Suppr超能文献

乳腺浸润性小叶癌:一种与浸润性导管癌相比的特殊组织学类型。

Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: A special histological type compared with invasive ductal carcinoma.

作者信息

Chen Zheling, Yang Jiao, Li Shuting, Lv Meng, Shen Yanwei, Wang Biyuan, Li Pan, Yi Min, Zhao Xiao'ai, Zhang Lingxiao, Wang Le, Yang Jin

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.

Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Sep 1;12(9):e0182397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182397. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

The clinical outcomes and therapeutic strategies for infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) and infiltrating lobular carcinoma (ILC) are not uniform. The primary objectives of this study were to identify the differences in the clinical characteristics and prognoses between ILC and IDC, and identify the high-risk population based on the hormone receptor status and metastasis sites. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database was searched and patients diagnosed with ILC or IDC from 1990 to 2013 were identified. In total,796,335 patients were analyzed, including 85,048 withILC (10.7%) and 711,287 withIDC (89.3%). The ILC group was correlatedwith older age, larger tumor size, later stage, lower grade, metastasis disease(M1) disease, and greater counts ofpositive lymph nodesandestrogen-receptor-positive (ER)/progesterone receptor-positive (PR) positive nodes. The overall survival showed an early advantage for ILC but a worse outcome after 5 years. Regarding the disease-specific survival, the IDC cohort had advantages over the ILC group, both during the early years and long-term. In hormone status and metastasis site subgroup analyses, the ER+/PR+ subgroup had the best survival, while the ER+/PR- subgroup had the worst outcome, especially the ILC cohort. ILC and IDC had different metastasis patterns. The proportion of bone metastasis was higher in the ILC group (91.52%) than that in the IDC (76.04%), and the ILC group was more likely to have multiple metastasis sites. Survival analyses showed patients with ILC had a higher risk of liver metastasis (disease-specific survival[DSS]; P = 0.046), but had a better overall survival than the bone metastasis group (P<0.0001). We concluded that the long-term prognosis for ILC was poorer than that for IDC, and the ER+/PR- subgroup had the worst outcome. Therefore, the metastasis pattern and prognosis must be seriously evaluated, and a combination of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy should be considered.

摘要

浸润性导管癌(IDC)和浸润性小叶癌(ILC)的临床结局和治疗策略并不一致。本研究的主要目的是确定ILC和IDC在临床特征和预后方面的差异,并根据激素受体状态和转移部位确定高危人群。检索了监测、流行病学和最终结果计划数据库,确定了1990年至2013年期间诊断为ILC或IDC的患者。总共分析了796335例患者,其中85048例为ILC(10.7%),711287例为IDC(89.3%)。ILC组与年龄较大、肿瘤较大、分期较晚、分级较低、转移疾病(M1)、阳性淋巴结数量较多以及雌激素受体阳性(ER)/孕激素受体阳性(PR)阳性淋巴结数量较多相关。总体生存率显示ILC在早期有优势,但5年后结局较差。关于疾病特异性生存率,IDC队列在早期和长期都优于ILC组。在激素状态和转移部位亚组分析中,ER+/PR+亚组生存率最佳,而ER+/PR-亚组结局最差,尤其是ILC队列。ILC和IDC有不同的转移模式。ILC组骨转移比例(91.52%)高于IDC组(76.04%),且ILC组更易出现多个转移部位。生存分析显示,ILC患者肝转移风险较高(疾病特异性生存率[DSS];P = 0.046),但总体生存率优于骨转移组(P<0.0001)。我们得出结论,ILC的长期预后比IDC差,ER+/PR-亚组结局最差。因此,必须认真评估转移模式和预后,并考虑内分泌治疗和化疗联合应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c991/5580913/dbf44df6a8fd/pone.0182397.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验