• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用敏捷性动作评估鞋地相互作用。

Evaluation of the shoe-surface interaction using an agility maneuver.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University Sports Medicine Center, 2050 Kenny Road, Columbus, OH 43221, USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Sep;42(9):1754-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d7d307.

DOI:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d7d307
PMID:20164812
Abstract

PURPOSE

An increase in traction between the shoe and a playing surface can result in increased forces to be absorbed by the structures of the lower extremity. Alternately, decreased traction causes impaired performance. We hypothesized that changes in the coefficient of friction (CoF) will affect subjective and objective measures of performance for an agility maneuver.

METHODS

Thirty subjects were asked to perform a functional agility maneuver under CoF conditions from 0.3 to 0.7. Subjects performed this agility maneuver over a force plate and were asked to complete a questionnaire evaluating their ability to perform the task under various CoF conditions.

RESULTS

Time to complete the task decreased as CoF increased (from 3.1 +/- 0.6 s at CoF 0.3 to 2.6 +/- 0.5 s at CoF 0.5). Peak force, CoF max force plate, and subjective score all increased as CoF increased up to 0.5. CoF of 0.5 or above did not significantly change the subject's ability to perform the cutting maneuver either subjectively or objectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The CoF of 0.5 was deemed adequate to complete the task for this study. Values above CoF 0.5 did not lead to better performance. More studies are needed to build on these findings to establish criteria on safe shoe-surface interactions in athletic practice and play.

摘要

目的

鞋与运动表面之间的牵引力增加会导致下肢结构承受更大的力。相反,牵引力减小会导致运动表现受损。我们假设摩擦系数(CoF)的变化将影响敏捷性动作的主观和客观表现测量。

方法

30 名受试者被要求在 CoF 条件下(从 0.3 到 0.7)进行功能性敏捷性动作。受试者在测力板上进行此敏捷性动作,并被要求完成一份问卷,评估他们在各种 CoF 条件下完成任务的能力。

结果

完成任务的时间随着 CoF 的增加而减少(从 CoF 为 0.3 时的 3.1 +/- 0.6 秒减少到 CoF 为 0.5 时的 2.6 +/- 0.5 秒)。峰值力、CoF 最大测力板和主观评分都随着 CoF 的增加而增加,最高可达 0.5。CoF 为 0.5 或更高并不会显著改变受试者主观或客观完成切割动作的能力。

结论

在这项研究中,CoF 为 0.5 被认为足以完成任务。CoF 高于 0.5 并不会导致更好的表现。需要进一步的研究来建立运动实践和比赛中安全鞋-表面相互作用的标准。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the shoe-surface interaction using an agility maneuver.利用敏捷性动作评估鞋地相互作用。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Sep;42(9):1754-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d7d307.
2
Differences in Friction Performance between New and Worn Shoes.新鞋与旧鞋之间的摩擦性能差异。
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2020 Oct-Dec;8(4):209-214. doi: 10.1080/24725838.2021.1925998. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
3
Effects of slip testing parameters on measured coefficient of friction.滑动测试参数对测量摩擦系数的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2007 Nov;38(6):773-80. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.10.005. Epub 2007 Jan 2.
4
Perceiving slipperiness and grip: A meaningful relationship of the shoe-ground interface.感知滑度与抓地力:鞋底与地面界面的重要关系。
Gait Posture. 2017 Jan;51:58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.09.029. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
5
Coefficient of friction, walking speed and cadence on slippery and dry surfaces: shoes with different groove depths.摩擦系数、行走速度和步频在湿滑和干燥表面:不同槽深的鞋子。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019 Dec;25(4):524-529. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1398922. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
6
Prospective validity assessment of a friction prediction model based on tread outsole features of slip-resistant shoes.基于防滑鞋胎面外底特征的摩擦预测模型的前瞻性有效性评估。
Appl Ergon. 2024 Jan;114:104110. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104110. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
7
Effect of workers' shoe wear on objective and subjective assessment of slipperiness.工人鞋类穿着对滑倒客观和主观评估的影响。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1996 Sep;57(9):825-31. doi: 10.1080/15428119691014503.
8
Predictive multiscale computational model of shoe-floor coefficient of friction.鞋底与地面摩擦系数的预测性多尺度计算模型。
J Biomech. 2018 Jan 3;66:145-152. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
9
The effect of shoe soling tread groove width on the coefficient of friction with different sole materials, floors, and contaminants.鞋底花纹槽宽度对不同鞋底材料、地面及污染物摩擦系数的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2004 Nov;35(6):499-507. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.06.010.
10
Validating the ability of a portable shoe-floor friction testing device, NextSTEPS, to predict human slips.验证便携式鞋底摩擦测试设备 NextSTEPS 预测人体滑倒能力的有效性。
Appl Ergon. 2023 Jan;106:103854. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103854. Epub 2022 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute effects of footwear and surface condition on sport specific performance in athletes.鞋类和地面状况对运动员特定运动表现的急性影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 26;15(1):6969. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91515-w.
2
Six different football shoes, one playing surface and the weather; Assessing variation in shoe-surface traction over one season of elite football.六种不同的足球鞋,一种比赛场地和天气;评估一个精英足球赛季中鞋-地摩擦力的变化。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 30;14(4):e0216364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216364. eCollection 2019.
3
The effects of artificial surface temperature on mechanical properties and player kinematics during landing and acceleration.
人工表面温度对着陆和加速过程中力学性能及运动员运动学的影响。
J Sport Health Sci. 2016 Sep;5(3):355-360. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2015.01.013. Epub 2015 Jun 12.