• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定 SARS 和类 SARS 疾病的政策选择 - 德尔菲研究。

Developing policy options for SARS and SARS-like diseases - a Delphi study.

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark.

出版信息

Glob Public Health. 2010;5(6):663-75. doi: 10.1080/17441690903473220.

DOI:10.1080/17441690903473220
PMID:20162483
Abstract

The objective of the SARSControl Delphi study was to develop options for national and international emerging infectious diseases policies. The aim of this paper is to present the results of the study, which gathered expert opinions on gaps and inconsistencies concerning preparedness and response planning for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and SARS-like diseases. The Delphi technique was employed, which comprised a pilot round, two written rounds and a face-to-face meeting. The Delphi panel consisted of 38 experts from 22 countries, who highlighted the necessity to test plans and stressed the importance of surveillance measures for the swift containment of communicable disease outbreaks and the inclusion of detailed triage plans in national pandemic plans. The experts also suggested a need to define criteria for testing pandemic preparedness plans at different regional levels. New policy alternatives were identified, such as the need for generic plans on pandemics and universal access to healthcare during an outbreak. The usefulness of some non-medical interventions, such as bans on travel, could not be established and need further research. Dissemination of the findings will help to bridge gaps and rectify inconsistencies in current pandemic planning and response strategies for SARS and SARS-like diseases, as well as add valuable knowledge towards the development of national and international emerging infectious disease policies.

摘要

SARSControl 德尔菲研究的目的是为国家和国际新发传染病政策制定方案。本文旨在介绍这项研究的结果,该研究收集了专家对严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)和类似 SARS 疾病的准备和应对规划方面的差距和不一致意见。研究采用了德尔菲技术,包括一轮试点、两轮书面和一次面对面会议。德尔菲专家组由来自 22 个国家的 38 名专家组成,他们强调了测试计划的必要性,并强调了监测措施对于迅速控制传染病爆发的重要性,以及在国家大流行计划中纳入详细分诊计划的重要性。专家们还建议需要为不同地区级别制定测试大流行准备计划的标准。确定了新的政策替代方案,例如制定通用大流行计划和在疫情爆发期间普及医疗保健的必要性。一些非医疗干预措施的有效性无法确定,例如旅行禁令,需要进一步研究。传播这些发现将有助于弥合 SARS 和类似 SARS 疾病大流行规划和应对策略方面的差距和不一致,并为制定国家和国际新发传染病政策提供有价值的知识。

相似文献

1
Developing policy options for SARS and SARS-like diseases - a Delphi study.制定 SARS 和类 SARS 疾病的政策选择 - 德尔菲研究。
Glob Public Health. 2010;5(6):663-75. doi: 10.1080/17441690903473220.
2
[Prevention and control of infectious diseases with pandemic potential: the EU-project SARSControl].[具有大流行潜力的传染病防控:欧盟项目“非典防控”]
Gesundheitswesen. 2009 Jun;71(6):351-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1224103. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
3
Homelessness and the response to emerging infectious disease outbreaks: lessons from SARS.无家可归与对新出现的传染病暴发的应对:非典带来的教训。
J Urban Health. 2008 May;85(3):402-10. doi: 10.1007/s11524-008-9270-2. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
4
Lessons from SARS in an age of emerging infections.新发传染病时代的非典教训
Med Lav. 2006 Mar-Apr;97(2):369-75.
5
Identifying essential resource parameters for pandemic preparedness and response: an international Delphi study within the EU PANDEM-2 project.确定大流行防范和应对的基本资源参数:欧盟PANDEM - 2项目中的一项国际德尔菲研究
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 15;14(12):e079609. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079609.
6
Travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.旅行相关的控制措施以遏制 COVID-19 大流行:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 5;10:CD013717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013717.
7
Pandemic influenza control in Europe and the constraints resulting from incoherent public health laws.欧洲大流行性流感的控制及不统一的公共卫生法律带来的限制。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Sep 3;10:532. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-532.
8
Preparing for a possible SARS resurgence.为可能出现的非典疫情卷土重来做准备。
Am J Nurs. 2003 Oct;103(10):104. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200310000-00041.
9
The role of the hotel industry in the response to emerging epidemics: a case study of SARS in 2003 and H1N1 swine flu in 2009 in Hong Kong.酒店业在应对新发传染病中的作用:以 2003 年 SARS 和 2009 年香港 H1N1 猪流感为例。
Global Health. 2018 Nov 27;14(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0438-6.
10
Developing pandemic preparedness in Europe in the 21st century: experience, evolution and next steps.21 世纪欧洲的大流行防范准备:经验、演变和下一步。
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Apr 1;90(4):311-7. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.097972.

引用本文的文献

1
Main Factors Affecting the Readiness and Responsiveness of Healthcare Systems during Epidemic Crises: A Scoping Review on Cases of SARS, MERS, and COVID-19.影响疫情期间医疗保健系统准备和响应能力的主要因素:SARS、MERS 和 COVID-19 病例的范围综述。
Iran J Med Sci. 2021 Mar;46(2):81-92. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2020.87608.1801.
2
Effects of heterogeneous self-protection awareness on resource-epidemic coevolution dynamics.异质自我保护意识对资源-疫情协同进化动态的影响。
Appl Math Comput. 2020 Nov 15;385:125428. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2020.125428. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
3
[Validation of a questionnaire on attitudes and practice of physical activity and other healthy habits through the Delphi method].
通过德尔菲法对一份关于体育活动态度与实践及其他健康习惯的问卷进行验证
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2019 Sep 16;93:e201909081.
4
Feasibility of implementing recommendations to improve communicable diseases surveillance--a modified Delphi study.实施改善传染病监测建议的可行性——一项改良德尔菲研究
Afr Health Sci. 2011 Aug;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S93-9. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v11i3.70077.
5
Where there is no evidence: use of expert consensus methods to fill the evidence gap in low-income countries and cultural minorities.在缺乏证据的情况下:利用专家共识方法填补低收入国家和少数族裔的证据空白。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2010 Dec 21;4:33. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-4-33.