Suppr超能文献

《好奇心与探索量表第二版:编制、因素结构及心理测量学》

The Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II: Development, Factor Structure, and Psychometrics.

作者信息

Kashdan Todd B, Gallagher Matthew W, Silvia Paul J, Winterstein Beate P, Breen William E, Terhar Daniel, Steger Michael F

机构信息

George Mason University.

出版信息

J Res Pers. 2009 Dec 1;43(6):987-998. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.011.

Abstract

Given curiosity's fundamental role in motivation, learning, and well-being, we sought to refine the measurement of trait curiosity with an improved version of the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory (CEI; Kashdan, Rose, & Fincham, 2004). A preliminary pool of 36 items was administered to 311 undergraduate students, who also completed measures of emotion, emotion regulation, personality, and well-being. Factor analyses indicated a two factor model-motivation to seek out knowledge and new experiences (Stretching; 5 items) and a willingness to embrace the novel, uncertain, and unpredictable nature of everyday life (Embracing; 5 items). In two additional samples (ns = 150 and 119), we cross-validated this factor structure and provided initial evidence for construct validity. This includes positive correlations with personal growth, openness to experience, autonomy, purpose in life, self-acceptance, psychological flexibility, positive affect, and positive social relations, among others. Applying item response theory (IRT) to these samples (n = 578), we showed that the items have good discrimination and a desirable breadth of difficulty. The item information functions and test information function were centered near zero, indicating that the scale assesses the mid-range of the latent curiosity trait most reliably. The findings thus far provide good evidence for the psychometric properties of the 10-item CEI-II.

摘要

鉴于好奇心在动机、学习和幸福中具有根本性作用,我们试图通过改进版的好奇心与探索量表(CEI;卡什丹、罗斯和芬奇姆,2004年)来完善特质好奇心的测量。对311名本科生施测了一个由36个项目组成的初步题库,这些学生还完成了情绪、情绪调节、人格和幸福感的测量。因素分析表明存在一个双因素模型——寻求知识和新体验的动机(拓展;5个项目)以及愿意接受日常生活中新颖、不确定和不可预测的性质(接纳;5个项目)。在另外两个样本(样本量分别为150和119)中,我们对这个因素结构进行了交叉验证,并为结构效度提供了初步证据。这包括与个人成长、经验开放性、自主性、生活目的、自我接纳、心理灵活性、积极情绪和积极社会关系等的正相关。将项目反应理论(IRT)应用于这些样本(n = 578),我们表明这些项目具有良好的区分度和理想的难度广度。项目信息函数和测验信息函数集中在零点附近,表明该量表最可靠地评估了潜在好奇心特质的中等范围。迄今为止的研究结果为10个项目的CEI-II的心理测量特性提供了有力证据。

相似文献

2
Psychometric of the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II in Indonesia.印度尼西亚好奇心与探索量表第二版的心理测量学
J Public Health Res. 2020 Sep 3;9(3):1745. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2020.1745. eCollection 2020 Jul 28.
7
[Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory].[10 项大五人格量表法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2020 Dec;46(6):455-462. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
What Good Are Positive Emotions?积极情绪有什么好处?
Rev Gen Psychol. 1998 Sep;2(3):300-319. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验