Department of Kinesiology, School of Health, Kinesiology, and Sport Studies, Coastal Carolina University, PO Box 261954, Conway, SC 29528, USA.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Mar;85(3):239-46. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0509. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
To examine the association between abnormal exercise electrocardiographic (E-ECG) test results and mortality (all-cause and that resulting from coronary heart disease [CHD] or cardiovascular disease [CVD]) in a large population of asymptomatic men with metabolic syndrome (MetS).
A total of 9191 men (mean age, 46.9 years) met the criteria of having MetS. All completed a maximal E-ECG treadmill test (May 14, 1979, through April 9, 2001) and were without a previous CVD event or diabetes at baseline. Main outcomes were all-cause mortality, mortality due to CHD, and mortality due to CVD. Cox regression analysis was used to quantify the mortality risk according to E-ECG responses.
During a follow-up of 14 years, 633 deaths (242 CVD and 150 CHD) were identified. Mortality rates and hazard ratios (HRs) across E-ECG responses were the following: for all-cause mortality: HR, 1.36; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-1.70 for equivocal responses and HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12-1.77 for abnormal responses (P(trend)<.001); for mortality due to CVD: HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.88-1.88 for equivocal responses and HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.46-2.84 for abnormal responses (P(trend)<.001); and for mortality due to CHD: HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.02-2.56 for equivocal responses and HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.62-3.69 for abnormal responses (P(trend)<.001). A positive gradient for CHD, CVD, and all-cause mortality rates across E-ECG categories within 3, 4, or 5 MetS components was observed (P<.001 for all).
Among men with MetS, an abnormal E-ECG response was associated with higher risk of all-cause, CVD, and CHD mortality. These findings underscore the importance of E-ECG tests to identify men with MetS who are at risk of dying.
在一大群患有代谢综合征(MetS)的无症状男性中,检查异常运动心电图(E-ECG)测试结果与死亡率(全因死亡率和冠心病[CHD]或心血管疾病[CVD]死亡率)之间的关联。
共有 9191 名男性(平均年龄 46.9 岁)符合 MetS 标准。所有人都完成了最大运动量的 E-ECG 跑步机测试(1979 年 5 月 14 日至 2001 年 4 月 9 日),并且在基线时没有 CVD 事件或糖尿病史。主要结局是全因死亡率、CHD 死亡率和 CVD 死亡率。使用 Cox 回归分析根据 E-ECG 反应量化死亡率风险。
在 14 年的随访期间,共发生 633 例死亡(242 例 CVD 和 150 例 CHD)。E-ECG 反应的死亡率和危险比(HR)如下:全因死亡率:HR,1.36;95%置信区间(CI)为 1.09-1.70 为不确定反应,HR,1.41;95%CI 为 1.12-1.77 为异常反应(P<0.001);CVD 死亡率:HR,1.29;95%CI 为 0.88-1.88 为不确定反应,HR,2.04;95%CI 为 1.46-2.84 为异常反应(P<0.001);CHD 死亡率:HR,1.62;95%CI 为 1.02-2.56 为不确定反应,HR,2.45;95%CI 为 1.62-3.69 为异常反应(P<0.001)。在 E-ECG 类别中,有 3、4 或 5 个 MetS 成分的 CHD、CVD 和全因死亡率呈正梯度(所有 P<0.001)。
在患有 MetS 的男性中,异常 E-ECG 反应与全因、CVD 和 CHD 死亡率风险增加相关。这些发现强调了 E-ECG 测试对识别有死亡风险的 MetS 男性的重要性。