Department of Medical Microbiology, Campus Drie Eiken, University of Antwerp, S3, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium.
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Apr;48(4):1040-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01745-09. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
Rapid laboratory diagnosis is critical for treating, managing, and preventing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. We evaluated and compared the potential for MRSA detection of five chromogenic media, Brilliance MRSA agar (Oxoid), ChromID (bioMérieux), MRSASelect (Bio-Rad), CHROMagar (CHROMagar Microbiology), and BBL-CHROMagar (BD Diagnostics). Media were tested with log serial dilutions (10(0) to 10(6) CFU) of pure isolates of MRSA (n = 60), non-MRSA (n = 27), and defined mixtures thereof simulating clinical samples (n = 84). Further evaluations were done on pre-enriched nasal and groin screening swabs (n = 213) from 165 hospitalized patients. Randomized samples were spiral plated on each medium and independently scored by five investigators for characteristic colonies at 24 and 48 h of incubation. Confirmatory testing of up to five putative MRSA colonies recovered from each medium was done. The cumulative average sensitivity with isolates, mixtures, and clinical samples was the highest for Brilliance MRSA agar (97%) and similar for the other four media (>or=92%). The cumulative average specificity was the highest for BBL-CHROMagar (99%), followed by MRSASelect (98%), CHROMagar (97%), ChromID (89%), and Brilliance MRSA agar (86%). All of the media detected MRSA at 10 and 1 CFU, although at these low loads, few MRSA samples harboring SCCmec type III or IV were misinterpreted as non-MRSA by investigators. False-positive results were mainly due to methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis. For an arbitrary MRSA prevalence of 5% and based on patient sample evaluations, the positive predictive values for BBL-CHROMagar and CHROMagar ( approximately 84%) were the highest. The negative predictive values of all of the media were >or=92% for MRSA prevalences ranging from 5% to 30%. In conclusion, BBL-CHROMagar and CHROMagar gave the best overall results for detection of MRSA, irrespective of the sample concentration, investigator, or incubation period.
快速的实验室诊断对于治疗、管理和预防耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染至关重要。我们评估并比较了五种显色培养基检测 MRSA 的潜力,包括 Brilliance MRSA 琼脂(Oxoid)、ChromID(bioMérieux)、MRSASelect(Bio-Rad)、CHROMagar(CHROMagar Microbiology)和 BBL-CHROMagar(BD Diagnostics)。用纯 MRSA (n = 60)、非 MRSA (n = 27)和模拟临床样本的混合菌液(n = 84)对数级稀释(10(0) 至 10(6) CFU)对培养基进行了测试。对来自 165 名住院患者的 213 份预富集鼻拭子和腹股沟拭子进行了进一步评估。将随机样本分别接种于各培养基上,由五名观察者在 24 和 48 小时孵育后独立对特征性菌落进行评分。对从每种培养基中回收的多达 5 个疑似 MRSA 菌落进行了确证试验。用分离株、混合株和临床样本进行累积平均检测敏感性最高的是 Brilliance MRSA 琼脂(97%),其他四种培养基(>or=92%)的累积平均检测敏感性相似。累积平均特异性最高的是 BBL-CHROMagar(99%),其次是 MRSASelect(98%)、CHROMagar(97%)、ChromID(89%)和 Brilliance MRSA 琼脂(86%)。所有培养基均能在 10 和 1 CFU 时检测到 MRSA,尽管在这些低负荷水平下,一些携带 SCCmec 类型 III 或 IV 的 MRSA 样本被观察者错误地解释为非 MRSA。假阳性结果主要归因于耐甲氧西林表皮葡萄球菌。对于任意 5%的 MRSA 流行率,基于患者样本评估,BBL-CHROMagar 和 CHROMagar 的阳性预测值(约 84%)最高。对于 5%至 30%的 MRSA 流行率,所有培养基的阴性预测值均>or=92%。无论样本浓度、观察者或孵育期如何,BBL-CHROMagar 和 CHROMagar 对 MRSA 的检测均能提供最佳的整体结果。