• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的方法对胸移植进行预后分析。

A machine learning-based approach to prognostic analysis of thoracic transplantations.

机构信息

Oklahoma State University, Tulsa, 74106, USA.

出版信息

Artif Intell Med. 2010 May;49(1):33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2010.01.002. Epub 2010 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.artmed.2010.01.002
PMID:20153956
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The prediction of survival time after organ transplantations and prognosis analysis of different risk groups of transplant patients are not only clinically important but also technically challenging. The current studies, which are mostly linear modeling-based statistical analyses, have focused on small sets of disparate predictive factors where many potentially important variables are neglected in their analyses. Data mining methods, such as machine learning-based approaches, are capable of providing an effective way of overcoming these limitations by utilizing sufficiently large data sets with many predictive factors to identify not only linear associations but also highly complex, non-linear relationships. Therefore, this study is aimed at exploring risk groups of thoracic recipients through machine learning-based methods.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

A large, feature-rich, nation-wide thoracic transplantation dataset (obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing-UNOS) is used to develop predictive models for the survival time estimation. The predictive factors that are most relevant to the survival time identified via, (1) conducting sensitivity analysis on models developed by the machine learning methods, (2) extraction of variables from the published literature, and (3) eliciting variables from the medical experts and other domain specific knowledge bases. A unified set of predictors is then used to develop a Cox regression model and the related prognosis indices. A comparison of clustering algorithm-based and conventional risk grouping techniques is conducted based on the outcome of the Cox regression model in order to identify optimal number of risk groups of thoracic recipients. Finally, the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis is performed to validate the discrimination among the identified various risk groups.

RESULTS

The machine learning models performed very effectively in predicting the survival time: the support vector machine model with a radial basis Kernel function produced the best fit with an R(2) value of 0.879, the artificial neural network (multilayer perceptron-MLP-model) came the second with an R(2) value of 0.847, and the M5 algorithm-based regression tree model came last with an R(2) value of 0.785. Following the proposed method, a consolidated set of predictive variables are determined and used to build the Cox survival model. Using the prognosis indices revealed by the Cox survival model along with a k-means clustering algorithm, an optimal number of "three" risk groups is identified. The significance of differences among these risk groups are also validated using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the integrated machine learning method to select the predictor variables is more effective in developing the Cox survival models than the traditional methods commonly found in the literature. The significant distinction among the risk groups of thoracic patients also validates the effectiveness of the methodology proposed herein. We anticipate that this study (and other AI based analytic studies like this one) will lead to more effective analyses of thoracic transplant procedures to better understand the prognosis of thoracic organ recipients. It would potentially lead to new medical and biological advances and more effective allocation policies in the field of organ transplantation.

摘要

目的

器官移植后生存时间的预测和不同移植风险组的预后分析不仅具有临床重要性,而且具有技术挑战性。目前的研究主要基于线性建模的统计分析,侧重于小的、不同的预测因素集,在分析中忽略了许多潜在的重要变量。数据挖掘方法(如基于机器学习的方法)能够提供一种有效的方法,通过利用具有许多预测因素的足够大数据集,不仅可以识别线性关联,还可以识别高度复杂的非线性关系,从而克服这些限制。因此,本研究旨在通过基于机器学习的方法探索胸接受者的风险组。

方法和材料

使用大型、特征丰富的全国性胸移植数据集(从联合器官共享网络-UNOS 获得),通过机器学习方法开发预测模型,用于估计生存时间。通过(1)对机器学习方法开发的模型进行敏感性分析,(2)从已发表的文献中提取变量,以及(3)从医学专家和其他领域特定知识库中提取变量,确定与生存时间最相关的预测因素。然后使用统一的预测因子集开发 Cox 回归模型和相关的预后指标。基于 Cox 回归模型的结果,对聚类算法和传统风险分组技术进行比较,以确定胸接受者的最佳风险组数量。最后,进行 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析,以验证所确定的各种风险组之间的区分度。

结果

机器学习模型在预测生存时间方面表现非常有效:具有径向基核函数的支持向量机模型拟合度最好,R(2)值为 0.879,人工神经网络(多层感知器-MLP 模型)次之,R(2)值为 0.847,基于 M5 算法的回归树模型最差,R(2)值为 0.785。按照提出的方法,确定了一组综合预测变量,并用于构建 Cox 生存模型。使用 Cox 生存模型揭示的预后指标和 k-means 聚类算法,确定了“三个”最佳风险组数量。还使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析验证了这些风险组之间差异的显著性。

结论

本研究表明,与文献中常见的传统方法相比,集成机器学习方法选择预测变量更有效地开发 Cox 生存模型。胸患者风险组之间的显著差异也验证了本文提出的方法的有效性。我们预计,这项研究(和其他类似的基于人工智能的分析研究)将导致对胸移植手术的更有效的分析,从而更好地理解胸器官接受者的预后。它有可能带来新的医学和生物学进展,并在器官移植领域制定更有效的分配政策。

相似文献

1
A machine learning-based approach to prognostic analysis of thoracic transplantations.基于机器学习的方法对胸移植进行预后分析。
Artif Intell Med. 2010 May;49(1):33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2010.01.002. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
2
Predicting the graft survival for heart-lung transplantation patients: an integrated data mining methodology.预测心肺移植患者的移植物存活率:一种综合数据挖掘方法。
Int J Med Inform. 2009 Dec;78(12):e84-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
3
Mixture classification model based on clinical markers for breast cancer prognosis.基于临床标志物的乳腺癌预后混合分类模型。
Artif Intell Med. 2010 Feb-Mar;48(2-3):129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2009.07.008. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
4
Predicting three-year kidney graft survival in recipients with systemic lupus erythematosus.预测系统性红斑狼疮患者肾移植 3 年的存活率。
ASAIO J. 2011 Jul-Aug;57(4):300-9. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e318222db30.
5
Survival of primary and repeat lung transplantation in the United States.美国初次及再次肺移植的生存率
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jan;87(1):261-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.10.031.
6
Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.美国癌症协会关于空气污染颗粒与死亡率关系研究的长期随访及空间分析
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009 May(140):5-114; discussion 115-36.
7
Penalized Cox regression analysis in the high-dimensional and low-sample size settings, with applications to microarray gene expression data.高维小样本情况下的惩罚Cox回归分析及其在微阵列基因表达数据中的应用
Bioinformatics. 2005 Jul 1;21(13):3001-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti422. Epub 2005 Apr 6.
8
Impact of donor-to-recipient weight ratio on survival after heart transplantation: analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database.供体与受体体重比在心脏移植术后生存中的影响:器官共享联合网络数据库分析
Circulation. 2008 Sep 30;118(14 Suppl):S83-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.756866.
9
Prognostic variables and prognostic groups for malignant melanoma. The information from Cox and Classification And Regression Trees analysis: an Italian population-based study.恶性黑色素瘤的预后变量和预后分组。来自Cox模型及分类与回归树分析的信息:一项基于意大利人群的研究。
Melanoma Res. 2006 Oct;16(5):429-33. doi: 10.1097/01.cmr.0000222602.80803.e1.
10
Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods.预测乳腺癌的生存能力:三种数据挖掘方法的比较
Artif Intell Med. 2005 Jun;34(2):113-27. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2004.07.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of artificial intelligence and machine learning in lung transplantation: a comprehensive review.人工智能和机器学习在肺移植中的应用:综述
Front Digit Health. 2025 May 1;7:1583490. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1583490. eCollection 2025.
2
Machine learning in solid organ transplantation: Charting the evolving landscape.实体器官移植中的机器学习:描绘不断演变的图景。
World J Transplant. 2025 Mar 18;15(1):99642. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i1.99642.
3
Deep Learning-Based Prediction Modeling of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Liver Transplantation.
基于深度学习的肝移植后主要不良心血管事件预测模型
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024 Jun;2(2):221-230. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.03.005. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
4
Machine learning using institution-specific multi-modal electronic health records improves mortality risk prediction for cardiac surgery patients.利用机构特定的多模态电子健康记录进行机器学习,可改善心脏手术患者的死亡风险预测。
JTCVS Open. 2023 Apr 5;14:214-251. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.03.010. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Fairly Predicting Graft Failure in Liver Transplant for Organ Assigning.为器官分配而进行肝移植中较为准确地预测移植物失功。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023 Apr 29;2022:415-424. eCollection 2022.
6
Machine learning predictive modelling for identification of predictors of acute respiratory infection and diarrhoea in Uganda's rural and urban settings.用于识别乌干达农村和城市地区急性呼吸道感染和腹泻预测因素的机器学习预测模型。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 May 11;2(5):e0000430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000430. eCollection 2022.
7
Artificial intelligence guidance of advanced heart failure therapies: A systematic scoping review.晚期心力衰竭治疗的人工智能指导:一项系统综述。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Feb 24;10:1127716. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1127716. eCollection 2023.
8
Machine learning-based techniques to improve lung transplantation outcomes and complications: a systematic review.基于机器学习的技术改善肺移植结局和并发症:系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Dec 23;22(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01823-2.
9
Linking clinotypes to phenotypes and genotypes from laboratory test results in comprehensive physical exams.将临床表型与实验室检测结果中的基因型联系起来,进行全面的体格检查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Feb 24;21(Suppl 3):51. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01387-z.
10
Development of a Machine-Learning Model of Short-Term Prognostic Prediction for Spinal Stenosis Surgery in Korean Patients.韩国患者腰椎管狭窄症手术短期预后预测的机器学习模型开发
Brain Sci. 2020 Oct 22;10(11):764. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10110764.