Suppr超能文献

MRSA 筛查琼脂:两种不同选择性琼脂逐步诊断方法用于筛查耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的评估。

Screening agars for MRSA: evaluation of a stepwise diagnostic approach with two different selective agars for the screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

机构信息

Department of Tropical Medicine at the Bernhard Nocht Institute, German Armed Forces Hospital of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Mil Med Res. 2015 Jul 21;2:18. doi: 10.1186/s40779-015-0046-1. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) poses a hygiene risk that does not spare field hospitals or military medical field camps during military deployments. Diagnostic options for unambiguously identifying MRSA isolates are usually scarce in military environments. In this study, we assessed the stepwise application of two different selective agars for the specific identification of MRSA in screening analyses.

METHODS

Nasal swabs from 1541 volunteers were subjected to thioglycollate broth enrichment and subsequently screened on CHROMagar MRSA selective agar for the identification of MRSA. The MRSA identity of suspicious-looking colonies was confirmed afterwards or excluded by another selective agar, chromID MRSA. All isolates from the selective agars with MRSA-specific colony morphology were identified by biochemical methods and mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

The initial CHROMagar MRSA screening identified suspicious colonies in 36 out of 1541 samples. A total of 25 of these 36 isolates showed MRSA-like growth on chromID agar. Out of these 25 isolates, 24 were confirmed as MRSA, while one isolate was identified as Staphylococcus kloosii. From the 11 strains that did not show suspicious growth on chromID agar, 3 were methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA, with one instance of co-colonization with Corynebacterium spp.), 2 were confirmed as MRSA (with 1 instance of co-colonization with MSSA), 2 were lost during passaging and could not be re-cultured, one could not be identified by the applied approaches, and the remaining 3 strains were identified as Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Staphylococcus hominis (co-colonized with Macrococcus caseolyticus) and Staphylococcus cohnii, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of the selective agar CHROMagar MRSA alone proved to be too non-specific to allow for a reliable diagnosis of the presence of MRSA. The combined use of two selective agars in a stepwise approach reduced this non-specificity with an acceptably low loss of sensitivity. Accordingly, such a stepwise screening approach might be an option for resource-restricted military medical field camps.

摘要

背景

耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)定植会带来卫生风险,即使在军事部署期间,野战医院或军事医疗野战营地也无法幸免。在军事环境中,用于明确鉴定 MRSA 分离株的诊断选项通常很少。在这项研究中,我们评估了两步法应用两种不同选择性琼脂,用于在筛选分析中特异性鉴定 MRSA。

方法

1541 名志愿者的鼻拭子进行巯基酸盐肉汤富集,随后在 CHROMagar MRSA 选择性琼脂上筛选,以鉴定 MRSA。可疑外观菌落的 MRSA 身份随后通过另一种选择性琼脂 chromID MRSA 进行确认或排除。所有具有 MRSA 特异性菌落形态的选择性琼脂分离株均通过生化方法和质谱进行鉴定。

结果

最初的 CHROMagar MRSA 筛选在 1541 个样本中的 36 个样本中鉴定出可疑菌落。这 36 个分离株中,共有 25 个在 chromID 琼脂上显示出 MRSA 样生长。这 25 个分离株中,24 个被确认为 MRSA,而一个分离株被鉴定为金黄亚种。在 chromID 琼脂上未显示可疑生长的 11 株中,3 株为甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA,其中 1 例与棒状杆菌属共同定植),2 株被确认为 MRSA(其中 1 例与 MSSA 共同定植),2 株在传代过程中丢失,无法再培养,1 株无法通过应用方法鉴定,其余 3 株分别鉴定为腐生葡萄球菌、人葡萄球菌(与巨球菌共同定植)和科氏葡萄球菌。

结论

单独应用选择性琼脂 CHROMagar MRSA 的应用证明不够特异,无法可靠诊断 MRSA 的存在。两步法应用两种选择性琼脂的联合使用降低了这种非特异性,同时保持了可接受的低敏感性损失。因此,这种逐步筛选方法可能是资源有限的军事医疗野战营地的一种选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e84d/4509703/7ce2f81c8945/40779_2015_46_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验