Suppr超能文献

制定 SARS 和类 SARS 疾病的政策选择 - 德尔菲研究。

Developing policy options for SARS and SARS-like diseases - a Delphi study.

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark.

出版信息

Glob Public Health. 2010;5(6):663-75. doi: 10.1080/17441690903473220.

Abstract

The objective of the SARSControl Delphi study was to develop options for national and international emerging infectious diseases policies. The aim of this paper is to present the results of the study, which gathered expert opinions on gaps and inconsistencies concerning preparedness and response planning for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and SARS-like diseases. The Delphi technique was employed, which comprised a pilot round, two written rounds and a face-to-face meeting. The Delphi panel consisted of 38 experts from 22 countries, who highlighted the necessity to test plans and stressed the importance of surveillance measures for the swift containment of communicable disease outbreaks and the inclusion of detailed triage plans in national pandemic plans. The experts also suggested a need to define criteria for testing pandemic preparedness plans at different regional levels. New policy alternatives were identified, such as the need for generic plans on pandemics and universal access to healthcare during an outbreak. The usefulness of some non-medical interventions, such as bans on travel, could not be established and need further research. Dissemination of the findings will help to bridge gaps and rectify inconsistencies in current pandemic planning and response strategies for SARS and SARS-like diseases, as well as add valuable knowledge towards the development of national and international emerging infectious disease policies.

摘要

SARSControl 德尔菲研究的目的是为国家和国际新发传染病政策制定方案。本文旨在介绍这项研究的结果,该研究收集了专家对严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)和类似 SARS 疾病的准备和应对规划方面的差距和不一致意见。研究采用了德尔菲技术,包括一轮试点、两轮书面和一次面对面会议。德尔菲专家组由来自 22 个国家的 38 名专家组成,他们强调了测试计划的必要性,并强调了监测措施对于迅速控制传染病爆发的重要性,以及在国家大流行计划中纳入详细分诊计划的重要性。专家们还建议需要为不同地区级别制定测试大流行准备计划的标准。确定了新的政策替代方案,例如制定通用大流行计划和在疫情爆发期间普及医疗保健的必要性。一些非医疗干预措施的有效性无法确定,例如旅行禁令,需要进一步研究。传播这些发现将有助于弥合 SARS 和类似 SARS 疾病大流行规划和应对策略方面的差距和不一致,并为制定国家和国际新发传染病政策提供有价值的知识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验