• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项静脉注射孟鲁司特治疗急性哮喘的随机安慰剂对照研究。

A randomized placebo-controlled study of intravenous montelukast for the treatment of acute asthma.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Feb;125(2):374-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.11.015.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2009.11.015
PMID:20159247
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current treatments for acute asthma provide inadequate benefit for some patients. Intravenous montelukast may complement existent therapies.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efficacy of intravenous montelukast as adjunctive therapy for acute asthma.

METHODS

A total of 583 adults with acute asthma were treated with standard care during a < or = 60-minute screening period. Patients with FEV(1) < or =50% predicted were randomly allocated to intravenous montelukast 7 mg (n = 291) or placebo (n = 292) in addition to standard care. This double-blind treatment period lasted until a decision for discharge, hospital admission, or discontinuation from the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was the time-weighted average change in FEV(1) during 60 minutes after drug administration. Secondary endpoints included the time-weighted average change in FEV(1) at various intervals (10-120 minutes) and percentage of patients with treatment failure (defined as hospitalization or lack of decision to discharge by 3 hours postadministration).

RESULTS

Montelukast significantly increased FEV(1) at 60 minutes postdose; the difference between change from baseline for placebo (least-squares mean of 0.22 L; 95% CI, 0.17, 0.27) and montelukast (0.32 L; 95% CI, 0.27, 0.37) was 0.10 L (95% CI, 0.04, 0.16). Similar improvements in FEV(1)-related variables were seen at all time points (all P <.05). Although treatment failure did not differ between groups (OR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.63, 1.34), a prespecified subgroup analysis suggests likely benefit for intravenous montelukast at US sites.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous montelukast added to standard care in adults with acute asthma produced significant relief of airway obstruction throughout the 2 hours after administration, with an onset of action as early as 10 minutes.

摘要

背景

目前的急性哮喘治疗方法对某些患者效果不佳。静脉用孟鲁司特可能会补充现有的治疗方法。

目的

评估静脉用孟鲁司特作为急性哮喘辅助治疗的疗效。

方法

共有 583 名急性哮喘成人患者在 < 或 = 60 分钟的筛选期内接受标准治疗。FEV(1) < 或 = 50%预测值的患者被随机分配至静脉用孟鲁司特 7 mg(n = 291)或安慰剂(n = 292),并接受标准治疗。双盲治疗期持续至出院、住院或退出研究决定。主要疗效终点是给药后 60 分钟时的时间加权平均 FEV(1)变化。次要终点包括不同时间(10-120 分钟)的时间加权平均 FEV(1)变化和治疗失败患者的百分比(定义为给药后 3 小时内住院或未决定出院)。

结果

孟鲁司特治疗组在给药后 60 分钟时显著增加了 FEV(1);与安慰剂(从基线的最小二乘均值为 0.22 L;95%CI,0.17,0.27)相比,孟鲁司特组(0.32 L;95%CI,0.27,0.37)的差异为 0.10 L(95%CI,0.04,0.16)。所有时间点的 FEV(1)相关变量均有类似的改善(均 P <.05)。尽管两组之间的治疗失败率没有差异(OR 0.92;95%CI,0.63,1.34),但一项预先指定的亚组分析表明,美国研究地点的静脉用孟鲁司特可能会带来益处。

结论

在急性哮喘成人患者中,静脉用孟鲁司特联合标准治疗可显著缓解气道阻塞,在给药后 2 小时内持续起效,作用起始时间早至 10 分钟。

相似文献

1
A randomized placebo-controlled study of intravenous montelukast for the treatment of acute asthma.一项静脉注射孟鲁司特治疗急性哮喘的随机安慰剂对照研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Feb;125(2):374-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.11.015.
2
The efficacy of montelukast during the allergy season in pediatric patients with persistent asthma and seasonal aeroallergen sensitivity.孟鲁司特在过敏季节对患有持续性哮喘和季节性气传过敏原敏感的儿科患者的疗效。
J Asthma. 2009 May;46(4):413-20. doi: 10.1080/02770900902847727.
3
A randomized study comparing the effect of loratadine added to montelukast with montelukast, loratadine, and beclomethasone monotherapies in patients with chronic asthma.一项随机研究,比较在慢性哮喘患者中,孟鲁司特联合氯雷他定与孟鲁司特、氯雷他定及倍氯米松单药治疗的效果。
J Asthma. 2009 Jun;46(5):465-9. doi: 10.1080/02770900902846323.
4
Pilot study of oral montelukast added to standard therapy for acute asthma exacerbations in children aged 6 to 14 years.孟鲁司特口服制剂辅助6至14岁儿童急性哮喘加重期标准治疗的初步研究。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Jan;24(1):21-7. doi: 10.1097/pec.0b013e31815f3968.
5
Effect of addition of single dose of oral montelukast to standard treatment in acute moderate to severe asthma in children between 5 and 15 years of age: a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled trial.在 5 至 15 岁儿童急性中重度哮喘患者中,标准治疗基础上加用单剂量口服孟鲁司特钠的效果:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Arch Dis Child. 2010 Jul;95(7):540-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.168567. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
6
Efficacy and tolerability of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus montelukast in childhood asthma: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study.沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松与孟鲁司特治疗儿童哮喘的疗效和耐受性:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、双模拟、平行组研究。
Clin Ther. 2008 Aug;30(8):1492-504. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.07.018.
7
The efficacy and tolerability of intravenous montelukast in acute asthma exacerbations in Japanese patients.静脉注射孟鲁司特对日本患者急性哮喘加重的疗效和耐受性。
J Asthma. 2012 Aug;49(6):649-56. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2012.690479. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
8
Comparison of the effects of intravenous and oral montelukast on airway function: a double blind, placebo controlled, three period, crossover study in asthmatic patients.静脉注射与口服孟鲁司特对气道功能影响的比较:一项针对哮喘患者的双盲、安慰剂对照、三阶段交叉研究。
Thorax. 2000 Apr;55(4):260-5. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.4.260.
9
Montelukast or salmeterol combined with an inhaled steroid in adult asthma: design and rationale of a randomized, double-blind comparative study (the IMPACT Investigation of Montelukast as a Partner Agent for Complementary Therapy-trial).孟鲁司特或沙美特罗联合吸入性糖皮质激素治疗成人哮喘:一项随机、双盲对照研究的设计与原理(孟鲁司特作为辅助治疗药物的IMPACT研究)
Respir Med. 2000 Jun;94(6):612-21. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2000.0806.
10
Analysis of montelukast in mild persistent asthmatic patients with near-normal lung function.孟鲁司特对肺功能接近正常的轻度持续性哮喘患者的分析。
Respir Med. 2001 May;95(5):379-86. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1052.

引用本文的文献

1
A Contemporary Approach to the Treatment of Perioperative Bronchospasm.围手术期支气管痉挛治疗的现代方法
Transl Perioper Pain Med. 2020;7(2):190-198. doi: 10.31480/2330-4871/112. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
2
Effects of oral montelukast on pulmonary function and clinical symptoms in acute asthma exacerbations: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.口服孟鲁司特对急性哮喘加重期肺功能和临床症状的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Aug 30;86(10):5837-5843. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002507. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Practice Patterns for Acute Asthma Exacerbation in Adult Patients Admitted to U.S. Intensive Care Units.
美国重症监护病房收治的成年急性哮喘加重患者的治疗模式
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Oct;21(10):1441-1448. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202401-085OC.
4
Epidemiology and Immunopathogenesis of Virus Associated Asthma Exacerbations.病毒相关性哮喘加重的流行病学与免疫发病机制
J Asthma Allergy. 2023 Sep 26;16:1025-1040. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S277455. eCollection 2023.
5
Pilot Study of Peak Plasma Concentration After High-Dose Oral Montelukast in Children With Acute Asthma Exacerbations.急性哮喘加重患儿高剂量口服孟鲁司特后血浆峰浓度的初步研究。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Mar;61(3):360-367. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1738. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
6
lncRNA PCGEM1 strengthens anti-inflammatory and lung protective effects of montelukast sodium in children with cough-variant asthma.lncRNA PCGEM1 增强孟鲁司特钠对咳嗽变异性哮喘患儿的抗炎和肺保护作用。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2020 Jun 5;53(7):e9271. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20209271. eCollection 2020.
7
Comparison of oral montelukast with oral ozagrel in acute asthma: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.口服孟鲁司特与口服奥扎格雷治疗急性哮喘的比较:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Lung India. 2018 Jan-Feb;35(1):16-20. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_226_17.
8
Oxidative stress and cellular pathways of asthma and inflammation: Therapeutic strategies and pharmacological targets.氧化应激与哮喘和炎症的细胞通路:治疗策略和药理靶点。
Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jan;181:169-182. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.08.011. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
9
Role of Leukotrienes and Leukotriene Modifiers in Asthma.白三烯及白三烯调节剂在哮喘中的作用
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2010 Jun 2;3(6):1792-1811. doi: 10.3390/ph3061792.
10
Comparison of oral montelukast with oral zileuton in acute asthma: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.口服孟鲁司特与口服齐留通治疗急性哮喘的比较:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Lung India. 2016 May-Jun;33(3):281-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.180805.