Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Jan 22;7:4. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-4.
Clinic-based behavioral weight loss programs are effective in producing significant weight loss. A one-size-fits-all approach is often taken with these programs. It may be beneficial to tailor programs based on participants' baseline characteristics. Type and level of motivation may be an important factor to consider. Previous research has found that, in general, higher levels of controlled motivation are detrimental to behavior change while higher levels of autonomous motivation improve the likelihood of behavior modification.
This study assessed the outcomes of two internet behavioral weight loss interventions and assessed the effect of baseline motivation levels on program success. Eighty females (M (SD) age 48.7 (10.6) years; BMI 32.0 (3.7) kg/m(2); 91% Caucasian) were randomized to one of two groups, a standard group or a motivation-enhanced group. Both received a 16-week internet behavioral weight loss program and attended an initial and a four-week group session. Weight and motivation were measured at baseline, four and 16 weeks. Hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to test for moderation.
There was significant weight loss at 16-weeks in both groups (p < 0.001); however there were no between group differences (p = 0.57) (standard group 3.4 (3.6) kg; motivation-enhanced group 3.9 (3.4) kg). Further analysis was conducted to examine predictors of weight loss. Baseline controlled motivation level was negatively correlated with weight loss in the entire sample (r = -0.30; p = 0.01). Statistical analysis revealed an interaction between study group assignment and baseline level of controlled motivation. Weight loss was not predicted by baseline level of controlled motivation in the motivation-enhanced group, but was significantly predicted by controlled motivation in the standard group. Baseline autonomous motivation did not predict weight change in either group.
This research found that, in participants with high levels of baseline controlled motivation for weight loss, an intervention designed to enhance motivation for weight loss produced significantly greater weight loss than a standard behavioral weight loss intervention.
基于诊所的行为减肥计划在产生显著减肥效果方面非常有效。这些计划通常采用一刀切的方法。根据参与者的基线特征定制计划可能会有所帮助。类型和水平的动机可能是一个需要考虑的重要因素。先前的研究发现,一般来说,较高水平的受控动机不利于行为改变,而较高水平的自主动机提高了行为修正的可能性。
本研究评估了两种基于互联网的行为减肥干预措施的结果,并评估了基线动机水平对计划成功的影响。80 名女性(M(SD)年龄 48.7(10.6)岁;BMI 32.0(3.7)kg/m2;91%白种人)被随机分配到两组之一,标准组或动机增强组。两组均接受 16 周的互联网行为减肥计划,并参加了一次初始和四次小组会议。体重和动机在基线、四周和十六周时进行测量。进行层次回归分析以检验调节作用。
两组在 16 周时均有显著的体重减轻(p < 0.001);但两组之间没有差异(p = 0.57)(标准组 3.4(3.6)kg;动机增强组 3.9(3.4)kg)。进一步分析以检验体重减轻的预测因素。整个样本中,基线受控动机水平与体重减轻呈负相关(r = -0.30;p = 0.01)。统计分析显示,研究组分配和基线受控动机水平之间存在交互作用。在动机增强组中,基线受控动机水平不能预测体重减轻,但在标准组中,基线受控动机水平显著预测体重减轻。两组中基线自主动机均不能预测体重变化。
这项研究发现,在基线减重受控动机水平较高的参与者中,旨在增强减重动机的干预措施比标准行为减重干预措施产生的减重效果显著更大。