Van Dolah Frances M, Leighfield Tod A, Doucette Gregory J, Bean Laurie, Niedzwiadek Barbara, Rawn Dorothea F K
NOAA National Ocean Service, Marine Biotoxins Program, 219 Fort Johnson Rd, Charleston, SC 29412, USA.
J AOAC Int. 2009 Nov-Dec;92(6):1705-13.
A single-laboratory validation (SLV) study was conducted for the microplate receptor binding assay (RBA) for paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) toxins in shellfish. The basis of the assay is the competition between [3H]saxitoxin (STX) and STX in a standard or sample for binding to the voltage dependent sodium channel. A calibration curve is generated by the addition of 0.01-1000 nM STX, which results in the concentration dependent decrease in [3H]STX-receptor complexes formed and serves to quantify STX in unknown samples. This study established the LOQ, linearity, recovery, accuracy, and precision of the assay for determining PSP toxicity in shellfish extracts, as performed by a single analyst on multiple days. The standard curve obtained on 5 independent days resulted in a half-maximal inhibition (IC50) of 2.3 nM STX +/- 0.3 (RSD = 10.8%) with a slope of 0.96 +/- 0.06 (RSD = 6.3%) and a dynamic range of 1.2-10.0 nM. The LOQ was 5.3 microg STX equivalents/100 g shellfish. Linearity, established by quantification of three levels of purified STX (1.5, 3, and 6 nM), yielded an r2 of 0.97. Recovery from mussels spiked with three levels (40, 80, and 120 microg STX/100 g) averaged 121%. Repeatability (RSD(r)), determined on six naturally contaminated shellfish samples on 5 independent days, was 17.7%. A method comparison with the AOAC mouse bioassay yielded r2 = 0.98 (slope = 1.29) in the SLV study. The effects of the extraction method on RBA-based toxicity values were assessed on shellfish extracted for PSP toxins using the AOAC mouse bioassay method (0.1 M HCI) compared to that for the precolumn oxidation HPLC method (0.1% acetic acid). The two extraction methods showed linear correlation (r2 = 0.99), with the HCl extraction method yielding slightly higher toxicity values (slope = 1.23). A similar relationship was observed between HPLC quantification of the HCI- and acetic acid-extracted samples (r2 = 0.98, slope 1.19). The RBA also had excellent linear correlation with HPLC analyses (r2 = 0.98 for HCl, r2 = 0.99 for acetic acid), but gave somewhat higher values than HPLC using either extraction method (slope = 1.39 for HCl extracts, slope = 1.32 for acetic acid). Overall, the excellent linear correlations with the both mouse bioassay and HPLC method and sufficient interassay repeatability suggest that the RBA can be effective as a high throughput screen for estimating PSP toxicity in shellfish.
针对贝类中麻痹性贝类毒素(PSP)的微孔板受体结合分析(RBA)开展了一项单实验室验证(SLV)研究。该分析的基础是[3H]石房蛤毒素(STX)与标准品或样品中的STX竞争结合电压依赖性钠通道。通过添加0.01 - 1000 nM STX生成校准曲线,这会导致形成的[3H]STX - 受体复合物的浓度依赖性降低,并用于定量未知样品中的STX。本研究确定了由一名分析人员在多个日期对贝类提取物进行PSP毒性测定时该分析方法的定量下限(LOQ)、线性、回收率、准确度和精密度。在5个独立日期获得的标准曲线导致半最大抑制浓度(IC50)为2.3 nM STX ± 0.3(相对标准偏差(RSD)= 10.8%),斜率为0.96 ± 0.06(RSD = 6.3%),动态范围为1.2 - 10.0 nM。LOQ为5.3 μg STX当量/100 g贝类。通过对三个水平的纯化STX(1.5、3和6 nM)进行定量确定的线性,得到的r2为0.97。从添加了三个水平(40、80和120 μg STX/100 g)的贻贝中回收的平均回收率为121%。在5个独立日期对6个天然污染的贝类样品进行测定的重复性(RSD(r))为17.7%。在SLV研究中,与AOAC小鼠生物测定法的方法比较得出r2 = 0.98(斜率 = 1.29)。与使用AOAC小鼠生物测定法(0.1 M HCl)提取PSP毒素的贝类相比,评估了提取方法对基于RBA的毒性值的影响,并与柱前氧化高效液相色谱法(0.1%乙酸)进行了比较。两种提取方法显示出线性相关性(r2 = 0.99),HCl提取法产生的毒性值略高(斜率 = 1.23)。在HCl和乙酸提取样品的高效液相色谱定量之间也观察到类似的关系(r2 = 0.98,斜率1.19)。RBA与高效液相色谱分析也具有极好的线性相关性(HCl提取的r2 = 0.98,乙酸提取的r2 = 0.99),但使用任何一种提取方法时,RBA给出的值都比高效液相色谱法略高(HCl提取物的斜率 = 1.39,乙酸提取物的斜率 = 1.32)。总体而言,与小鼠生物测定法和高效液相色谱法的极好线性相关性以及足够的批间重复性表明,RBA可有效地作为估计贝类中PSP毒性的高通量筛选方法。