Suppr超能文献

早产儿随意喂养或按需/半按需喂养与定时喂养的比较

Ad libitum or demand/semi-demand feeding versus scheduled interval feeding for preterm infants.

作者信息

McCormick Felicia M, Tosh Karen, McGuire William

机构信息

Mother and Infant Research Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Area 4, Seebohm Rowntree Building, Heslington, York, UK, YO10 5DD.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17(2):CD005255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005255.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Scheduled interval feeding of prescribed enteral volumes is current standard practice for preterm infants. However, feeding preterm infants in response to their hunger and satiation cues (ad libitum or demand/semi demand) rather than at scheduled intervals might help in the establishment of independent oral feeding, increase nutrient intake and growth rates, and allow earlier hospital discharge.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of a policy of feeding preterm infants on an ad libitum or demand/semi-demand basis versus feeding prescribed volumes at scheduled intervals on growth rates and the time to hospital discharge.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. This included searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to Oct 2009), EMBASE (1980 to Oct 2009), CINAHL (1982 to Oct 2009), conference proceedings, and previous reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials (including cluster randomised trials) that compared a policy of feeding preterm infants on an ad libitum or demand/semi-demand basis versus feeding at scheduled intervals.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by two review authors.

MAIN RESULTS

We found eight randomised controlled trials that compared ad libitum or demand/semi-demand regimens with scheduled interval regimes in preterm infants in the transition phase from intragastric tube to oral feeding. The trials were generally small and of variable methodological quality. The duration of the intervention and the duration of data collection and follow-up in most of the trials was not likely to have allowed detection of measurable effects on growth. Three trials reported that feeding preterm infants using an ad libitum or demand/semi-demand feeding regimen allowed earlier discharge from hospital (by about two to four days) but other trials did not confirm this finding.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence exists that feeding preterm infants with ad libitum or demand/semi-demand regimens allows earlier attainment of full oral feeding and earlier hospital discharge. This finding should be interpreted cautiously because of methodological weaknesses in the included trials. A large randomised controlled trial is needed to confirm this finding and to determine if ad libitum of demand/semi-demand feeding of preterm infants affects other clinically important outcomes.

摘要

背景

按规定的肠内喂养量进行定时喂养是目前早产儿的标准做法。然而,根据早产儿的饥饿和饱腹感信号(随意或按需/半按需)而非定时进行喂养,可能有助于建立自主经口喂养,增加营养摄入和生长速度,并使患儿更早出院。

目的

评估对早产儿采用随意或按需/半按需喂养策略与定时喂养规定量相比,对生长速度和出院时间的影响。

检索策略

我们采用了Cochrane新生儿综述小组的标准检索策略。这包括检索Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL,《Cochrane图书馆》,2009年第4期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2009年10月)、EMBASE(1980年至2009年10月)、CINAHL(1982年至2009年10月)、会议论文集以及以往的综述。

选择标准

随机或半随机对照试验(包括整群随机试验),比较对早产儿采用随意或按需/半按需喂养策略与定时喂养的效果。

数据收集与分析

我们采用了Cochrane新生儿综述小组的标准方法,由两位综述作者分别评估试验质量并提取数据。

主要结果

我们发现八项随机对照试验,比较了在从胃管喂养过渡到经口喂养阶段的早产儿中,随意或按需/半按需喂养方案与定时喂养方案的效果。这些试验规模普遍较小,方法学质量参差不齐。大多数试验的干预持续时间以及数据收集和随访持续时间,可能无法检测到对生长的可测量影响。三项试验报告称,采用随意或按需/半按需喂养方案喂养早产儿可使出院时间更早(提前约两到四天),但其他试验未证实这一发现。

作者结论

现有有限证据表明,对早产儿采用随意或按需/半按需喂养方案可使患儿更早实现完全经口喂养并更早出院。由于纳入试验存在方法学缺陷,这一发现应谨慎解读。需要开展一项大型随机对照试验来证实这一发现,并确定对早产儿进行随意或按需/半按需喂养是否会影响其他重要临床结局。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验