Wagner W H, Treiman R L, Cossman D V, Foran R F, Levin P M, Cohen J L
Division of Vascular Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Ann Vasc Surg. 1991 Mar;5(2):105-10. doi: 10.1007/BF02016740.
In an effort to eliminate the inherent neurologic morbidity associated with arteriographic investigation, we have increasingly relied upon duplex scans of the extracranial carotid arteries prior to endarterectomy. The percentage of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy without arteriograms has increased from 5% in 1984 to 69% during 1988-1989. Initially, carotid endarterectomy without arteriography was limited to patients with hemispheric symptoms and relative contraindications. Over the course of the study from 1984-1989, indications for operation were similar for patients having carotid endarterectomy on the basis of duplex scan alone or following arteriography. The perioperative outcome for these patients undergoing duplex scan (n = 255) and arteriography (n = 484) were similar for stroke (2.4%) versus 2.7%, p = NS) and death (0% versus 0.4%, p = NS). Stratification of groups by indication did not show any significant differences in outcome. Duplex scans were sufficiently accurate to replace preoperative arteriograms in identifying significant stenoses at the carotid bifurcation, including asymptomatic disease. Lack of information regarding intracranial arterial occlusive disease did not adversely affect perioperative outcome. Carotid arteriography can be used selectively when duplex scans are technically difficult, when physical examination or scans suggest either inflow (arch) disease or diffuse, distal internal carotid plaque, or when cerebral symptoms are not sufficiently explained by duplex findings.
为了消除与动脉造影检查相关的内在神经病变,我们在动脉内膜切除术之前越来越依赖于颅外颈动脉的双功扫描。未进行动脉造影而接受颈动脉内膜切除术的患者比例已从1984年的5%增加到1988 - 1989年期间的69%。最初,未进行动脉造影的颈动脉内膜切除术仅限于有半球症状和相对禁忌证的患者。在1984 - 1989年的研究过程中,仅基于双功扫描或动脉造影后接受颈动脉内膜切除术的患者的手术指征相似。接受双功扫描(n = 255)和动脉造影(n = 484)的这些患者的围手术期结局在中风方面相似(2.4%对2.7%,p = 无显著性差异),在死亡方面也相似(0%对0.4%,p = 无显著性差异)。按指征对组进行分层未显示出结局有任何显著差异。双功扫描在识别颈动脉分叉处的显著狭窄(包括无症状疾病)方面足够准确,足以替代术前动脉造影。缺乏关于颅内动脉闭塞性疾病的信息并未对围手术期结局产生不利影响。当双功扫描在技术上困难、体格检查或扫描提示有流入(弓部)疾病或弥漫性、远端颈内动脉斑块,或者当双功扫描结果不足以解释脑部症状时,可以选择性地使用颈动脉造影。