• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种正畸粘结剂的体外粘结强度评价。

In vitro bond strength evaluation of four orthodontic cements.

机构信息

IRCCS-Ospedale Policlinico S.Matteo,Department of Orthodontics, Piazzale Golgi 2, 27100 Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

J Adhes Dent. 2010 Apr;12(2):131-5. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a17544.

DOI:10.3290/j.jad.a17544
PMID:20157669
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of orthodontic molar bands cemented with four different adhesives.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty extracted human third molars were embedded in resin blocks and randomly assigned to one of four groups. Four different band cements were investigated: Ormco OptiBand, Dentaurum GlasTec, GC Fuji Ortho Band Paste Pak, and Unitek Multi-Cure Glass lonomer Orthodontic Band Cement. Bands were cemented on the molar crowns, and tensile loads were applied to measure the retentive strength. One-way ANOVA was performed for the retentive strength, and the Scheff multiple comparison test was applied as a post-hoc test. The Fisher exact test was used to determine significant differences in the ARI scores.

RESULTS

The mean tensile bond strength of GC Fuji Ortho Paste Pak was significantly higher than those of all the other groups tested. No statistically significant differences were found among the other three groups.

CONCLUSION

Among the adhesives investigated in the present study, Fuji Ortho Paste Pak resin-modified glass-ionomer cement provided the highest tensile bond strength values.

摘要

目的

确定用四种不同黏合剂黏固正畸磨牙带的抗剪黏结强度和黏附残留指数。

材料与方法

将 80 颗人离体第三磨牙嵌入树脂块中,然后随机分为四组。研究了四种不同的带黏合剂:Ormco OptiBand、Dentaurum GlasTec、GC Fuji Ortho Band Paste Pak 和 Unitek Multi-Cure Glass lonomer Orthodontic Band Cement。将带黏固在磨牙冠上,然后施加拉伸载荷以测量保持力。对保持力进行单因素方差分析,并应用 Scheff 多重比较检验作为事后检验。Fisher 确切概率检验用于确定 ARI 评分的显著差异。

结果

GC Fuji Ortho Paste Pak 的平均拉伸黏结强度明显高于其他所有测试组。其他三组之间没有统计学显著差异。

结论

在所研究的黏合剂中,Fuji Ortho Paste Pak 树脂改性玻璃离子黏固剂提供了最高的拉伸黏结强度值。

相似文献

1
In vitro bond strength evaluation of four orthodontic cements.四种正畸粘结剂的体外粘结强度评价。
J Adhes Dent. 2010 Apr;12(2):131-5. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a17544.
2
In-vitro fluoride release rates from 9 orthodontic bonding adhesives.9种正畸粘结剂的体外氟释放率
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Nov;132(5):656-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.037.
3
In-vitro study of resin-modified glass ionomer cements for cementation of orthodontic bands. Isolation, surplus removal and humidity as factors influencing the bond strength between enamel, cement and metal.用于正畸带环粘结的树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的体外研究。隔离、多余材料去除及湿度作为影响釉质、水门汀与金属之间粘结强度的因素。
J Orofac Orthop. 1999;60(5):348-60. doi: 10.1007/BF01301247.
4
Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.两种传统树脂黏合剂与一种树脂增强型玻璃离子水门汀之间托槽脱黏力的比较:一项体外和体内研究。
Angle Orthod. 1999 Oct;69(5):463-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0463:COBDFB>2.3.CO;2.
5
Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study.传统树脂黏合剂与树脂改性玻璃离子黏合剂之间黏结强度的比较:一项体外和体内研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Aug;126(2):200-6; quiz 254-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.06.013.
6
In vitro comparison of orthodontic band cements.正畸带环黏结剂的体外比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jan;123(1):15-20. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.48.
7
Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.用于带环粘结的树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀、改良型复合树脂或传统玻璃离子水门汀?——一项体外评估
Eur J Orthod. 2003 Dec;25(6):609-14. doi: 10.1093/ejo/25.6.609.
8
Bonded molar tubes--an in vitro evaluation.粘结磨牙管——一项体外评估
Angle Orthod. 2001 Oct;71(5):380-5. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071<0380:BMTAIV>2.0.CO;2.
9
Retention of orthodontic bands with three different cements.使用三种不同黏固剂对正畸带环的固位情况
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1995 Winter;19(2):127-30.
10
Retention of orthodontic bands with new fluoride-releasing cements.使用新型含氟粘结剂固定正畸带环
Am J Orthod. 1986 Mar;89(3):206-11. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(86)90033-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of no-primer adhesives and anchor pylons bracket bases on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.无酸蚀底涂剂和托槽基底对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:315023. doi: 10.1155/2013/315023. Epub 2013 Aug 4.