Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Barrack Road, The Nothe, Weymouth, Dorset DT4 8UB, UK.
Technische Universität München, Walther-Meißner-Straße 3, 85748 Garching, Germany.
Mar Drugs. 2020 Dec 3;18(12):616. doi: 10.3390/md18120616.
With the move away from use of mouse bioassay (MBA) to test bivalve mollusc shellfish for paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) toxins, countries around the world are having to adopt non-animal-based alternatives that fulfil ethical and legal requirements. Various assays have been developed which have been subjected to single-laboratory and multi-laboratory validation studies, gaining acceptance as official methods of analysis and approval for use in some countries as official control testing methods. The majority of validation studies conducted to date do not, however, incorporate shellfish species sourced from Latin America. Consequently, this study sought to investigate the performance of five alternative PSP testing methods together with the MBA, comparing the PSP toxin data generated both qualitatively and quantitatively. The methods included a receptor binding assay (RBA), two liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (LC-FLD) methods including both pre-column and post-column oxidation, liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and a commercial lateral flow assay (LFA) from Scotia. A total of three hundred and forty-nine shellfish samples from Argentina, Mexico, Chile and Uruguay were assessed. For the majority of samples, qualitative results compared well between methods. Good statistical correlations were demonstrated between the majority of quantitative results, with a notably excellent correlation between the current EU reference method using pre-column oxidation LC-FLD and LC-MS/MS. The LFA showed great potential for qualitative determination of PSP toxins, although the findings of high numbers of false-positive results and two false negatives highlighted that some caution is still needed when interpreting results. This study demonstrated that effective replacement methods are available for countries that no longer wish to use the MBA, but highlighted the importance of comparing toxin data from the replacement method using local shellfish species of concern before implementing new methods in official control testing programs.
随着各国逐渐停止使用基于鼠生物测定法(MBA)来检测贝类软体动物麻痹性贝类毒素(PSP),它们不得不采用符合伦理和法律要求的非动物替代方法。目前已经开发出了各种检测方法,这些方法已经通过了单实验室和多实验室验证研究,获得了作为分析官方方法的认可,并在一些国家获得批准,可作为官方控制测试方法使用。然而,迄今为止进行的大多数验证研究并未纳入源自拉丁美洲的贝类物种。因此,本研究旨在调查五种替代 PSP 检测方法与 MBA 一起的性能,从定性和定量两个方面比较 PSP 毒素数据。这些方法包括受体结合测定法(RBA)、两种包括柱前和柱后氧化的荧光检测液相色谱法(LC-FLD)、液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)和来自 Scotia 的商业侧向流动测定法(LFA)。总共评估了来自阿根廷、墨西哥、智利和乌拉圭的 349 个贝类样本。对于大多数样本,方法之间的定性结果比较吻合。大多数定量结果之间显示出良好的统计学相关性,使用柱前氧化 LC-FLD 和 LC-MS/MS 的当前欧盟参考方法之间表现出极佳的相关性。LFA 显示出定性测定 PSP 毒素的巨大潜力,尽管高数量的假阳性结果和两个假阴性结果表明,在将新方法应用于官方控制测试计划之前,在解释结果时仍需谨慎。本研究表明,对于那些不再希望使用 MBA 的国家,有效的替代方法已经可用,但强调了在实施新方法之前,使用当地关注的贝类物种比较替代方法的毒素数据的重要性。