Al Zhranei Raid M, Ismail Mohammad, Allah Mohammed, Alzahrani Mousa
Respiratory Therapy Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, SAU.
Research Office, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, SAU.
Cureus. 2021 Oct 12;13(10):e18714. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18714. eCollection 2021 Oct.
Introduction Vital Capacity (VC) is measured by spirometry. VC can differ according to weight, age, gender, race and height of the investigated person. Repetition of the same tasks has been proven to enhance adults' performance. Encouraging on some tasks have shown to result in a significant difference. Aim This study aimed to examine if verbal encouragement and repetition of spirometry would make a difference in the results. Method This is a randomized clinical trial involving 136 healthy volunteers, randomly allocated to one of two groups: control and intervention groups. In both groups, VC was assessed as the baseline (VC1). VC was assessed again after ten days maximally (VC2). The third time of measuring VC was assessed again after ten days maximally (VC3). The verbal encouragement was provided only to the intervention group during iVC2 and iVC3, and only repeating was required from the control group in cVC2 and cVC3. Results and Conclusion There was no significant difference in VC after the third trial in the control group compared to the baseline measurement (p-value= 0.836). On the other hand, verbal encouragement in the third trial had a significant difference in VC compared to the baseline measurement (p-value= 0.000).
引言
肺活量(VC)通过肺活量测定法测量。肺活量会因被调查者的体重、年龄、性别、种族和身高而有所不同。已证明重复相同任务可提高成年人的表现。在某些任务上给予鼓励已显示会产生显著差异。
目的
本研究旨在检验肺活量测定的言语鼓励和重复操作是否会使结果产生差异。
方法
这是一项随机临床试验,涉及136名健康志愿者,随机分为两组:对照组和干预组。在两组中,肺活量均作为基线(VC1)进行评估。十天后最大程度地再次评估肺活量(VC2)。十天后最大程度地再次进行第三次肺活量测量(VC3)。在iVC2和iVC3期间仅对干预组给予言语鼓励,而在cVC2和cVC3中对照组仅需重复操作。
结果与结论
与基线测量相比,对照组在第三次试验后的肺活量无显著差异(p值 = 0.836)。另一方面,第三次试验中的言语鼓励与基线测量相比,肺活量有显著差异(p值 = 0.000)。