Prevention Research Center in St Louis, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St Louis, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8109, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Health Educ Res. 2010 Apr;25(2):185-98. doi: 10.1093/her/cyq003. Epub 2010 Feb 15.
Given sparse knowledge on dissemination, this study sought to explore key benefits, barriers and contextual factors that are perceived to be important to the adoption and implementation of the 'Community Guide's' evidence-based physical activity recommendations.
We conducted case studies in two states where extensive adoption and implementation of the Guide's recommendations have occurred and in two states where widespread dissemination has lagged. Interviews (n = 76) were semi-structured and included both quantitative and qualitative methods. Participant perceptions from the following areas were examined: (i) priority of physical activity, (ii) awareness of and ability to define the term 'evidence-based approaches' and (iii) awareness, adoption, facilitators, benefits, challenges and barriers to Guide adoption.
Key enabling factors among high capacity states included: funds and direction from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; leadership support; capable staff; and successful partnerships and collaborations. Restraining forces among low capacity states included: the Guide recommendations being too new; participants being too new to current job; lack of time and training on how to use the Guide recommendations; limited funds and other resources and lack of leadership.
To be effective, we must gain an understanding of contextual factors when designing for dissemination.
鉴于对传播的了解甚少,本研究旨在探讨被认为对采用和实施“社区指南”循证体育活动建议重要的主要益处、障碍和背景因素。
我们在两个广泛采用和实施指南建议的州以及两个广泛传播滞后的州进行了案例研究。访谈(n=76)采用半结构化方式,包括定量和定性方法。从以下几个方面考察了参与者的看法:(i)体育活动的优先级,(ii)对“循证方法”一词的认识和定义能力,以及(iii)对指南采用的认识、采用、促进因素、益处、挑战和障碍。
高能力州的主要促进因素包括:疾病控制和预防中心的资金和指导;领导力支持;有能力的员工;以及成功的伙伴关系和合作。低能力州的制约因素包括:指南建议过于新颖;参与者对当前工作太新;缺乏如何使用指南建议的时间和培训;有限的资金和其他资源以及缺乏领导力。
为了有效,我们在设计传播时必须了解背景因素。