doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2015-001337. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
5
Stress: a concept analysis.
Nurs Forum. 2014 Jan-Mar;49(1):71-4. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12044. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
6
Can stress trigger Parkinson's disease?压力会引发帕金森病吗?
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;85(8):878-81. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-305911. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
7
Stress as a risk factor for multiple sclerosis onset or relapse: a systematic review.压力作为多发性硬化症发病或复发的风险因素:系统评价。
Neuroepidemiology. 2011;36(2):109-20. doi: 10.1159/000323953. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
8
Evidence-based practice step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: part I.循证实践步步通:证据的批判性评价:第 1 部分。
Am J Nurs. 2010 Jul;110(7):47-52. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.9c.
9
Applying cognitive debriefing to pre-test patient-reported outcomes in older people with multiple sclerosis.将认知偏差应用于多发性硬化症老年患者的预测试患者报告结局。
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):483-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9602-z. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
10
An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing stress perception.一项针对患者报告结局的评估发现,计算机自适应测试在评估压力感知方面效率很高。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Mar;62(3):278-87, 287.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 Jul 18.