• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

浸润性小叶癌与浸润性导管癌:基于分期匹配的结局比较。

Invasive lobular vs. ductal breast cancer: a stage-matched comparison of outcomes.

机构信息

John Wayne Cancer Institute at Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jul;17(7):1862-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0953-z. Epub 2010 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-010-0953-z
PMID:20162457
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is less common than invasive ductal breast cancer (IDC), more difficult to detect mammographically, and usually diagnosed at a later stage. Does delayed diagnosis of ILC affect survival? We used a national registry to compare outcomes of patients with stage-matched ILC and IDC.

METHODS

Query of the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) tumor registry identified 263,408 women diagnosed with IDC or ILC between 1993 and 2003. Survival of patients matched by T and N stage was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank analysis.

RESULTS

When compared with IDC, ILC was more likely to be >2 cm (43.1 vs. 32.6%; P < 0.001), lymph node positive (36.8 vs. 34.4%; P < 0.001), and ER positive (93.1 vs. 75.6%; P < 0.001). The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was significantly better for patients with ILC than for those with IDC, before (90 vs. 88%; P < 0.001) and after matching for stage T1N0 (98 vs. 96%; P < 0.001), T2N0 (94 vs. 88%; P < 0.001), and T3N0 (92 vs. 83%, P < 0.001). The 5-year DSS for patients with nodal metastasis of ILC vs. IDC was 89% vs. 88% (P = NS) for stage T1N1, 81 vs. 73% (P < 0.001) for T2N1, and 72 vs. 56% (P < 0.001) for T3N1. Multivariate analysis identified a 14% survival benefit for ILC (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.80-0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Stage-matched prognosis is better for patients with ILC than for those with IDC. Our findings support a different biology for ILC and are important for counseling and risk stratification.

摘要

背景

浸润性小叶乳腺癌(ILC)比浸润性导管乳腺癌(IDC)少见,在乳房 X 光片中更难检测到,并且通常在较晚的阶段诊断出来。ILC 的延迟诊断是否会影响生存率?我们使用国家登记处比较了分期匹配的 ILC 和 IDC 患者的结局。

方法

通过国家癌症研究所的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)肿瘤登记处查询,确定了 1993 年至 2003 年期间诊断为 IDC 或 ILC 的 263408 名女性。使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和对数秩分析比较 T 期和 N 期匹配的患者的生存情况。

结果

与 IDC 相比,ILC 更有可能大于 2cm(43.1%比 32.6%;P<0.001)、淋巴结阳性(36.8%比 34.4%;P<0.001)和 ER 阳性(93.1%比 75.6%;P<0.001)。ILC 患者的 5 年疾病特异性生存率(DSS)明显优于 IDC 患者,未经分期匹配时(90%比 88%;P<0.001)和 T1N0 分期匹配时(98%比 96%;P<0.001)、T2N0(94%比 88%;P<0.001)和 T3N0(92%比 83%,P<0.001)。ILC 患者淋巴结转移的 5 年 DSS 为 T1N1 期 89%比 IDC 88%(P=NS),T2N1 期 81%比 IDC 73%(P<0.001),T3N1 期 72%比 IDC 56%(P<0.001)。多变量分析确定 ILC 的生存率提高了 14%(风险比 0.86,95%置信区间 0.80-0.92)。

结论

分期匹配的预后对 ILC 患者比 IDC 患者更好。我们的研究结果支持 ILC 具有不同的生物学特性,这对咨询和风险分层很重要。

相似文献

1
Invasive lobular vs. ductal breast cancer: a stage-matched comparison of outcomes.浸润性小叶癌与浸润性导管癌:基于分期匹配的结局比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jul;17(7):1862-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0953-z. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
2
The prognosis of invasive ductal carcinoma, lobular carcinoma and mixed ductal and lobular carcinoma according to molecular subtypes of the breast.根据乳腺癌的分子亚型,评估浸润性导管癌、小叶癌和混合性导管及小叶癌的预后。
Breast Cancer. 2021 Jan;28(1):187-195. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01146-4. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
3
Comparison of clinical outcomes between luminal invasive ductal carcinoma and luminal invasive lobular carcinoma.管腔型浸润性导管癌与管腔型浸润性小叶癌临床结局的比较。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Mar 25;16:248. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2275-4.
4
Long-Term Survival Differences Between T1-2 Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer and Corresponding Ductal Carcinoma After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Propensity-Scored Matched Longitudinal Cohort Study.保乳手术后 T1-2 浸润性小叶乳腺癌与相应导管癌的长期生存差异:倾向评分匹配的纵向队列研究。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2019 Feb;19(1):e101-e115. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
5
Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy for Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: A Comparative Utilization and Outcomes Study.浸润性小叶癌的乳房切除术后放射治疗:一项比较性利用与结局研究
Clin Breast Cancer. 2016 Aug;16(4):319-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
6
Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: A special histological type compared with invasive ductal carcinoma.乳腺浸润性小叶癌:一种与浸润性导管癌相比的特殊组织学类型。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 1;12(9):e0182397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182397. eCollection 2017.
7
Comparison of the clinicopathological features of invasive ductal, invasive lobular, and mixed (invasive ductal + invasive lobular) carcinoma of the breast.乳腺浸润性导管癌、浸润性小叶癌及混合性(浸润性导管 + 浸润性小叶)癌的临床病理特征比较。
Breast Cancer. 2015 Jul;22(4):374-81. doi: 10.1007/s12282-013-0489-8. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
8
Relative effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive lobular compared with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.乳腺浸润性小叶癌与浸润性导管癌辅助化疗的相对疗效
Cancer. 2017 Aug 15;123(16):3015-3021. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30699. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
9
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Isolated Tumor Cells in Invasive Lobular Versus Ductal Breast Cancer.浸润性小叶癌与导管癌中前哨淋巴结活检及孤立肿瘤细胞的研究
Clin Breast Cancer. 2016 Aug;16(4):e75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
10
Lobular breast cancer: same survival and local control compared with ductal cancer, but should both be treated the same way? analysis of an institutional database over a 10-year period.乳腺小叶癌:与导管癌相比,生存率和局部控制率相同,但两者的治疗方式应该相同吗?对 10 年期间机构数据库的分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Apr;19(4):1107-14. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1907-9. Epub 2011 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Demographic and clinical predictors of treatment outcomes in invasive lobular carcinoma breast cancer: insights from Cox regression analysis.浸润性小叶癌乳腺癌治疗结果的人口统计学和临床预测因素:来自Cox回归分析的见解
Discov Oncol. 2025 Jul 7;16(1):1273. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-03029-6.
2
Clinical Characteristics and Survival Outcomes of Metastatic Invasive Lobular and Ductal Carcinoma.转移性浸润性小叶癌和导管癌的临床特征及生存结果
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e251888. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1888.
3
Human Cytomegalovirus Infection and Breast Cancer: A Literature Review of Clinical and Experimental Data.
人巨细胞病毒感染与乳腺癌:临床与实验数据的文献综述
Biology (Basel). 2025 Feb 8;14(2):174. doi: 10.3390/biology14020174.
4
Delving into female breast cancer: Distinct disease-specific survival outcomes between invasive lobular and ductal carcinomas revealed by propensity score matching.深入探讨女性乳腺癌:倾向评分匹配揭示浸润性小叶癌和导管癌之间不同的疾病特异性生存结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 23;19(12):e0300116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300116. eCollection 2024.
5
Psychological Considerations Associated with Lobular Breast Cancer.与小叶型乳腺癌相关的心理学考量
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2025 Feb;27(2):98-104. doi: 10.1007/s11920-024-01578-1. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
6
Nomograms to predict the long-term prognosis for non-metastatic invasive lobular breast carcinoma: a population-based study.列线图预测非转移性浸润性小叶乳腺癌的长期预后:一项基于人群的研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 22;14(1):19477. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68931-5.
7
Early Stage Breast Cancer: Does Histologic Subtype (Ductal vs. Lobular) Impact 5 Year Overall Survival?早期乳腺癌:组织学亚型(导管癌与小叶癌)对5年总生存率有影响吗?
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 15;16(8):1509. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081509.
8
Effect of histological breast cancer subtypes invasive lobular versus non-special type on survival in early intermediate-to-high-risk breast carcinoma: results from the SUCCESS trials.早期中高危乳腺癌中组织学乳腺癌亚型浸润性小叶癌与非特殊型对生存的影响:SUCCESS 试验结果。
Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Dec 14;25(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01750-0.
9
Histologic tumor type as a determinant of survival in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, pT1-3 invasive ductal and lobular breast cancer.组织学肿瘤类型是激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性、pT1-3 浸润性导管癌和小叶癌生存的决定因素。
Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Nov 22;25(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01745-x.
10
Is Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction on Breast Cancer Patients Oncologically Safe? A Preliminary Study.乳腺癌患者立即进行淋巴重建在肿瘤学上是否安全?一项初步研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Nov 7;11(11):e5385. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005385. eCollection 2023 Nov.