Suppr超能文献

当代环境下的心脏除颤器导线拔除:LExICon 研究:连续激光导线拔除的观察性回顾性研究。

Lead extraction in the contemporary setting: the LExICon study: an observational retrospective study of consecutive laser lead extractions.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 9;55(6):579-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.070.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to examine the safety and efficacy of laser-assisted lead extraction and the indications, outcomes, and risk factors in a large series of consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND

The need for lead extraction has been increasing in direct relationship to the increased numbers of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing transvenous laser-assisted lead extraction at 13 centers were included.

RESULTS

Between January 2004 and December 2007, 1,449 consecutive patients underwent laser-assisted lead extraction of 2,405 leads (20 to 270 procedures/site). Median implantation duration was 82.1 months (0.4 to 356.8 months). Leads were completely removed 96.5% of the time, with a 97.7% clinical success rate whereby clinical goals associated with the indication for lead removal were achieved. Failure to achieve clinical success was associated with body mass index <25 kg/m(2) and low extraction volume centers. Procedural failure was higher in leads implanted for >10 years and when performed in low volume centers. Major adverse events in 20 patients were directly related to the procedure (1.4%) including 4 deaths (0.28%). Major adverse effects were associated with patients with a body mass index <25 kg/m(2). Overall all-cause in-hospital mortality was 1.86%; 4.3% when associated with endocarditis, 7.9% when associated with endocarditis and diabetes, and 12.4% when associated with endocarditis and creatinine > or =2.0. Indicators of all-cause in-hospital mortality were pocket infections, device-related endocarditis, diabetes, and creatinine > or =2.0.

CONCLUSIONS

Lead extraction employing laser sheaths is highly successful with a low procedural complication rate. Total mortality is substantially increased with pocket infections or device-related endocarditis, particularly in the setting of diabetes, renal insufficiency, or body mass index <25 kg/m(2). Centers with smaller case volumes tended to have a lower rate of successful extraction.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨激光辅助导线拔除的安全性和有效性,以及在一系列连续患者中适应证、结局和危险因素。

背景

随着心血管植入式电子设备数量的增加,对导线拔除的需求也在不断增加。

方法

在 13 个中心连续纳入接受经静脉激光辅助导线拔除的患者。

结果

2004 年 1 月至 2007 年 12 月,连续 1449 例患者行 2405 根导线(每个部位 20 至 270 次手术)的激光辅助导线拔除术。植入中位时间为 82.1 个月(0.4 至 356.8 个月)。导线完全拔除率为 96.5%,临床成功率为 97.7%,即与导线拔除适应证相关的临床目标得以实现。临床成功率失败与 BMI<25kg/m(2)和低提取量中心相关。植入时间>10 年和在低容量中心进行时,程序失败率较高。20 例患者的 20 例主要不良事件与该程序直接相关(1.4%),包括 4 例死亡(0.28%)。主要不良事件与 BMI<25kg/m(2)的患者相关。总体全因住院死亡率为 1.86%;与心内膜炎相关者为 4.3%,与心内膜炎和糖尿病相关者为 7.9%,与心内膜炎和肌酐≥2.0 相关者为 12.4%。全因住院死亡率的指标为囊袋感染、器械相关心内膜炎、糖尿病和肌酐≥2.0。

结论

采用激光鞘的导线拔除成功率高,并发症发生率低。全因死亡率显著增加与囊袋感染或器械相关心内膜炎,尤其是在糖尿病、肾功能不全或 BMI<25kg/m(2)的情况下。病例量较小的中心,成功拔除的比例较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验