Hatzenbuehler Mark L, Dovidio John F, Nolen-Hoeksema Susan, Phills Curtis E
Yale University.
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2009 Nov 1;45(6):1316-1320. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.005.
Members of stigmatized groups are at increased risk for mental health problems, and recent research has suggested that emotion dysregulation may be one mechanism explaining the stigma-distress association. However, little is known regarding characteristics that predict vulnerabilities to emotion dysregulation and subsequent distress. We examined whether anti-gay attitudes would predict poorer emotion regulation and greater psychological distress in 31 lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) respondents. Respondents completed implicit and explicit attitude measures at baseline, and participated in an experience sampling study examining stigma-related stressors, emotion regulation strategies, and mood over the course of ten days. Implicit and explicit attitude measures were not correlated. LGB respondents with greater implicit anti-gay attitudes engaged in significantly more rumination and suppression and reported more psychological distress. Rumination fully mediated the prospective association between implicit prejudicial attitudes and psychological distress, and suppression was a marginally significant mediator.
受污名化群体的成员出现心理健康问题的风险更高,最近的研究表明,情绪失调可能是解释污名与痛苦之间关联的一种机制。然而,对于预测情绪失调易感性及随后痛苦的特征,我们知之甚少。我们调查了31名女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋(LGB)受访者中,恐同态度是否会预测较差的情绪调节能力和更大的心理痛苦。受访者在基线时完成了内隐和外显态度测量,并参与了一项经验抽样研究,该研究在十天内考察了与污名相关的压力源、情绪调节策略和情绪。内隐和外显态度测量不相关。内隐恐同态度更强的LGB受访者进行更多的沉思和压抑,报告的心理痛苦也更多。沉思完全中介了内隐偏见态度与心理痛苦之间的前瞻性关联,压抑是一个边缘显著的中介因素。