Leibniz Universität Hannover, Institut für Arbeitsökonomik, Königsworther Platz 1, D-30167 Hannover, Germany.
J Health Econ. 2010 Mar;29(2):285-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
We evaluate the effects of a reduction in sick pay from 100 to 80% of the wage. Unlike previous literature, apart from absence from work, we also consider effects on doctor/hospital visits and subjective health indicators. We also add to the literature by estimating both switch-on and switch-off effects, because the reform was repealed 2 years later. We find a 2-day reduction in the number of days of absence. Quantile regression reveals higher point estimates (both in absolute and relative terms) at higher quantiles, meaning that the reform predominantly reduced long durations of absence. In terms of health, the reform reduced the average number of days spent in hospital by almost half a day, but we cannot find robust evidence for negative effects on health outcomes or perceived liquidity constraints.
我们评估了将病假工资从工资的 100%降低到 80%的影响。与以往的文献不同,除了缺勤之外,我们还考虑了对看医生/去医院就诊次数和主观健康指标的影响。我们还通过估计开关效应来补充文献,因为该改革在两年后被废除。我们发现缺勤天数减少了 2 天。分位数回归显示,在较高分位数上的点估计值更高(无论是绝对值还是相对值),这意味着改革主要减少了较长时间的缺勤。就健康而言,改革使住院天数平均减少了近半天,但我们没有发现对健康结果或感知流动性约束有负面影响的可靠证据。