Suppr超能文献

用于闭塞性颈动脉疾病的颅外-颅内动脉搭桥手术。

Extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass surgery for occlusive carotid artery disease.

作者信息

Fluri Felix, Engelter Stefan, Lyrer Philippe

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, Basel, Switzerland, 4031.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17;2010(2):CD005953. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005953.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The EC/IC Bypass Study Group found no benefit of extracranial to intracranial (EC/IC) bypass surgery over medical therapy in patients with symptomatic carotid artery occlusion (sCAO). However, the study was criticised for many reasons and the real effect of this treatment is still not known conclusively.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether bypass surgery plus medical care is superior to medical care alone in patients with sCAO.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched June 2009). In addition, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2009) and EMBASE (1980 to June 2009). We also searched ongoing trials and research registers, checked reference lists of relevant articles, and contacted colleagues, trial authors and researchers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) and non-random studies of EC/IC bypass surgery plus best medical treatment compared with best medical treatment alone to prevent subsequent stroke, improve cerebral haemodynamics and reduce dependency after stroke.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, and extracted data items on the number of outcome events onto a data extraction form. We only analysed secondary outcomes if the study provided information on at least one primary outcome. We also used intention-to-treat analysis where possible.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 21 trials, including two RCTs, involving 2591 patients. For all endpoints, no benefit of EC/IC bypass surgery was shown either in the RCTs (any death: odds ratio (OR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 1.05, P = 0.11; stroke: OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.23, P = 0.91; death and dependency: OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.21, P = 0.64), or in the non-RCTs (any death: OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.62, P = 0.99; stroke: OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.18, P = 0.25; death and dependency: OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.29, P = 0.37).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: EC/IC bypass surgery in patients with sCAO disease was neither superior nor inferior to medical care alone. However, most studies included patients irrespective of their cerebral haemodynamics. Participation in an ongoing RCT, which is restricted to patients with impaired haemodynamics, is recommended as these patients might benefit from bypass surgery.

摘要

背景

颅外-颅内(EC/IC)旁路手术研究组发现,对于有症状性颈动脉闭塞(sCAO)的患者,EC/IC旁路手术并不比药物治疗更具优势。然而,该研究因诸多原因受到批评,这种治疗的实际效果仍未最终明确。

目的

确定在sCAO患者中,旁路手术联合药物治疗是否优于单纯药物治疗。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane卒中组试验注册库(最后检索时间为2009年6月)。此外,我们还检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(《Cochrane图书馆》2006年第2期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2009年6月)和EMBASE(1980年至2009年6月)。我们还检索了正在进行的试验和研究注册库,检查了相关文章的参考文献列表,并联系了同事、试验作者和研究人员。

入选标准

将EC/IC旁路手术联合最佳药物治疗与单纯最佳药物治疗进行比较以预防后续卒中、改善脑血流动力学并降低卒中后依赖程度的随机对照试验(RCT)和非随机研究。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立选择纳入研究,并将结局事件数量的数据项提取到数据提取表上。只有当研究提供了至少一项主要结局的信息时,我们才分析次要结局。我们还尽可能采用意向性分析。

主要结果

我们纳入了21项试验,包括两项RCT,涉及2591名患者。对于所有终点,在RCT中(任何死亡:比值比(OR)0.81,95%置信区间(CI)0.62至1.05,P = 0.11;卒中:OR 0.99,95%CI 0.79至1.23,P = 0.91;死亡和依赖:OR 0.94,95%CI 0.74至1.21,P = 0.64)或在非RCT中(任何死亡:OR 1.00,95%CI 0.62至1.62,P = 0.99;卒中:OR 0.80,95%CI 0.54至1.18,P = 0.25;死亡和依赖:OR 0.80,95%CI 0.50至1.29,P = 0.37),均未显示EC/IC旁路手术有优势。

作者结论

sCAO疾病患者的EC/IC旁路手术并不优于也不劣于单纯药物治疗。然而,大多数研究纳入患者时未考虑其脑血流动力学情况。建议参与一项正在进行的RCT,该试验仅限于血流动力学受损的患者,因为这些患者可能从旁路手术中获益。

相似文献

1
Extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass surgery for occlusive carotid artery disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17;2010(2):CD005953. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005953.pub2.
2
Graft type for femoro-popliteal bypass surgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 11;2(2):CD001487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001487.pub3.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
6
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
7
Antithrombotic treatment after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 26;1(1):CD012144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012144.pub3.
8
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus corticosteroids for controlling inflammation after uncomplicated cataract surgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 3;7(7):CD010516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010516.pub2.
9
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub7.
10
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary balloon angioplasty for chronic occlusion of intracranial internal carotid artery: A case report.
J Interv Med. 2022 Aug 12;5(4):213-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jimed.2022.07.001. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Sixteen years progress in recanalization of chronic carotid artery occlusion: A comprehensive review.
J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2023 Mar;25(1):1-12. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2022.E2022.03.008. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
4
Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: Management.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2022 Jul;22(7):383-388. doi: 10.1007/s11910-022-01201-x. Epub 2022 May 13.
7
Bypass in neurosurgery-indications and techniques.
Neurosurg Rev. 2019 Jun;42(2):389-393. doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-0966-9. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
10
Limb-shaking TIA: on the borders of evidence-based medicine.
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;12(5):675-677. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1666-0. Epub 2017 Apr 21.

本文引用的文献

1
STA-MCA bypass for symptomatic carotid occlusion and haemodynamic impairment.
J Clin Neurosci. 2009 Feb;16(2):226-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.01.022. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
2
[JET study (Japanese EC-IC Bypass Trial)].
Nihon Rinsho. 2006 Oct 28;64 Suppl 7:524-7.
4
The Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study.
Neurosurg Focus. 2003 Mar 15;14(3):e9. doi: 10.3171/foc.2003.14.3.10.
5
Antithrombotic drugs for carotid artery dissection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(3):CD000255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000255.
7
Benign prognosis of never-symptomatic carotid occlusion.
Neurology. 2000 Feb 22;54(4):878-82. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.4.878.
8
Symptomatic carotid artery occlusion. A reappraisal of hemodynamic factors.
Stroke. 1997 Oct;28(10):2084-93. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.10.2084.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验