Hsia Judith, Rodabough Rebecca J, Manson Joann E, Liu Simin, Freiberg Matthew S, Graettinger William, Rosal Milagros C, Cochrane Barb, Lloyd-Jones Donald, Robinson Jennifer G, Howard Barbara V
George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Mar;3(2):128-34. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.842385. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
The 2007 update to the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women recommend a simplified approach to risk stratification. We assigned Women's Health Initiative participants to risk categories as described in the guideline and evaluated clinical event rates within and between strata.
The Women's Health Initiative enrolled 161 808 women ages 50 to 79 years and followed them prospectively for 7.8 years (mean). Applying the 2007 AHA guideline categories, 11% of women were high risk, 72% at-risk, and 4% at optimal risk; 13% of women did not fall into any category, that is, lacked risk factors but did not adhere to a healthy lifestyle (moderate intensity exercise for 30 minute most days and <7% of calories from saturated fat). Among high risk, at-risk, and optimal risk women, rates of myocardial infarction/coronary death were 12.5%, 3.1%, and 1.1% per 10 years (P for trend <0.0001); the event rate was 1.3% among women who could not be categorized. We observed a graded relationship between risk category and cardiovascular event rates for white, black, Hispanic, and Asian women, although event rates differed among ethnic groups (P for interaction=0.002). The AHA guideline predicted coronary events with accuracy similar to current Framingham risk categories (area under receiver operating characteristic curve for Framingham risk, 0.665; for AHA risk, 0.664; P=0.94) but less well than proposed Framingham 10-year risk categories of <5%, 5% to 20%, and >20% (area under receiver operating characteristic curve for Framingham risk, 0.724; for AHA risk, 0.664; P<0.0001).
Risk stratification as proposed in the 2007 AHA guideline is simple, accessible to patients and providers, and identifies cardiovascular risk with accuracy similar to that of the current Framingham algorithm. Clinical Trial Registration- clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT00000611.
2007年美国心脏协会(AHA)女性心血管疾病预防指南更新版推荐采用简化的风险分层方法。我们将女性健康倡议参与者按照指南所述分为不同风险类别,并评估各层内及层间的临床事件发生率。
女性健康倡议纳入了161808名年龄在50至79岁之间的女性,并对她们进行了平均7.8年的前瞻性随访。应用2007年AHA指南类别,11%的女性为高危,72%为中危,4%为低危;13%的女性不属于任何类别,即缺乏危险因素但未坚持健康生活方式(大多数日子进行30分钟中等强度运动且饱和脂肪供能<7%)。在高危、中危和低危女性中,心肌梗死/冠心病死亡的发生率分别为每10年12.5%、3.1%和1.1%(趋势P<0.0001);在无法分类的女性中,事件发生率为1.3%。我们观察到白种、黑种、西班牙裔和亚裔女性的风险类别与心血管事件发生率之间存在分级关系,尽管不同种族的事件发生率有所不同(交互作用P=0.002)。AHA指南预测冠心病事件的准确性与当前弗明汉风险类别相似(弗明汉风险的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.665;AHA风险为0.664;P=0.94),但不如提议的弗明汉10年风险类别<5%、5%至20%和>20%(弗明汉风险的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.724;AHA风险为0.664;P<0.0001)。
2007年AHA指南中提出 的风险分层方法简单,患者和医疗服务提供者均可采用,且识别心血管风险的准确性与当前弗明汉算法相似。临床试验注册 - clinicaltrials.gov。标识符:NCT00000611。