Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2010 Feb 9;5(2):e9119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009119.
Intravaginal practices are commonly used by women to manage their vaginal health and sexual life. These practices could, however, affect intravaginal mucosal integrity. The objectives of this study were to examine evidence for associations between: intravaginal practices and acquisition of HIV infection; intravaginal practices and vaginal infections; and vaginal infections and HIV acquisition.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We conducted a systematic review of prospective longitudinal studies, searching 15 electronic databases of journals and abstracts from two international conferences to 31(st) January 2008. Relevant articles were selected and data extracted in duplicate. Results were examined visually in forest plots and combined using random effects meta-analysis where appropriate. Of 2120 unique references we included 22 publications from 15 different studies in sub-Saharan Africa and the USA. Seven publications from five studies examined a range of intravaginal practices and HIV infection. No specific vaginal practices showed a protective effect against HIV or vaginal infections. Insertion of products for sex was associated with HIV in unadjusted analyses; only one study gave an adjusted estimate, which showed no association (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.71, 1.67). HIV incidence was higher in women reporting intravaginal cleansing but confidence intervals were wide and heterogeneity high (adjusted hazard ratio 1.88, 95%CI 0.53, 6.69, I(2) 83.2%). HIV incidence was higher in women with bacterial vaginosis (adjusted effect 1.57, 95%CI 1.26, 1.94, I(2) 19.0%) and Trichomonas vaginalis (adjusted effect 1.64, 95%CI 1.28, 2.09, I(2) 0.0%).
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: A pathway linking intravaginal cleaning practices with vaginal infections that increase susceptibility to HIV infection is plausible but conclusive evidence is lacking. Intravaginal practices do not appear to protect women from vaginal infections or HIV and some might be harmful.
阴道内操作是女性管理其阴道健康和性生活的常用方法。然而,这些操作可能会影响阴道黏膜的完整性。本研究的目的是检验以下关联的证据:阴道内操作与 HIV 感染的获得;阴道内操作与阴道感染;以及阴道感染与 HIV 感染的获得。
方法/主要发现:我们对前瞻性纵向研究进行了系统评价,检索了 15 个电子期刊数据库和两个国际会议的摘要,检索时间截至 2008 年 1 月 31 日。选择相关文章并进行重复数据提取。结果以森林图的形式进行视觉检查,并在适当的情况下使用随机效应荟萃分析进行组合。在 2120 个独特的参考文献中,我们纳入了来自撒哈拉以南非洲和美国的 15 项不同研究的 22 篇出版物。有 7 篇来自 5 项研究的出版物考察了各种阴道内操作与 HIV 感染的关系。没有特定的阴道操作显示出对 HIV 或阴道感染的保护作用。未经调整的分析显示,用于性行为的产品插入与 HIV 相关;只有一项研究提供了调整后的估计值,显示没有关联(危险比 1.09,95%置信区间,CI 0.71,1.67)。报告阴道内清洁的女性中 HIV 发病率更高,但置信区间较宽且异质性较高(调整后的危险比 1.88,95%CI 0.53,6.69,I(2)83.2%)。细菌性阴道病(调整后的影响 1.57,95%CI 1.26,1.94,I(2)19.0%)和阴道毛滴虫(调整后的影响 1.64,95%CI 1.28,2.09,I(2)0.0%)的女性中 HIV 发病率更高。
结论/意义:将阴道内清洁操作与增加 HIV 感染易感性的阴道感染联系起来的途径是合理的,但缺乏确凿的证据。阴道内操作似乎不能保护女性免受阴道感染或 HIV 的侵害,有些操作甚至可能有害。