Pavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Science, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Eur J Med Res. 2009 Dec 7;14 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):63-6. doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-14-s4-63.
Effect of posture on the hypercapnic ventilatory response was studied on the anaesthetized rats by using rebreathing techniques in the supine and head-down positions. There were no statistically significant alterations in tidal volume, frequency, minute ventilation, and P(ET)CO(2)between the head-down and supine positions during breathing at rest. However, the esophageal pressure inspiratory swings were significantly greater in the head-down compared with supine position. Moreover, we found that body position did not affect the hypercapnic ventilatory response, but did affect the relationship between inspiratory driving pressure and the increase of end tidal PCO(2). Greater inspiratory pressure is required to maintain the same level of the ventilatory response to hypercapnia in the horizontal position with the head-down. We believe that the discrepancy between postural alterations in the hypercapnic ventilatory and pressure responses is presumably a result of decreased lung compliance and increased airflow impedance of respiratory system in the head-down position.
采用重复呼吸技术,在仰卧位和头低位麻醉大鼠上研究体位对高碳酸血症通气反应的影响。在休息时呼吸时,头低位与仰卧位之间的潮气量、频率、分钟通气量和 P(ET)CO2 没有统计学上的显著改变。然而,与仰卧位相比,食管压力吸气摆动在头低位显著更大。此外,我们发现体位并不影响高碳酸血症通气反应,但确实影响吸气驱动压与呼气末 PCO2 增加之间的关系。在头低位的水平位置,需要更大的吸气压力来维持相同水平的高碳酸血症通气反应。我们认为,高碳酸血症通气和压力反应的体位改变之间的差异可能是由于头低位时肺顺应性降低和呼吸系统气流阻力增加所致。