Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, 5th Floor, Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital Campus, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, Denmark Hill, London, UK.
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Feb;49(2):661-680. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01502-2. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
This study tested the mechanisms by which social stigma contributes to psychological distress in lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals. A large community sample (N = 4248, M age = 29.9 years, 42.9% female, 57.1% male, 35.7% bisexual, 64.3% lesbian/gay, 9.9% non-white) was recruited using targeted and general advertisements for an online cross-sectional survey. Participants completed measures of childhood gender nonconformity, prejudice events, victimization, microaggressions, sexual orientation concealment, sexual orientation disclosure, expectations of rejection, self-stigma, rumination, and distress. Structural equation modeling was used to test the relationships between these variables in a model based upon minority stress theory and the integrative mediation framework with childhood gender nonconformity as the initial independent variable and distress (depression, anxiety, and well-being) as the final dependent variable. The results broadly support the hypothesized model. The final model had good fit χ(37) = 440.99, p < .001, TLI = .96, CFI = .98, RMSEA = .05 [.05, .06] and explained 50.2% of the variance in psychological distress and 24.8% in rumination. Sexual orientation and gender had moderating effects on some individual paths. Results should be considered in the context of the cross-sectional nature of the data, which prevented tests of causality, and self-report measures used, which are vulnerable to bias. Findings indicate strong relationships between minority stressors and psychological distress in lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals, which are partially accounted for by rumination. These results may inform the development of interventions that address the added burden of minority stress among lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals.
本研究旨在检验社会污名对男女同性恋、双性恋个体心理困扰的影响机制。通过目标和一般广告,在一个大型社区样本(N=4248,M 年龄=29.9 岁,女性占 42.9%,男性占 57.1%,双性恋占 35.7%,同性恋/女同性恋占 64.3%,非白人占 9.9%)中招募了参与者,让他们完成了儿童期性别非规范、偏见事件、受害、微侵犯、性取向隐瞒、性取向披露、被拒绝的预期、自我污名、反刍和困扰等方面的测量。结构方程模型用于测试这些变量之间的关系,模型基于少数群体压力理论和综合中介框架,以儿童期性别非规范为初始自变量,以困扰(抑郁、焦虑和幸福感)为最终因变量。结果广泛支持了假设模型。最终模型具有良好的拟合度(χ(37)=440.99,p<.001,TLI=.96,CFI=.98,RMSEA=.05[.05,.06]),可以解释 50.2%的心理困扰和 24.8%的反刍方差。性取向和性别对一些个体路径有调节作用。结果应结合数据的横断面性质、自我报告测量的易受偏差的特点来考虑。研究结果表明,男女同性恋、双性恋个体的少数群体压力源与心理困扰之间存在强烈关系,反刍在其中部分起作用。这些结果可能为解决男女同性恋、双性恋个体少数群体压力带来的额外负担的干预措施的制定提供信息。