Suppr超能文献

吸烟者唾液污染牙本质的粘结强度。

Bond strength of adhesives to dentin contaminated with smoker's saliva.

机构信息

Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, University of California, 707 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143-0758, USA.

出版信息

Odontology. 2010 Feb;98(1):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s10266-009-0109-4. Epub 2010 Feb 16.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of contamination with smoker's and non-smoker's saliva on the bond strength of resin composite to superficial dentin using different adhesive systems. The interfacial structure between the resin and dentin was evaluated for each treatment using environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM). Freshly extracted human molars were ground with 600-grit SiC paper to expose the superficial dentin. Adhesives [One-Up-Bond-F-Plus (OUFP) and Adper-Prompt-L-Pop (APLP)] and resin composite (TPHSpectrum) were bonded to the dentin (n = 8/group, 180 total specimens) under five surface conditions: control (adhesive applied following manufacturers' instructions); saliva, then 5-s air dry, then adhesive; adhesive, saliva, 5-s air dry; adhesive, saliva, 5-s water rinse, 5-s air dry (ASW group); and adhesive, saliva, 5-s water rinse, 5-s air dry, reapply adhesive (ASWA group). After storage in water at 37 degrees C for 24 h, the specimens were debonded under tension at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. ESEM photomicrographs of the dentin/adhesive interfaces were taken. Mean bond strength ranged from 8.1 to 24.1 MPa. Fisher's protected least significant difference (P = 0.05) intervals for critical adhesive, saliva, and surface condition differences were 1.3, 1.3, and 2.1 MPa, respectively. There were no significant differences in bond strength to dentin between contamination by smoker's and nonsmoker's saliva, but bond strengths were significantly different between adhesive systems, with OUFP twice as strong as APLP under almost all conditions. After adhesive application and contamination with either smoker's or nonsmoker's saliva followed by washing and reapplication of the adhesive (ASWA group), the bond strength of both adhesive systems was the same as that of the control group.

摘要

本研究旨在确定吸烟者和非吸烟者唾液污染对使用不同粘接系统的树脂复合材料与表面牙本质粘结强度的影响。使用环境扫描电子显微镜(ESEM)评估每种处理方法中树脂和牙本质之间的界面结构。使用 600 目 SiC 砂纸将新鲜提取的人磨牙磨至暴露表面牙本质。将粘接剂[One-Up-Bond-F-Plus (OUFP) 和 Adper-Prompt-L-Pop (APLP)]和树脂复合材料(TPHSpectrum)应用于牙本质(n = 8/组,共 180 个标本),共五种表面条件:对照(按制造商说明应用粘接剂);唾液,然后空气干燥 5 秒,然后应用粘接剂;粘接剂,唾液,空气干燥 5 秒;粘接剂,唾液,5 秒水冲洗,空气干燥 5 秒(ASW 组);粘接剂,唾液,5 秒水冲洗,空气干燥 5 秒,重新应用粘接剂(ASWA 组)。在 37°C 水中储存 24 小时后,以 0.5mm/min 的速度进行拉伸离断试件。拍摄牙本质/粘接剂界面的 ESEM 照片。平均粘结强度范围为 8.1 至 24.1MPa。关键粘接剂、唾液和表面条件差异的 Fisher 保护最小显著差异(P = 0.05)间隔分别为 1.3、1.3 和 2.1MPa。污染来自吸烟者和非吸烟者唾液的粘结强度在牙本质之间没有显著差异,但粘结强度在粘接系统之间有显著差异,OUFP 在几乎所有条件下的粘结强度均是 APLP 的两倍。在应用粘接剂后,用吸烟者或非吸烟者的唾液污染,然后用清水冲洗并重新应用粘接剂(ASWA 组),两种粘接系统的粘结强度与对照组相同。

相似文献

1
Bond strength of adhesives to dentin contaminated with smoker's saliva.
Odontology. 2010 Feb;98(1):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s10266-009-0109-4. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
3
"No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives--a microtensile bond strength and morphological study.
Dent Mater. 2001 Sep;17(5):373-80. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00084-1.
4
Bond strength of newer dentin bonding agents in different clinical situations.
Oper Dent. 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2):169-76. doi: 10.2341/10-55-L.
6
Effect of mucoprotein on the bond strength of resin composite to human dentin.
Odontology. 2011 Jul;99(2):119-28. doi: 10.1007/s10266-011-0002-9. Epub 2011 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Recent advances in the theory and mechanism of adhesive resin bonding to dentin: a critical review.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Feb;88(2):558-78. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31253.
8
Physicochemical interactions at the dentin/adhesive interface using FTIR chemical imaging.
J Biomed Opt. 2005 May-Jun;10(3):031104. doi: 10.1117/1.1914844.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验